Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and folfirinox in the first-line setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sara Pusceddu, Michele Ghidini, Martina Torchio, Francesca Corti, Gianluca Tomasello, Monica Niger, Natalie Prinzi, Federico Nichetti, Andrea Coinu, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Mary Cabiddu, Rodolfo Passalacqua, Filippo De Braud, Fausto Petrelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) and the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) are valid first-line options for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, no randomized trials comparing the two schemes have been performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX in terms of safety and effectiveness, taking into account data from real-life studies on mPC. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library up to November 2018 to identify retrospective or cohort studies on mPC comparing GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX. We included 16 retrospective studies, including 3813 patients (2123 treated with GEM-NAB and 1690 treated with FOLFIRINOX). Despite a median weighted overall survival (OS) difference in favor of FOLFIRINOX (mean difference: 1.15, 95% confidence interval CI 0.08–2.22, p = 0.03), in whole population OS was similar (hazard ratio (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.84–1.16; p = 0.9). PFS was also not different between the two arms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71–1.1; p = 0.26). The overall response rate was similar (25 vs. 24% with GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX). Among grade 3–4 toxicities, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were lower with GEM-NAB, while neurotoxicity and anemia were lower with FOLFIRINOX. In conclusion, despite a numerically longer median OS with FOLFIRINOX as compared to GEM-NAB, the overall risk of death and progression were similar. Their toxicity was different with less nausea, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia with GEM-NAB, as compared to less neurotoxicity and anemia with FOLFIRINOX. Therefore, analysis of non-randomized “real world” studies to date has not provided evidence of a major benefit of one regimen over the other.

Original languageEnglish
Article number484
JournalCancers
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

gemcitabine
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Meta-Analysis
Febrile Neutropenia
oxaliplatin
irinotecan
Neutropenia
Nausea
Survival
Anemia
Retrospective Studies
130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel
PubMed
Fluorouracil
Libraries

Keywords

  • And nab-paclitaxel
  • FOLFIRINOX
  • Gemcitabine
  • Pancreatic cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and folfirinox in the first-line setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Pusceddu, Sara; Ghidini, Michele; Torchio, Martina; Corti, Francesca; Tomasello, Gianluca; Niger, Monica; Prinzi, Natalie; Nichetti, Federico; Coinu, Andrea; Bartolomeo, Maria Di; Cabiddu, Mary; Passalacqua, Rodolfo; De Braud, Filippo; Petrelli, Fausto.

In: Cancers, Vol. 11, No. 4, 484, 04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pusceddu, Sara ; Ghidini, Michele ; Torchio, Martina ; Corti, Francesca ; Tomasello, Gianluca ; Niger, Monica ; Prinzi, Natalie ; Nichetti, Federico ; Coinu, Andrea ; Bartolomeo, Maria Di ; Cabiddu, Mary ; Passalacqua, Rodolfo ; De Braud, Filippo ; Petrelli, Fausto. / Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and folfirinox in the first-line setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Cancers. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 4.
@article{75ef109d737c4079ae9780dec806b355,
title = "Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and folfirinox in the first-line setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) and the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) are valid first-line options for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, no randomized trials comparing the two schemes have been performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX in terms of safety and effectiveness, taking into account data from real-life studies on mPC. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library up to November 2018 to identify retrospective or cohort studies on mPC comparing GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX. We included 16 retrospective studies, including 3813 patients (2123 treated with GEM-NAB and 1690 treated with FOLFIRINOX). Despite a median weighted overall survival (OS) difference in favor of FOLFIRINOX (mean difference: 1.15, 95{\%} confidence interval CI 0.08–2.22, p = 0.03), in whole population OS was similar (hazard ratio (HR = 0.99, 95{\%} CI 0.84–1.16; p = 0.9). PFS was also not different between the two arms (HR = 0.88, 95{\%} CI 0.71–1.1; p = 0.26). The overall response rate was similar (25 vs. 24{\%} with GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX). Among grade 3–4 toxicities, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were lower with GEM-NAB, while neurotoxicity and anemia were lower with FOLFIRINOX. In conclusion, despite a numerically longer median OS with FOLFIRINOX as compared to GEM-NAB, the overall risk of death and progression were similar. Their toxicity was different with less nausea, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia with GEM-NAB, as compared to less neurotoxicity and anemia with FOLFIRINOX. Therefore, analysis of non-randomized “real world” studies to date has not provided evidence of a major benefit of one regimen over the other.",
keywords = "And nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabine, Pancreatic cancer",
author = "Sara Pusceddu and Michele Ghidini and Martina Torchio and Francesca Corti and Gianluca Tomasello and Monica Niger and Natalie Prinzi and Federico Nichetti and Andrea Coinu and Bartolomeo, {Maria Di} and Mary Cabiddu and Rodolfo Passalacqua and {De Braud}, Filippo and Fausto Petrelli",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3390/cancers11040484",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Cancers",
issn = "2072-6694",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and folfirinox in the first-line setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Pusceddu, Sara

