Comparison of cardiac computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance for characterization of left atrium anatomy before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Gianluca Pontone, Daniele Andreini, Erika Bertella, Maria Petullà, Eleonora Russo, Ester Innocenti, Saima Mushtaq, Paola Gripari, Monica Loguercio, Chiara Segurini, Andrea Baggiano, Edoardo Conte, Virginia Beltrama, Andrea Annoni, Alberto Formenti, Andrea I. Guaricci, Michela Casella, Gaetano Fassini, Marta Giovannardi, Fabrizio VegliaClaudio Tondo, Mauro Pepi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been improved by the pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging such as cardiac computed tomography (CCT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the characterization of left atrium (LA) anatomy before RFCA. The aim of this study is to compare the procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and clinical outcomes between RFCA guided by image integration with CCT versus CMR. Methods Four-hundred patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF referred to RCFA were matched with the propensity score matching analysis to CCT (n: 200) or CMR (n: 200) for evaluation of LA before RFCA procedure. Left atrium diameter, left atrium volume, variant of pulmonary veins' anatomy, pulmonary veins' ostial dimensions, procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and rate of AF recurrence after RFCA were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The 2 groups were homogeneous with similar follow-up (557 ± 302 vs. 523 ± 265 days, respectively, p:0.24). The CCT group showed higher LA volume vs. CMR group (117 ± 46 vs. 101 ± 40 mL, p <0.001). No differences were observed regarding procedural characteristics. AF recurrence at follow-up was similar (29% vs. 26%, p:0.5) despite a higher radiation exposure in the CCT group vs. CMR group (40.4 ± 23.7 mSv vs. 32.8 ± 23.5 mSv, p <0.005). LA volume detected by CMR was the most robust independent predictor of AF recurrence at multivariate analysis [(HR: 1.08 (1.01-1.15), p: 0.02]. Conclusions CCT and CMR provide similar information before RFCA. However, RFCA CMR-guided is associated with a lower overall cumulative radiation despite similar outcome in comparison with CCT-guided RFCA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-121
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume179
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 20 2015

Fingerprint

Catheter Ablation
Heart Atria
Atrial Fibrillation
Anatomy
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Tomography
Pulmonary Veins
Recurrence
Propensity Score
Cardiac Volume
Multivariate Analysis
Radiation
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Computed tomography
  • Magnetic resonance
  • Outcome
  • Pulmonary veins ablation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{ab7b52c5caf64aa6b4383ff90a7af214,
title = "Comparison of cardiac computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance for characterization of left atrium anatomy before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation",
abstract = "Background The outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been improved by the pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging such as cardiac computed tomography (CCT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the characterization of left atrium (LA) anatomy before RFCA. The aim of this study is to compare the procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and clinical outcomes between RFCA guided by image integration with CCT versus CMR. Methods Four-hundred patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF referred to RCFA were matched with the propensity score matching analysis to CCT (n: 200) or CMR (n: 200) for evaluation of LA before RFCA procedure. Left atrium diameter, left atrium volume, variant of pulmonary veins' anatomy, pulmonary veins' ostial dimensions, procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and rate of AF recurrence after RFCA were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The 2 groups were homogeneous with similar follow-up (557 ± 302 vs. 523 ± 265 days, respectively, p:0.24). The CCT group showed higher LA volume vs. CMR group (117 ± 46 vs. 101 ± 40 mL, p <0.001). No differences were observed regarding procedural characteristics. AF recurrence at follow-up was similar (29{\%} vs. 26{\%}, p:0.5) despite a higher radiation exposure in the CCT group vs. CMR group (40.4 ± 23.7 mSv vs. 32.8 ± 23.5 mSv, p <0.005). LA volume detected by CMR was the most robust independent predictor of AF recurrence at multivariate analysis [(HR: 1.08 (1.01-1.15), p: 0.02]. Conclusions CCT and CMR provide similar information before RFCA. However, RFCA CMR-guided is associated with a lower overall cumulative radiation despite similar outcome in comparison with CCT-guided RFCA.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance, Outcome, Pulmonary veins ablation",
author = "Gianluca Pontone and Daniele Andreini and Erika Bertella and Maria Petull{\`a} and Eleonora Russo and Ester Innocenti and Saima Mushtaq and Paola Gripari and Monica Loguercio and Chiara Segurini and Andrea Baggiano and Edoardo Conte and Virginia Beltrama and Andrea Annoni and Alberto Formenti and Guaricci, {Andrea I.} and Michela Casella and Gaetano Fassini and Marta Giovannardi and Fabrizio Veglia and Claudio Tondo and Mauro Pepi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.030",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
pages = "114--121",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of cardiac computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance for characterization of left atrium anatomy before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

