Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

V. Savarino, P. Ceppa, E. Biggi, V. Arcuri, C. Mansi, G. Celle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A consecutive series of 51 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were studied in order to evaluate the contribution of cytologic data in establishing a definitive diagnosis of the tumor. A percutaneous ultrasonically-guided, and a peroperative fine-needle, aspriation were performed in 26 and 29 patients respectively; 4 cases underwent both methods. Final histologic diagnosis in surgical or autopsy specimens showed cancer of the pancreas in 41 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 10. Cytology was successful in 33/41 cancer patients (80.5%): percutaneous aspiration was positive in 15/20 (75%) cases, and peroperative aspiration in 18/25 (72%). The difference between the two methods was not significant. Neither technique gave false positives in chronic pancreatitis. In none of the 51 patients was relevant morbidity reported. These cytological studies are at present accurate and mostly safer than histologic examinations. In particular ultrasound-guided percutaneous aspiration should be given precedence, since it provides preoperative confirmation of the tumor, thus obviating the need for exploratory laparotomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-78
Number of pages4
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume33
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Fine Needle Biopsy
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Chronic Pancreatitis
Neoplasms
Laparotomy
Needles
Cell Biology
Autopsy
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Savarino, V., Ceppa, P., Biggi, E., Arcuri, V., Mansi, C., & Celle, G. (1986). Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 33(2), 75-78.

Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. / Savarino, V.; Ceppa, P.; Biggi, E.; Arcuri, V.; Mansi, C.; Celle, G.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1986, p. 75-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savarino, V, Ceppa, P, Biggi, E, Arcuri, V, Mansi, C & Celle, G 1986, 'Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer', Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 75-78.
Savarino, V. ; Ceppa, P. ; Biggi, E. ; Arcuri, V. ; Mansi, C. ; Celle, G. / Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In: Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1986 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 75-78.
@article{cfa8a7c9c4944fe9a390450c7c42f3a3,
title = "Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer",
abstract = "A consecutive series of 51 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were studied in order to evaluate the contribution of cytologic data in establishing a definitive diagnosis of the tumor. A percutaneous ultrasonically-guided, and a peroperative fine-needle, aspriation were performed in 26 and 29 patients respectively; 4 cases underwent both methods. Final histologic diagnosis in surgical or autopsy specimens showed cancer of the pancreas in 41 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 10. Cytology was successful in 33/41 cancer patients (80.5{\%}): percutaneous aspiration was positive in 15/20 (75{\%}) cases, and peroperative aspiration in 18/25 (72{\%}). The difference between the two methods was not significant. Neither technique gave false positives in chronic pancreatitis. In none of the 51 patients was relevant morbidity reported. These cytological studies are at present accurate and mostly safer than histologic examinations. In particular ultrasound-guided percutaneous aspiration should be given precedence, since it provides preoperative confirmation of the tumor, thus obviating the need for exploratory laparotomy.",
author = "V. Savarino and P. Ceppa and E. Biggi and V. Arcuri and C. Mansi and G. Celle",
year = "1986",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "75--78",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of percutaneous and peroperative fine-needle aspirations in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

AU - Savarino, V.

AU - Ceppa, P.

AU - Biggi, E.

AU - Arcuri, V.

AU - Mansi, C.

AU - Celle, G.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - A consecutive series of 51 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were studied in order to evaluate the contribution of cytologic data in establishing a definitive diagnosis of the tumor. A percutaneous ultrasonically-guided, and a peroperative fine-needle, aspriation were performed in 26 and 29 patients respectively; 4 cases underwent both methods. Final histologic diagnosis in surgical or autopsy specimens showed cancer of the pancreas in 41 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 10. Cytology was successful in 33/41 cancer patients (80.5%): percutaneous aspiration was positive in 15/20 (75%) cases, and peroperative aspiration in 18/25 (72%). The difference between the two methods was not significant. Neither technique gave false positives in chronic pancreatitis. In none of the 51 patients was relevant morbidity reported. These cytological studies are at present accurate and mostly safer than histologic examinations. In particular ultrasound-guided percutaneous aspiration should be given precedence, since it provides preoperative confirmation of the tumor, thus obviating the need for exploratory laparotomy.

AB - A consecutive series of 51 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer were studied in order to evaluate the contribution of cytologic data in establishing a definitive diagnosis of the tumor. A percutaneous ultrasonically-guided, and a peroperative fine-needle, aspriation were performed in 26 and 29 patients respectively; 4 cases underwent both methods. Final histologic diagnosis in surgical or autopsy specimens showed cancer of the pancreas in 41 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 10. Cytology was successful in 33/41 cancer patients (80.5%): percutaneous aspiration was positive in 15/20 (75%) cases, and peroperative aspiration in 18/25 (72%). The difference between the two methods was not significant. Neither technique gave false positives in chronic pancreatitis. In none of the 51 patients was relevant morbidity reported. These cytological studies are at present accurate and mostly safer than histologic examinations. In particular ultrasound-guided percutaneous aspiration should be given precedence, since it provides preoperative confirmation of the tumor, thus obviating the need for exploratory laparotomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022572718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022572718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3721390

AN - SCOPUS:0022572718

VL - 33

SP - 75

EP - 78

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 2

ER -