AU - Ghidini, Michele

AU - Torchio, Martina

AU - Corti, Francesca

AU - Tomasello, Gianluca

AU - Niger, Monica

AU - Prinzi, Natalie

AU - Nichetti, Federico

AU - Coinu, Andrea

AU - Bartolomeo, Maria Di

AU - Cabiddu, Mary

AU - Passalacqua, Rodolfo

AU - De Braud, Filippo

AU - Petrelli, Fausto

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) and the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) are valid first-line options for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, no randomized trials comparing the two schemes have been performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX in terms of safety and effectiveness, taking into account data from real-life studies on mPC. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library up to November 2018 to identify retrospective or cohort studies on mPC comparing GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX. We included 16 retrospective studies, including 3813 patients (2123 treated with GEM-NAB and 1690 treated with FOLFIRINOX). Despite a median weighted overall survival (OS) difference in favor of FOLFIRINOX (mean difference: 1.15, 95% confidence interval CI 0.08–2.22, p = 0.03), in whole population OS was similar (hazard ratio (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.84–1.16; p = 0.9). PFS was also not different between the two arms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71–1.1; p = 0.26). The overall response rate was similar (25 vs. 24% with GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX). Among grade 3–4 toxicities, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were lower with GEM-NAB, while neurotoxicity and anemia were lower with FOLFIRINOX. In conclusion, despite a numerically longer median OS with FOLFIRINOX as compared to GEM-NAB, the overall risk of death and progression were similar. Their toxicity was different with less nausea, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia with GEM-NAB, as compared to less neurotoxicity and anemia with FOLFIRINOX. Therefore, analysis of non-randomized “real world” studies to date has not provided evidence of a major benefit of one regimen over the other.

AB - Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) and the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) are valid first-line options for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, no randomized trials comparing the two schemes have been performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX in terms of safety and effectiveness, taking into account data from real-life studies on mPC. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library up to November 2018 to identify retrospective or cohort studies on mPC comparing GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX. We included 16 retrospective studies, including 3813 patients (2123 treated with GEM-NAB and 1690 treated with FOLFIRINOX). Despite a median weighted overall survival (OS) difference in favor of FOLFIRINOX (mean difference: 1.15, 95% confidence interval CI 0.08–2.22, p = 0.03), in whole population OS was similar (hazard ratio (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.84–1.16; p = 0.9). PFS was also not different between the two arms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71–1.1; p = 0.26). The overall response rate was similar (25 vs. 24% with GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX). Among grade 3–4 toxicities, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were lower with GEM-NAB, while neurotoxicity and anemia were lower with FOLFIRINOX. In conclusion, despite a numerically longer median OS with FOLFIRINOX as compared to GEM-NAB, the overall risk of death and progression were similar. Their toxicity was different with less nausea, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia with GEM-NAB, as compared to less neurotoxicity and anemia with FOLFIRINOX. Therefore, analysis of non-randomized “real world” studies to date has not provided evidence of a major benefit of one regimen over the other.

KW - And nab-paclitaxel

KW - FOLFIRINOX

KW - Gemcitabine

KW - Pancreatic cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065288199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065288199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/cancers11040484

DO - 10.3390/cancers11040484

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065288199

VL - 11

JO - Cancers

JF - Cancers

SN - 2072-6694

IS - 4

M1 - 484

ER -