Comparative biomechanical evaluation of different wheelchair seat cushions

Maurizio Ferrarin, Giuseppe Andreoni, Antonio Pedotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to perform a comparative biomechanical analysis of four antidecubitus wheel-chair cushions. Thirty wheelchair users were considered divided into three groups: paraplegic subjects (with no cutaneous sensation), neurologic subjects (with intact cutaneous sensation), and elderly subjects. The biomechanical evaluation was performed using a piezoresistive sensor matrix system to quantify parameters referred to pressure distribution, seating surface and posture. Dedicated software was developed for the automatic elaboration of the raw data and the computation of the parameters of interest. Differences among cushion types and subject groups were analyzed. An analysis of time-transient behaviors was also performed. Results showed that no significant differences in pressure peak reduction were found among the four cushions. Moreover, no time-transient behavior was shown by any cushions. However, both the location of pressure peaks and posture were dependent on cushion types. Comparison of the three subject groups showed that elderly subjects had the highest mean pressure and the lowest contact surface, while paraplegics presented the highest pressure peaks. This procedure appears indicated for individualizing the prescription of a wheelchair cushion and even for customizing a cushion to induce a specific posture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-324
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume37
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 2000

Fingerprint

Wheelchairs
Seats
Pressure
Posture
Skin
Pressure distribution
Wheels
Nervous System
Prescriptions
Software
Sensors

Keywords

  • Decubitus ulcers
  • Posture
  • Pressure distribution
  • Pressure sores
  • Wheelchair cushion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Comparative biomechanical evaluation of different wheelchair seat cushions. / Ferrarin, Maurizio; Andreoni, Giuseppe; Pedotti, Antonio.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 37, No. 3, 05.2000, p. 315-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{707fef4941c34ada9114a58cf5e268f5,
title = "Comparative biomechanical evaluation of different wheelchair seat cushions",
abstract = "The aim of the present study was to perform a comparative biomechanical analysis of four antidecubitus wheel-chair cushions. Thirty wheelchair users were considered divided into three groups: paraplegic subjects (with no cutaneous sensation), neurologic subjects (with intact cutaneous sensation), and elderly subjects. The biomechanical evaluation was performed using a piezoresistive sensor matrix system to quantify parameters referred to pressure distribution, seating surface and posture. Dedicated software was developed for the automatic elaboration of the raw data and the computation of the parameters of interest. Differences among cushion types and subject groups were analyzed. An analysis of time-transient behaviors was also performed. Results showed that no significant differences in pressure peak reduction were found among the four cushions. Moreover, no time-transient behavior was shown by any cushions. However, both the location of pressure peaks and posture were dependent on cushion types. Comparison of the three subject groups showed that elderly subjects had the highest mean pressure and the lowest contact surface, while paraplegics presented the highest pressure peaks. This procedure appears indicated for individualizing the prescription of a wheelchair cushion and even for customizing a cushion to induce a specific posture.",
keywords = "Decubitus ulcers, Posture, Pressure distribution, Pressure sores, Wheelchair cushion",
author = "Maurizio Ferrarin and Giuseppe Andreoni and Antonio Pedotti",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "315--324",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation R&D",
issn = "0748-7711",
publisher = "Rehabilitation Research and Development Service",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative biomechanical evaluation of different wheelchair seat cushions

AU - Ferrarin, Maurizio

AU - Andreoni, Giuseppe

AU - Pedotti, Antonio

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - The aim of the present study was to perform a comparative biomechanical analysis of four antidecubitus wheel-chair cushions. Thirty wheelchair users were considered divided into three groups: paraplegic subjects (with no cutaneous sensation), neurologic subjects (with intact cutaneous sensation), and elderly subjects. The biomechanical evaluation was performed using a piezoresistive sensor matrix system to quantify parameters referred to pressure distribution, seating surface and posture. Dedicated software was developed for the automatic elaboration of the raw data and the computation of the parameters of interest. Differences among cushion types and subject groups were analyzed. An analysis of time-transient behaviors was also performed. Results showed that no significant differences in pressure peak reduction were found among the four cushions. Moreover, no time-transient behavior was shown by any cushions. However, both the location of pressure peaks and posture were dependent on cushion types. Comparison of the three subject groups showed that elderly subjects had the highest mean pressure and the lowest contact surface, while paraplegics presented the highest pressure peaks. This procedure appears indicated for individualizing the prescription of a wheelchair cushion and even for customizing a cushion to induce a specific posture.

AB - The aim of the present study was to perform a comparative biomechanical analysis of four antidecubitus wheel-chair cushions. Thirty wheelchair users were considered divided into three groups: paraplegic subjects (with no cutaneous sensation), neurologic subjects (with intact cutaneous sensation), and elderly subjects. The biomechanical evaluation was performed using a piezoresistive sensor matrix system to quantify parameters referred to pressure distribution, seating surface and posture. Dedicated software was developed for the automatic elaboration of the raw data and the computation of the parameters of interest. Differences among cushion types and subject groups were analyzed. An analysis of time-transient behaviors was also performed. Results showed that no significant differences in pressure peak reduction were found among the four cushions. Moreover, no time-transient behavior was shown by any cushions. However, both the location of pressure peaks and posture were dependent on cushion types. Comparison of the three subject groups showed that elderly subjects had the highest mean pressure and the lowest contact surface, while paraplegics presented the highest pressure peaks. This procedure appears indicated for individualizing the prescription of a wheelchair cushion and even for customizing a cushion to induce a specific posture.

KW - Decubitus ulcers

KW - Posture

KW - Pressure distribution

KW - Pressure sores

KW - Wheelchair cushion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034190236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034190236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10917263

AN - SCOPUS:0034190236

VL - 37

SP - 315

EP - 324

JO - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

JF - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

SN - 0748-7711

IS - 3

ER -