Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer

F. Barzanti, M. Dal Susino, A. Volpi, D. Amadori, A. Riccobon, E. Scarpi, L. Medri, L. Bernardi, S. Naldi, M. Aldi, M. Gaudio, W. Zoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cell kinetics holds a prominent role among biological factors in predicting clinical outcome and response to treatment in neoplastic patients. Different cell kinetic variables are often considered as valid alternatives to each other, but the limited size of case series analysed in several studies and the lack of simultaneous determinations of all the variables on the same tumours do not justify this conclusion. In the present study, the correlation between [3H]thymidine labelling index ([3H]dT LI), flow cytometric S phase cell fraction (FCM-S) and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (Ki-67/MIB-1) was verified and the type of correlation with the most important clinical, pathological and biological patient and tumour characteristics was investigated in a very large series of breast cancer patients. Ki-67/MIB-1, FCM-S and [3H]dT LI were determined in 609, 526 and 485 patients, respectively, and all three cell proliferation indices were evaluated in parallel on the same tumour in a series of 330 breast cancer patients. All the cell kinetic determinations were performed within the context of National Quality Control Programmes. Very poor correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.37 to 0.18) were observed between the different cell kinetic variables determined in parallel on the same series of breast cancers. Moreover, Ki-67/MIB-1 and FCM-S showed a significant relationship with histological type, grade and tumour size, whereas statistically significant correlations were not observed for [3H]dT LI. In conclusion, the results show that the different cell kinetic variables provide different biological information and cannot be considered as alternatives to each other.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-89
Number of pages15
JournalCell Proliferation
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Biological Factors
S Phase
Quality Control
Thymidine
Cell Proliferation
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Barzanti, F., Dal Susino, M., Volpi, A., Amadori, D., Riccobon, A., Scarpi, E., ... Zoli, W. (2000). Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer. Cell Proliferation, 33(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00165.x

Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer. / Barzanti, F.; Dal Susino, M.; Volpi, A.; Amadori, D.; Riccobon, A.; Scarpi, E.; Medri, L.; Bernardi, L.; Naldi, S.; Aldi, M.; Gaudio, M.; Zoli, W.

In: Cell Proliferation, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2000, p. 75-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barzanti, F, Dal Susino, M, Volpi, A, Amadori, D, Riccobon, A, Scarpi, E, Medri, L, Bernardi, L, Naldi, S, Aldi, M, Gaudio, M & Zoli, W 2000, 'Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer', Cell Proliferation, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00165.x
Barzanti, F. ; Dal Susino, M. ; Volpi, A. ; Amadori, D. ; Riccobon, A. ; Scarpi, E. ; Medri, L. ; Bernardi, L. ; Naldi, S. ; Aldi, M. ; Gaudio, M. ; Zoli, W. / Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer. In: Cell Proliferation. 2000 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 75-89.
@article{36b9967d5f924f3881acc0ed4247a41e,
title = "Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer",
abstract = "Cell kinetics holds a prominent role among biological factors in predicting clinical outcome and response to treatment in neoplastic patients. Different cell kinetic variables are often considered as valid alternatives to each other, but the limited size of case series analysed in several studies and the lack of simultaneous determinations of all the variables on the same tumours do not justify this conclusion. In the present study, the correlation between [3H]thymidine labelling index ([3H]dT LI), flow cytometric S phase cell fraction (FCM-S) and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (Ki-67/MIB-1) was verified and the type of correlation with the most important clinical, pathological and biological patient and tumour characteristics was investigated in a very large series of breast cancer patients. Ki-67/MIB-1, FCM-S and [3H]dT LI were determined in 609, 526 and 485 patients, respectively, and all three cell proliferation indices were evaluated in parallel on the same tumour in a series of 330 breast cancer patients. All the cell kinetic determinations were performed within the context of National Quality Control Programmes. Very poor correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.37 to 0.18) were observed between the different cell kinetic variables determined in parallel on the same series of breast cancers. Moreover, Ki-67/MIB-1 and FCM-S showed a significant relationship with histological type, grade and tumour size, whereas statistically significant correlations were not observed for [3H]dT LI. In conclusion, the results show that the different cell kinetic variables provide different biological information and cannot be considered as alternatives to each other.",
author = "F. Barzanti and {Dal Susino}, M. and A. Volpi and D. Amadori and A. Riccobon and E. Scarpi and L. Medri and L. Bernardi and S. Naldi and M. Aldi and M. Gaudio and W. Zoli",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00165.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "75--89",
journal = "Cell Proliferation",
issn = "0960-7722",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer

