Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation

Stefania Luppi, Monica Martinelli, Elisa Giacomini, Elena Giolo, Gabriella Zito, Rodolfo C. Garcia, Giuseppe Ricci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. Methods: Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p <0.05, Anova). Results: No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7% similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. Conclusions: The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential.

Original languageEnglish
Article number36
JournalReproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 19 2015

Fingerprint

Density Gradient Centrifugation
Proteomics
Spermatozoa
Fumarate Hydratase
Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases
Proteins
Pyruvate Kinase
Cell Separation
DNA Methylation
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
Software
Cell Count
Gels

Keywords

  • Density gradient centrifugation
  • Protein 2-dimensional maps
  • Sperm cells
  • Swim-up

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Biology
  • Endocrinology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation. / Luppi, Stefania; Martinelli, Monica; Giacomini, Elisa; Giolo, Elena; Zito, Gabriella; Garcia, Rodolfo C.; Ricci, Giuseppe.

In: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 36, 19.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Luppi, Stefania ; Martinelli, Monica ; Giacomini, Elisa ; Giolo, Elena ; Zito, Gabriella ; Garcia, Rodolfo C. ; Ricci, Giuseppe. / Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation. In: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.
@article{a3ee243bcfca4666bc6a6acc538b26a6,
title = "Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation",
abstract = "Background: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. Methods: Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p <0.05, Anova). Results: No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7{\%} similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. Conclusions: The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential.",
keywords = "Density gradient centrifugation, Protein 2-dimensional maps, Sperm cells, Swim-up",
author = "Stefania Luppi and Monica Martinelli and Elisa Giacomini and Elena Giolo and Gabriella Zito and Garcia, {Rodolfo C.} and Giuseppe Ricci",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology",
issn = "1477-7827",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative proteomic analysis of spermatozoa isolated by swim-up or density gradient centrifugation

AU - Luppi, Stefania

AU - Martinelli, Monica

AU - Giacomini, Elisa

AU - Giolo, Elena

AU - Zito, Gabriella

AU - Garcia, Rodolfo C.

AU - Ricci, Giuseppe

PY - 2015/4/19

Y1 - 2015/4/19

N2 - Background: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. Methods: Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p <0.05, Anova). Results: No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7% similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. Conclusions: The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential.

AB - Background: Reports about the morphologic and functional characteristics of spermatozoa prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DC) or swim-up (SU) have produced discordant results. We have performed a proteomic comparison of cells prepared by DC and SU providing a molecular insight into the differences between these two methods of sperm cell isolation. Methods: Protein maps were obtained by 2-dimensional (2-D) separations consisting of isoelectrofocusing (IEF) from pI 3 to 11 followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2-D gels were stained with Sypro Ruby. Map images of DC and SU spermatozoa were compared using dedicated software. Intensities of a given spot were considered different between DC and SU when their group mean differed by >1.5-fold (p <0.05, Anova). Results: No differences were observed for 853 spots, indicating a 98.7% similarity between DC and SU. Five spots were DC > SU and 1 was SU > DC. Proteins present in 3 of the differential spots could be identified. One DC > SU spot contained lactate dehydrogenase C and gamma-glutamylhydrolase, a second DC > SU spot contained fumarate hydratase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-2, and a SU > DC spot contained pyruvate kinase M1/M2. Conclusions: The differences in protein levels found on comparison of DC with SU spermatozoa indicate possible dissimilarities in their glycolytic metabolism and DNA methylation and suggest that DC cells may have a better capacitation potential.

KW - Density gradient centrifugation

KW - Protein 2-dimensional maps

KW - Sperm cells

KW - Swim-up

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928567418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928567418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y

DO - 10.1186/s12958-015-0027-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928567418

VL - 13

JO - Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

JF - Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

SN - 1477-7827

IS - 1

M1 - 36

ER -