Comparing the effects of hydrotherapy and land-based therapy on balance in patients with Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled pilot study

Daniele Volpe, Maria Giulia Giantin, Roberto Maestri, Giuseppe Frazzitta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a hydrotherapy treatment in patients with Parkinsons disease and the effectiveness of this treatment on balance parameters in comparison to a traditional landbased physical therapy. Design: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Outpatients. Subjects: Thirty-four patients with Parkinsons disease in Hoehn-Yahr stage 2.5-3. Intervention: Group 1 hydrotherapy treatment, group 2 land-based rehabilitation treatment. The two groups underwent the same rehabilitation period (60 minutes of treatment, five days a week for two months). Main measures: The primary outcome measures were the centre of the pressure sway area recorded with open and closed eyes, using a stabilometric platform. Secondary outcome measures were Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale II and III, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, Falls diary and Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire-39. Results: Hydrotherapy treatment proved to be feasible and safe. Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in all outcome variables. There was a better improvement in patients who underwent hydrotherapy than in patients treated with land-based therapy in the centre of pressure sway area closed eyes (mean SD change: 45.4 SD64.9 vs. 6.9 SD45.3, p = 0.05), Berg Balance Scale (51.2 SD3.1 vs. 6.0 SD3.1, p = 0.005), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (16.8 SD10.6 vs. 4.1 SD5.4, p = 0.0001), Falls Efficacy Scale (-5.9 SD4.8 vs. -1.9 SD1.4, p = 0.003), Parkinsons Disease Quetionnaire-39 (-18.4 SD12.9 vs. -8.0 SD7.0, p = 0.006) and falls diary (-2.4 SD2.2 vs. -0.4 SD0.5, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that hydrotherapy may constitute a possible treatment for balance dysfunction in Parkinsonian patients with moderate stage of disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1210-1217
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 26 2014

Fingerprint

Hydrotherapy
Parkinson Disease
Therapeutics
Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pressure
Outpatients

Keywords

  • Balance
  • hydrotherapy
  • Parkinson's disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparing the effects of hydrotherapy and land-based therapy on balance in patients with Parkinson's disease : A randomized controlled pilot study. / Volpe, Daniele; Giantin, Maria Giulia; Maestri, Roberto; Frazzitta, Giuseppe.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 28, No. 12, 26.12.2014, p. 1210-1217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{575e93c545df4983be3ec32892ae53c7,
title = "Comparing the effects of hydrotherapy and land-based therapy on balance in patients with Parkinson's disease: A randomized controlled pilot study",
abstract = "Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a hydrotherapy treatment in patients with Parkinsons disease and the effectiveness of this treatment on balance parameters in comparison to a traditional landbased physical therapy. Design: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Outpatients. Subjects: Thirty-four patients with Parkinsons disease in Hoehn-Yahr stage 2.5-3. Intervention: Group 1 hydrotherapy treatment, group 2 land-based rehabilitation treatment. The two groups underwent the same rehabilitation period (60 minutes of treatment, five days a week for two months). Main measures: The primary outcome measures were the centre of the pressure sway area recorded with open and closed eyes, using a stabilometric platform. Secondary outcome measures were Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale II and III, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, Falls diary and Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire-39. Results: Hydrotherapy treatment proved to be feasible and safe. Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in all outcome variables. There was a better improvement in patients who underwent hydrotherapy than in patients treated with land-based therapy in the centre of pressure sway area closed eyes (mean SD change: 45.4 SD64.9 vs. 6.9 SD45.3, p = 0.05), Berg Balance Scale (51.2 SD3.1 vs. 6.0 SD3.1, p = 0.005), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (16.8 SD10.6 vs. 4.1 SD5.4, p = 0.0001), Falls Efficacy Scale (-5.9 SD4.8 vs. -1.9 SD1.4, p = 0.003), Parkinsons Disease Quetionnaire-39 (-18.4 SD12.9 vs. -8.0 SD7.0, p = 0.006) and falls diary (-2.4 SD2.2 vs. -0.4 SD0.5, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that hydrotherapy may constitute a possible treatment for balance dysfunction in Parkinsonian patients with moderate stage of disease.",
keywords = "Balance, hydrotherapy, Parkinson's disease",
author = "Daniele Volpe and Giantin, {Maria Giulia} and Roberto Maestri and Giuseppe Frazzitta",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1177/0269215514536060",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1210--1217",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the effects of hydrotherapy and land-based therapy on balance in patients with Parkinson's disease

