Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric transplant recipients randomized to receive immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus

Karel Vondrak, Anil Dhawan, Francesco Parisi, Ryszard Grenda, Dominique Debray, Stephen D Marks, Nicholas J A Webb, Alain Lachaux, Gbenga Kazeem, Nasrullah Undre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Phase 2, parallel-group, multicenter, open-label, 4-week study, comparing PK of PR-T vs IR-T in de novo pediatric patients undergoing primary kidney, liver, or heart transplantation. Patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily, PR-T-, or twice-daily, IR-T-based regimens; dose adjustments permitted after Day 1. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles collected on Days 1, 7, and 28. Primary endpoint: tacrolimus AUC24 . Secondary end points included tacrolimus C24 and Cmax . Endpoints compared between PR-T and IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28. Predefined similarity interval for CIs of LSM ratios: 80%-125%. PK analysis set comprised 33 patients (PR-T, n = 15; IR-T, n = 18). Overall, AUC24 and Cmax were lower on Day 1 vs 7 and 28. Geometric LSM ratios of PR-T:IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28 were 66.3%, 92.5%, 99.9%, respectively, for AUC24 ; 66.3%, 82.2%, 90.9% for C24 ; and 77.3%, 120.3%, 92.2% for Cmax . AUC24 90% CI within predefined similarity interval on Day 28; other 90% CIs fell outside. Linear relationship was similar between AUC24 and C24 , and between tacrolimus formulations, suggesting that the same therapeutic drug monitoring method can be used with both formulations in de novo pediatric allograft recipients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e13289
Number of pages9
JournalPediatric Transplantation
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Oct 24 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric transplant recipients randomized to receive immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this