AU - Barzanti, F.

AU - Dal Susino, M.

AU - Volpi, A.

AU - Amadori, D.

AU - Riccobon, A.

AU - Scarpi, E.

AU - Medri, L.

AU - Bernardi, L.

AU - Naldi, S.

AU - Aldi, M.

AU - Gaudio, M.

AU - Zoli, W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Cell kinetics holds a prominent role among biological factors in predicting clinical outcome and response to treatment in neoplastic patients. Different cell kinetic variables are often considered as valid alternatives to each other, but the limited size of case series analysed in several studies and the lack of simultaneous determinations of all the variables on the same tumours do not justify this conclusion. In the present study, the correlation between [3H]thymidine labelling index ([3H]dT LI), flow cytometric S phase cell fraction (FCM-S) and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (Ki-67/MIB-1) was verified and the type of correlation with the most important clinical, pathological and biological patient and tumour characteristics was investigated in a very large series of breast cancer patients. Ki-67/MIB-1, FCM-S and [3H]dT LI were determined in 609, 526 and 485 patients, respectively, and all three cell proliferation indices were evaluated in parallel on the same tumour in a series of 330 breast cancer patients. All the cell kinetic determinations were performed within the context of National Quality Control Programmes. Very poor correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.37 to 0.18) were observed between the different cell kinetic variables determined in parallel on the same series of breast cancers. Moreover, Ki-67/MIB-1 and FCM-S showed a significant relationship with histological type, grade and tumour size, whereas statistically significant correlations were not observed for [3H]dT LI. In conclusion, the results show that the different cell kinetic variables provide different biological information and cannot be considered as alternatives to each other.

AB - Cell kinetics holds a prominent role among biological factors in predicting clinical outcome and response to treatment in neoplastic patients. Different cell kinetic variables are often considered as valid alternatives to each other, but the limited size of case series analysed in several studies and the lack of simultaneous determinations of all the variables on the same tumours do not justify this conclusion. In the present study, the correlation between [3H]thymidine labelling index ([3H]dT LI), flow cytometric S phase cell fraction (FCM-S) and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (Ki-67/MIB-1) was verified and the type of correlation with the most important clinical, pathological and biological patient and tumour characteristics was investigated in a very large series of breast cancer patients. Ki-67/MIB-1, FCM-S and [3H]dT LI were determined in 609, 526 and 485 patients, respectively, and all three cell proliferation indices were evaluated in parallel on the same tumour in a series of 330 breast cancer patients. All the cell kinetic determinations were performed within the context of National Quality Control Programmes. Very poor correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.37 to 0.18) were observed between the different cell kinetic variables determined in parallel on the same series of breast cancers. Moreover, Ki-67/MIB-1 and FCM-S showed a significant relationship with histological type, grade and tumour size, whereas statistically significant correlations were not observed for [3H]dT LI. In conclusion, the results show that the different cell kinetic variables provide different biological information and cannot be considered as alternatives to each other.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034123054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034123054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00165.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00165.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 10845252

AN - SCOPUS:0034123054

VL - 33

SP - 75

EP - 89

JO - Cell Proliferation

JF - Cell Proliferation

SN - 0960-7722

IS - 2

ER -