Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study

Orazio Zoccarato, Camilla Scabbio, Elena De Ponti, Roberta Matheoud, Lucia Leva, Sabrina Morzenti, Marco Menzaghi, Riccardo Campini, Claudio Marcassa, Angelo Del Sole, Silvana Garancini, Cinzia Crivellaro, Marco Brambilla, Michela Lecchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: This investigation used image data generated by a physical phantom over a wide range of count statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of several of the newer commercially available SPECT reconstruction iterative algorithms (IRR) in improving perfusion defect contrast and spatial resolution, while controlling image noise. Methods: A cardiac phantom was imaged using four different gamma cameras over a wide range of counts statistics (from 6 to 0.8 Mcounts). Images were reconstructed with FBP, OSEM, and the IRR available on site. IRR were applied without corrections (IRR NC), with attenuation correction (IRR AC), scatter correction (IRR SC), and attenuation + scatter corrections (IRR SCAC). Four image performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and image noise were analyzed. Results: IRR NC always determined significant improvements in all indices in comparison to FBP or OSEM. Improvements were emphasized with IRR SC and IRR SCAC. Count reduction from 6 to 1.5 Mcounts did not impair the performances of any of the considered indices. Conclusions: This is the first study comparing the relative performance of different, commercially available, IRR software, over a wide range of count statistics; the additional effect of scatter and attenuation corrections, alone or in combination, was also evaluated. Our results confirm that IRR algorithms produce substantial benefits with respect to conventional FBP or OSEM reconstruction methods, as assessed through different figures of merit, in particular when SC and/or SCAC are also included.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-148
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Gamma Cameras
Software
Perfusion

Keywords

  • Iterative reconstruction
  • myocardial perfusion imaging
  • reconstruction algorithms
  • resolution recovery
  • SPECT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study. / Zoccarato, Orazio; Scabbio, Camilla; De Ponti, Elena; Matheoud, Roberta; Leva, Lucia; Morzenti, Sabrina; Menzaghi, Marco; Campini, Riccardo; Marcassa, Claudio; Del Sole, Angelo; Garancini, Silvana; Crivellaro, Cinzia; Brambilla, Marco; Lecchi, Michela.

In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 135-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zoccarato, O, Scabbio, C, De Ponti, E, Matheoud, R, Leva, L, Morzenti, S, Menzaghi, M, Campini, R, Marcassa, C, Del Sole, A, Garancini, S, Crivellaro, C, Brambilla, M & Lecchi, M 2014, 'Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study', Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9821-0
Zoccarato, Orazio ; Scabbio, Camilla ; De Ponti, Elena ; Matheoud, Roberta ; Leva, Lucia ; Morzenti, Sabrina ; Menzaghi, Marco ; Campini, Riccardo ; Marcassa, Claudio ; Del Sole, Angelo ; Garancini, Silvana ; Crivellaro, Cinzia ; Brambilla, Marco ; Lecchi, Michela. / Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study. In: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 135-148.
@article{08a4047259d04ecbbedc96e1d25cbd0f,
title = "Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study",
abstract = "Background: This investigation used image data generated by a physical phantom over a wide range of count statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of several of the newer commercially available SPECT reconstruction iterative algorithms (IRR) in improving perfusion defect contrast and spatial resolution, while controlling image noise. Methods: A cardiac phantom was imaged using four different gamma cameras over a wide range of counts statistics (from 6 to 0.8 Mcounts). Images were reconstructed with FBP, OSEM, and the IRR available on site. IRR were applied without corrections (IRR NC), with attenuation correction (IRR AC), scatter correction (IRR SC), and attenuation + scatter corrections (IRR SCAC). Four image performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and image noise were analyzed. Results: IRR NC always determined significant improvements in all indices in comparison to FBP or OSEM. Improvements were emphasized with IRR SC and IRR SCAC. Count reduction from 6 to 1.5 Mcounts did not impair the performances of any of the considered indices. Conclusions: This is the first study comparing the relative performance of different, commercially available, IRR software, over a wide range of count statistics; the additional effect of scatter and attenuation corrections, alone or in combination, was also evaluated. Our results confirm that IRR algorithms produce substantial benefits with respect to conventional FBP or OSEM reconstruction methods, as assessed through different figures of merit, in particular when SC and/or SCAC are also included.",
keywords = "Iterative reconstruction, myocardial perfusion imaging, reconstruction algorithms, resolution recovery, SPECT",
author = "Orazio Zoccarato and Camilla Scabbio and {De Ponti}, Elena and Roberta Matheoud and Lucia Leva and Sabrina Morzenti and Marco Menzaghi and Riccardo Campini and Claudio Marcassa and {Del Sole}, Angelo and Silvana Garancini and Cinzia Crivellaro and Marco Brambilla and Michela Lecchi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s12350-013-9821-0",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "135--148",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",
issn = "1071-3581",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study

AU - Zoccarato, Orazio

AU - Scabbio, Camilla

AU - De Ponti, Elena

AU - Matheoud, Roberta

AU - Leva, Lucia

AU - Morzenti, Sabrina

AU - Menzaghi, Marco

AU - Campini, Riccardo

AU - Marcassa, Claudio

AU - Del Sole, Angelo

AU - Garancini, Silvana

AU - Crivellaro, Cinzia

AU - Brambilla, Marco

AU - Lecchi, Michela

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: This investigation used image data generated by a physical phantom over a wide range of count statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of several of the newer commercially available SPECT reconstruction iterative algorithms (IRR) in improving perfusion defect contrast and spatial resolution, while controlling image noise. Methods: A cardiac phantom was imaged using four different gamma cameras over a wide range of counts statistics (from 6 to 0.8 Mcounts). Images were reconstructed with FBP, OSEM, and the IRR available on site. IRR were applied without corrections (IRR NC), with attenuation correction (IRR AC), scatter correction (IRR SC), and attenuation + scatter corrections (IRR SCAC). Four image performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and image noise were analyzed. Results: IRR NC always determined significant improvements in all indices in comparison to FBP or OSEM. Improvements were emphasized with IRR SC and IRR SCAC. Count reduction from 6 to 1.5 Mcounts did not impair the performances of any of the considered indices. Conclusions: This is the first study comparing the relative performance of different, commercially available, IRR software, over a wide range of count statistics; the additional effect of scatter and attenuation corrections, alone or in combination, was also evaluated. Our results confirm that IRR algorithms produce substantial benefits with respect to conventional FBP or OSEM reconstruction methods, as assessed through different figures of merit, in particular when SC and/or SCAC are also included.

AB - Background: This investigation used image data generated by a physical phantom over a wide range of count statistics to evaluate the effectiveness of several of the newer commercially available SPECT reconstruction iterative algorithms (IRR) in improving perfusion defect contrast and spatial resolution, while controlling image noise. Methods: A cardiac phantom was imaged using four different gamma cameras over a wide range of counts statistics (from 6 to 0.8 Mcounts). Images were reconstructed with FBP, OSEM, and the IRR available on site. IRR were applied without corrections (IRR NC), with attenuation correction (IRR AC), scatter correction (IRR SC), and attenuation + scatter corrections (IRR SCAC). Four image performance indices related to spatial resolution, contrast, and image noise were analyzed. Results: IRR NC always determined significant improvements in all indices in comparison to FBP or OSEM. Improvements were emphasized with IRR SC and IRR SCAC. Count reduction from 6 to 1.5 Mcounts did not impair the performances of any of the considered indices. Conclusions: This is the first study comparing the relative performance of different, commercially available, IRR software, over a wide range of count statistics; the additional effect of scatter and attenuation corrections, alone or in combination, was also evaluated. Our results confirm that IRR algorithms produce substantial benefits with respect to conventional FBP or OSEM reconstruction methods, as assessed through different figures of merit, in particular when SC and/or SCAC are also included.

KW - Iterative reconstruction

KW - myocardial perfusion imaging

KW - reconstruction algorithms

KW - resolution recovery

KW - SPECT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893833988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893833988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12350-013-9821-0

DO - 10.1007/s12350-013-9821-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 24272971

AN - SCOPUS:84893833988

VL - 21

SP - 135

EP - 148

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

SN - 1071-3581

IS - 1

ER -