AU - Pontone, Gianluca

AU - Andreini, Daniele

AU - Bertella, Erika

AU - Petullà, Maria

AU - Russo, Eleonora

AU - Innocenti, Ester

AU - Mushtaq, Saima

AU - Gripari, Paola

AU - Loguercio, Monica

AU - Segurini, Chiara

AU - Baggiano, Andrea

AU - Conte, Edoardo

AU - Beltrama, Virginia

AU - Annoni, Andrea

AU - Formenti, Alberto

AU - Guaricci, Andrea I.

AU - Casella, Michela

AU - Fassini, Gaetano

AU - Giovannardi, Marta

AU - Veglia, Fabrizio

AU - Tondo, Claudio

AU - Pepi, Mauro

PY - 2015/1/20

Y1 - 2015/1/20

N2 - Background The outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been improved by the pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging such as cardiac computed tomography (CCT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the characterization of left atrium (LA) anatomy before RFCA. The aim of this study is to compare the procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and clinical outcomes between RFCA guided by image integration with CCT versus CMR. Methods Four-hundred patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF referred to RCFA were matched with the propensity score matching analysis to CCT (n: 200) or CMR (n: 200) for evaluation of LA before RFCA procedure. Left atrium diameter, left atrium volume, variant of pulmonary veins' anatomy, pulmonary veins' ostial dimensions, procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and rate of AF recurrence after RFCA were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The 2 groups were homogeneous with similar follow-up (557 ± 302 vs. 523 ± 265 days, respectively, p:0.24). The CCT group showed higher LA volume vs. CMR group (117 ± 46 vs. 101 ± 40 mL, p <0.001). No differences were observed regarding procedural characteristics. AF recurrence at follow-up was similar (29% vs. 26%, p:0.5) despite a higher radiation exposure in the CCT group vs. CMR group (40.4 ± 23.7 mSv vs. 32.8 ± 23.5 mSv, p <0.005). LA volume detected by CMR was the most robust independent predictor of AF recurrence at multivariate analysis [(HR: 1.08 (1.01-1.15), p: 0.02]. Conclusions CCT and CMR provide similar information before RFCA. However, RFCA CMR-guided is associated with a lower overall cumulative radiation despite similar outcome in comparison with CCT-guided RFCA.

AB - Background The outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been improved by the pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging such as cardiac computed tomography (CCT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the characterization of left atrium (LA) anatomy before RFCA. The aim of this study is to compare the procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and clinical outcomes between RFCA guided by image integration with CCT versus CMR. Methods Four-hundred patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF referred to RCFA were matched with the propensity score matching analysis to CCT (n: 200) or CMR (n: 200) for evaluation of LA before RFCA procedure. Left atrium diameter, left atrium volume, variant of pulmonary veins' anatomy, pulmonary veins' ostial dimensions, procedural characteristics, overall radiation exposure and rate of AF recurrence after RFCA were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The 2 groups were homogeneous with similar follow-up (557 ± 302 vs. 523 ± 265 days, respectively, p:0.24). The CCT group showed higher LA volume vs. CMR group (117 ± 46 vs. 101 ± 40 mL, p <0.001). No differences were observed regarding procedural characteristics. AF recurrence at follow-up was similar (29% vs. 26%, p:0.5) despite a higher radiation exposure in the CCT group vs. CMR group (40.4 ± 23.7 mSv vs. 32.8 ± 23.5 mSv, p <0.005). LA volume detected by CMR was the most robust independent predictor of AF recurrence at multivariate analysis [(HR: 1.08 (1.01-1.15), p: 0.02]. Conclusions CCT and CMR provide similar information before RFCA. However, RFCA CMR-guided is associated with a lower overall cumulative radiation despite similar outcome in comparison with CCT-guided RFCA.

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Magnetic resonance

KW - Outcome

KW - Pulmonary veins ablation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920660853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920660853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.030

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 25464427

AN - SCOPUS:84920660853

VL - 179

SP - 114

EP - 121

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -