Comparing in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment: Problems and prospects

Emilio Benfenati, Giuseppina Gini, Sebastian Hoffmann, Robert Luttik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The RAINBOW workshop addressed the background for the integration of in vivo, in vitro and computer-based (in silico) methods, to facilitate the study of the toxic properties of chemicals. On the basis of these discussions, we prepared the present paper, outlining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each approach, both alone and integrated into a single testing strategy. The current scheme for evaluation of chemicals needs to be reshaped, in the face of the much larger numbers of chemicals which need to be examined and the availability of a diversified set of tools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-166
Number of pages14
JournalATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Volume38
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Poisons
Computer Simulation
Education
Availability
Testing
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • In silico
  • In vitro
  • Integrated testing strategy
  • SWOT analysis
  • Toxicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Toxicology
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Comparing in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment : Problems and prospects. / Benfenati, Emilio; Gini, Giuseppina; Hoffmann, Sebastian; Luttik, Robert.

In: ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Vol. 38, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 153-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7f7b99700c049f1a6a7d52424811100,
title = "Comparing in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment: Problems and prospects",
abstract = "The RAINBOW workshop addressed the background for the integration of in vivo, in vitro and computer-based (in silico) methods, to facilitate the study of the toxic properties of chemicals. On the basis of these discussions, we prepared the present paper, outlining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each approach, both alone and integrated into a single testing strategy. The current scheme for evaluation of chemicals needs to be reshaped, in the face of the much larger numbers of chemicals which need to be examined and the availability of a diversified set of tools.",
keywords = "In silico, In vitro, Integrated testing strategy, SWOT analysis, Toxicity",
author = "Emilio Benfenati and Giuseppina Gini and Sebastian Hoffmann and Robert Luttik",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "153--166",
journal = "ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals",
issn = "0261-1929",
publisher = "FRAME",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment

T2 - Problems and prospects

AU - Benfenati, Emilio

AU - Gini, Giuseppina

AU - Hoffmann, Sebastian

AU - Luttik, Robert

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - The RAINBOW workshop addressed the background for the integration of in vivo, in vitro and computer-based (in silico) methods, to facilitate the study of the toxic properties of chemicals. On the basis of these discussions, we prepared the present paper, outlining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each approach, both alone and integrated into a single testing strategy. The current scheme for evaluation of chemicals needs to be reshaped, in the face of the much larger numbers of chemicals which need to be examined and the availability of a diversified set of tools.

AB - The RAINBOW workshop addressed the background for the integration of in vivo, in vitro and computer-based (in silico) methods, to facilitate the study of the toxic properties of chemicals. On the basis of these discussions, we prepared the present paper, outlining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each approach, both alone and integrated into a single testing strategy. The current scheme for evaluation of chemicals needs to be reshaped, in the face of the much larger numbers of chemicals which need to be examined and the availability of a diversified set of tools.

KW - In silico

KW - In vitro

KW - Integrated testing strategy

KW - SWOT analysis

KW - Toxicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953849205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953849205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20507186

AN - SCOPUS:77953849205

VL - 38

SP - 153

EP - 166

JO - ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

JF - ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

SN - 0261-1929

IS - 2

ER -