Abstract
Phase 2, parallel-group, multicenter, open-label, 4-week study, comparing PK of PR-T vs IR-T in de novo pediatric patients undergoing primary kidney, liver, or heart transplantation. Patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily, PR-T-, or twice-daily, IR-T-based regimens; dose adjustments permitted after Day 1. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles collected on Days 1, 7, and 28. Primary endpoint: tacrolimus AUC24 . Secondary end points included tacrolimus C24 and Cmax . Endpoints compared between PR-T and IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28. Predefined similarity interval for CIs of LSM ratios: 80%-125%. PK analysis set comprised 33 patients (PR-T, n = 15; IR-T, n = 18). Overall, AUC24 and Cmax were lower on Day 1 vs 7 and 28. Geometric LSM ratios of PR-T:IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28 were 66.3%, 92.5%, 99.9%, respectively, for AUC24 ; 66.3%, 82.2%, 90.9% for C24 ; and 77.3%, 120.3%, 92.2% for Cmax . AUC24 90% CI within predefined similarity interval on Day 28; other 90% CIs fell outside. Linear relationship was similar between AUC24 and C24 , and between tacrolimus formulations, suggesting that the same therapeutic drug monitoring method can be used with both formulations in de novo pediatric allograft recipients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e13289 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Pediatric Transplantation |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - Oct 24 2018 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric transplant recipients randomized to receive immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus. / Vondrak, Karel; Dhawan, Anil; Parisi, Francesco; Grenda, Ryszard; Debray, Dominique; Marks, Stephen D; Webb, Nicholas J A; Lachaux, Alain; Kazeem, Gbenga; Undre, Nasrullah.
In: Pediatric Transplantation, 24.10.2018, p. e13289.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric transplant recipients randomized to receive immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus
AU - Vondrak, Karel
AU - Dhawan, Anil
AU - Parisi, Francesco
AU - Grenda, Ryszard
AU - Debray, Dominique
AU - Marks, Stephen D
AU - Webb, Nicholas J A
AU - Lachaux, Alain
AU - Kazeem, Gbenga
AU - Undre, Nasrullah
N1 - © 2018 The Authors. Pediatric Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/10/24
Y1 - 2018/10/24
N2 - Phase 2, parallel-group, multicenter, open-label, 4-week study, comparing PK of PR-T vs IR-T in de novo pediatric patients undergoing primary kidney, liver, or heart transplantation. Patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily, PR-T-, or twice-daily, IR-T-based regimens; dose adjustments permitted after Day 1. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles collected on Days 1, 7, and 28. Primary endpoint: tacrolimus AUC24 . Secondary end points included tacrolimus C24 and Cmax . Endpoints compared between PR-T and IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28. Predefined similarity interval for CIs of LSM ratios: 80%-125%. PK analysis set comprised 33 patients (PR-T, n = 15; IR-T, n = 18). Overall, AUC24 and Cmax were lower on Day 1 vs 7 and 28. Geometric LSM ratios of PR-T:IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28 were 66.3%, 92.5%, 99.9%, respectively, for AUC24 ; 66.3%, 82.2%, 90.9% for C24 ; and 77.3%, 120.3%, 92.2% for Cmax . AUC24 90% CI within predefined similarity interval on Day 28; other 90% CIs fell outside. Linear relationship was similar between AUC24 and C24 , and between tacrolimus formulations, suggesting that the same therapeutic drug monitoring method can be used with both formulations in de novo pediatric allograft recipients.
AB - Phase 2, parallel-group, multicenter, open-label, 4-week study, comparing PK of PR-T vs IR-T in de novo pediatric patients undergoing primary kidney, liver, or heart transplantation. Patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily, PR-T-, or twice-daily, IR-T-based regimens; dose adjustments permitted after Day 1. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles collected on Days 1, 7, and 28. Primary endpoint: tacrolimus AUC24 . Secondary end points included tacrolimus C24 and Cmax . Endpoints compared between PR-T and IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28. Predefined similarity interval for CIs of LSM ratios: 80%-125%. PK analysis set comprised 33 patients (PR-T, n = 15; IR-T, n = 18). Overall, AUC24 and Cmax were lower on Day 1 vs 7 and 28. Geometric LSM ratios of PR-T:IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28 were 66.3%, 92.5%, 99.9%, respectively, for AUC24 ; 66.3%, 82.2%, 90.9% for C24 ; and 77.3%, 120.3%, 92.2% for Cmax . AUC24 90% CI within predefined similarity interval on Day 28; other 90% CIs fell outside. Linear relationship was similar between AUC24 and C24 , and between tacrolimus formulations, suggesting that the same therapeutic drug monitoring method can be used with both formulations in de novo pediatric allograft recipients.
U2 - 10.1111/petr.13289
DO - 10.1111/petr.13289
M3 - Article
C2 - 30358019
SP - e13289
JO - Pediatric Transplantation
JF - Pediatric Transplantation
SN - 1397-3142
ER -