Comparative effects of group metacognitive therapy versus behavioural activation in moderately depressed students

Mehdi Zemestani, Iran Davoodi, Mahnaz Mehrabizadeh Honarmand, Yadollah Zargar, Cristina Ottaviani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The high incidence and prevalence rates of depression among students identify them as a vulnerable population and make the case for the development of cost-effective treatments. Aims: We aimed to examine the comparative effects of brief group metacognitive therapy (MCT) versus behavioural activation (BA) treatments for depression, anxiety, and emotion regulation in university students. Method: All participants (25 women, 16 men; age range: 18–30 years) fulfilled criteria for major depression and were randomly assigned to MCT (n = 15), BA (n = 15), or a wait-list control group (n = 15). The treatment groups received 8 weekly MCT or BA sessions. Scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Results: This pilot study showed that both treatments were equally effective for depressive and anxiety symptoms. However, therapeutic techniques differed with regards to their effects on specific facets of emotion regulation, such as Positive Reappraisal and Catastrophizing, with MCT being more effective compared to BA. BA also showed a stronger relapse at follow-up with regards to Acceptance and Refocus on Planning. Conclusions: Results suggest that groups MCT and BA may be implemented as cost-effective treatments for students with moderate depression.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Mental Health
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Oct 5 2015

Fingerprint

Group Psychotherapy
Students
Depression
Emotions
Anxiety
Health Care Costs
Therapeutics
Catastrophization
Equipment and Supplies
Vulnerable Populations
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Recurrence
Control Groups
Incidence

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • behavioural activation
  • depression
  • emotion
  • regulation metacognitive therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Comparative effects of group metacognitive therapy versus behavioural activation in moderately depressed students. / Zemestani, Mehdi; Davoodi, Iran; Honarmand, Mahnaz Mehrabizadeh; Zargar, Yadollah; Ottaviani, Cristina.

In: Journal of Mental Health, 05.10.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zemestani, Mehdi ; Davoodi, Iran ; Honarmand, Mahnaz Mehrabizadeh ; Zargar, Yadollah ; Ottaviani, Cristina. / Comparative effects of group metacognitive therapy versus behavioural activation in moderately depressed students. In: Journal of Mental Health. 2015.
@article{c09c96dc41474560bf45dec7457d89bf,
title = "Comparative effects of group metacognitive therapy versus behavioural activation in moderately depressed students",
abstract = "Background: The high incidence and prevalence rates of depression among students identify them as a vulnerable population and make the case for the development of cost-effective treatments. Aims: We aimed to examine the comparative effects of brief group metacognitive therapy (MCT) versus behavioural activation (BA) treatments for depression, anxiety, and emotion regulation in university students. Method: All participants (25 women, 16 men; age range: 18–30 years) fulfilled criteria for major depression and were randomly assigned to MCT (n = 15), BA (n = 15), or a wait-list control group (n = 15). The treatment groups received 8 weekly MCT or BA sessions. Scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Results: This pilot study showed that both treatments were equally effective for depressive and anxiety symptoms. However, therapeutic techniques differed with regards to their effects on specific facets of emotion regulation, such as Positive Reappraisal and Catastrophizing, with MCT being more effective compared to BA. BA also showed a stronger relapse at follow-up with regards to Acceptance and Refocus on Planning. Conclusions: Results suggest that groups MCT and BA may be implemented as cost-effective treatments for students with moderate depression.",
keywords = "Anxiety, behavioural activation, depression, emotion, regulation metacognitive therapy",
author = "Mehdi Zemestani and Iran Davoodi and Honarmand, {Mahnaz Mehrabizadeh} and Yadollah Zargar and Cristina Ottaviani",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.3109/09638237.2015.1057326",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative effects of group metacognitive therapy versus behavioural activation in moderately depressed students

AU - Zemestani, Mehdi

AU - Davoodi, Iran

AU - Honarmand, Mahnaz Mehrabizadeh

AU - Zargar, Yadollah

AU - Ottaviani, Cristina

PY - 2015/10/5

Y1 - 2015/10/5

N2 - Background: The high incidence and prevalence rates of depression among students identify them as a vulnerable population and make the case for the development of cost-effective treatments. Aims: We aimed to examine the comparative effects of brief group metacognitive therapy (MCT) versus behavioural activation (BA) treatments for depression, anxiety, and emotion regulation in university students. Method: All participants (25 women, 16 men; age range: 18–30 years) fulfilled criteria for major depression and were randomly assigned to MCT (n = 15), BA (n = 15), or a wait-list control group (n = 15). The treatment groups received 8 weekly MCT or BA sessions. Scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Results: This pilot study showed that both treatments were equally effective for depressive and anxiety symptoms. However, therapeutic techniques differed with regards to their effects on specific facets of emotion regulation, such as Positive Reappraisal and Catastrophizing, with MCT being more effective compared to BA. BA also showed a stronger relapse at follow-up with regards to Acceptance and Refocus on Planning. Conclusions: Results suggest that groups MCT and BA may be implemented as cost-effective treatments for students with moderate depression.

AB - Background: The high incidence and prevalence rates of depression among students identify them as a vulnerable population and make the case for the development of cost-effective treatments. Aims: We aimed to examine the comparative effects of brief group metacognitive therapy (MCT) versus behavioural activation (BA) treatments for depression, anxiety, and emotion regulation in university students. Method: All participants (25 women, 16 men; age range: 18–30 years) fulfilled criteria for major depression and were randomly assigned to MCT (n = 15), BA (n = 15), or a wait-list control group (n = 15). The treatment groups received 8 weekly MCT or BA sessions. Scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Results: This pilot study showed that both treatments were equally effective for depressive and anxiety symptoms. However, therapeutic techniques differed with regards to their effects on specific facets of emotion regulation, such as Positive Reappraisal and Catastrophizing, with MCT being more effective compared to BA. BA also showed a stronger relapse at follow-up with regards to Acceptance and Refocus on Planning. Conclusions: Results suggest that groups MCT and BA may be implemented as cost-effective treatments for students with moderate depression.

KW - Anxiety

KW - behavioural activation

KW - depression

KW - emotion

KW - regulation metacognitive therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945217367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945217367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09638237.2015.1057326

DO - 10.3109/09638237.2015.1057326

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945217367

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

ER -