Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?

Daniele Poole, Carlotta Rossi, Nicola Latronico, Giancarlo Rossi, Stefano Finazzi, Guido Bertolini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically ill patients. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality. Conclusions: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1280-1288
Number of pages9
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Hospital Mortality
Mortality
Calibration
Simplified Acute Physiology Score
Critical Illness
ROC Curve
Observational Studies
Intensive Care Units
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • APACHE
  • Critical care
  • Logistic models
  • Prognosis
  • SAPS
  • Severity of illness index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better? / Poole, Daniele; Rossi, Carlotta; Latronico, Nicola; Rossi, Giancarlo; Finazzi, Stefano; Bertolini, Guido.

In: Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 8, 08.2012, p. 1280-1288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poole, Daniele ; Rossi, Carlotta ; Latronico, Nicola ; Rossi, Giancarlo ; Finazzi, Stefano ; Bertolini, Guido. / Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?. In: Intensive Care Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 1280-1288.
@article{4a5abb2399d14be187c886143e4acccd,
title = "Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?",
abstract = "Purpose: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically ill patients. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 {\%} CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 {\%} CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality. Conclusions: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.",
keywords = "APACHE, Critical care, Logistic models, Prognosis, SAPS, Severity of illness index",
author = "Daniele Poole and Carlotta Rossi and Nicola Latronico and Giancarlo Rossi and Stefano Finazzi and Guido Bertolini",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00134-012-2578-0",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1280--1288",
journal = "Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0342-4642",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better?

AU - Poole, Daniele

AU - Rossi, Carlotta

AU - Latronico, Nicola

AU - Rossi, Giancarlo

AU - Finazzi, Stefano

AU - Bertolini, Guido

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Purpose: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically ill patients. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality. Conclusions: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.

AB - Purpose: More recent severity scores should be more reliable than older ones because they account for the improvement in medical care over time. To provide more insight into this issue, we compared the predictive ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and SAPS 3 (originally developed from data collected in 1991-1992 and 2002, respectively) on a sample of critically ill patients. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 3,661 patients from 103 Italian intensive care units. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Assessment of calibration across risk classes was performed using the GiViTI calibration belt. Discrimination was evaluated by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Both scores were shown to discriminate fairly. SAPS 3 largely overpredicted mortality, more than SAPS II (SMR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.60-0.66 vs. 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.91). This result was consistent and statistically significant across all risk classes for SAPS 3. SAPS II did not show relevant deviations from ideal calibration in the first two deciles of risk, whereas in higher-risk classes it overpredicted mortality. Conclusions: Both scores provided unreliable predictions, but unexpectedly the newer SAPS 3 turned out to overpredict mortality more than the older SAPS II.

KW - APACHE

KW - Critical care

KW - Logistic models

KW - Prognosis

KW - SAPS

KW - Severity of illness index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864277654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864277654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00134-012-2578-0

DO - 10.1007/s00134-012-2578-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 22584793

AN - SCOPUS:84864277654

VL - 38

SP - 1280

EP - 1288

JO - Intensive Care Medicine

JF - Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0342-4642

IS - 8

ER -