T2 - A randomized controlled pilot study

AU - Volpe, Daniele

AU - Giantin, Maria Giulia

AU - Maestri, Roberto

AU - Frazzitta, Giuseppe

PY - 2014/12/26

Y1 - 2014/12/26

N2 - Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a hydrotherapy treatment in patients with Parkinsons disease and the effectiveness of this treatment on balance parameters in comparison to a traditional landbased physical therapy. Design: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Outpatients. Subjects: Thirty-four patients with Parkinsons disease in Hoehn-Yahr stage 2.5-3. Intervention: Group 1 hydrotherapy treatment, group 2 land-based rehabilitation treatment. The two groups underwent the same rehabilitation period (60 minutes of treatment, five days a week for two months). Main measures: The primary outcome measures were the centre of the pressure sway area recorded with open and closed eyes, using a stabilometric platform. Secondary outcome measures were Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale II and III, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, Falls diary and Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire-39. Results: Hydrotherapy treatment proved to be feasible and safe. Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in all outcome variables. There was a better improvement in patients who underwent hydrotherapy than in patients treated with land-based therapy in the centre of pressure sway area closed eyes (mean SD change: 45.4 SD64.9 vs. 6.9 SD45.3, p = 0.05), Berg Balance Scale (51.2 SD3.1 vs. 6.0 SD3.1, p = 0.005), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (16.8 SD10.6 vs. 4.1 SD5.4, p = 0.0001), Falls Efficacy Scale (-5.9 SD4.8 vs. -1.9 SD1.4, p = 0.003), Parkinsons Disease Quetionnaire-39 (-18.4 SD12.9 vs. -8.0 SD7.0, p = 0.006) and falls diary (-2.4 SD2.2 vs. -0.4 SD0.5, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that hydrotherapy may constitute a possible treatment for balance dysfunction in Parkinsonian patients with moderate stage of disease.

AB - Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a hydrotherapy treatment in patients with Parkinsons disease and the effectiveness of this treatment on balance parameters in comparison to a traditional landbased physical therapy. Design: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Outpatients. Subjects: Thirty-four patients with Parkinsons disease in Hoehn-Yahr stage 2.5-3. Intervention: Group 1 hydrotherapy treatment, group 2 land-based rehabilitation treatment. The two groups underwent the same rehabilitation period (60 minutes of treatment, five days a week for two months). Main measures: The primary outcome measures were the centre of the pressure sway area recorded with open and closed eyes, using a stabilometric platform. Secondary outcome measures were Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale II and III, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale, Falls diary and Parkinsons Disease Questionnaire-39. Results: Hydrotherapy treatment proved to be feasible and safe. Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in all outcome variables. There was a better improvement in patients who underwent hydrotherapy than in patients treated with land-based therapy in the centre of pressure sway area closed eyes (mean SD change: 45.4 SD64.9 vs. 6.9 SD45.3, p = 0.05), Berg Balance Scale (51.2 SD3.1 vs. 6.0 SD3.1, p = 0.005), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (16.8 SD10.6 vs. 4.1 SD5.4, p = 0.0001), Falls Efficacy Scale (-5.9 SD4.8 vs. -1.9 SD1.4, p = 0.003), Parkinsons Disease Quetionnaire-39 (-18.4 SD12.9 vs. -8.0 SD7.0, p = 0.006) and falls diary (-2.4 SD2.2 vs. -0.4 SD0.5, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that hydrotherapy may constitute a possible treatment for balance dysfunction in Parkinsonian patients with moderate stage of disease.

KW - Balance

KW - hydrotherapy

KW - Parkinson's disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921665834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921665834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215514536060

DO - 10.1177/0269215514536060

M3 - Article

C2 - 24895382

AN - SCOPUS:84921665834

VL - 28

SP - 1210

EP - 1217

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 12

ER -