Comparison of different computed radiography systems: Physical characterization and contrast detail analysis

Stefano Rivetti, Nico Lanconelli, Marco Bertolini, Andrea Nitrosi, Aldo Burani, Domenico Acchiappati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, five different units based on three different technologies-traditional computed radiography (CR) units with granular phosphor and single-side reading, granular phosphor and dual-side reading, and columnar phosphor and line-scanning reading-are compared in terms of physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. Methods: The physical characterization of the five systems was obtained with the standard beam condition RQA5. Three of the units have been developed by FUJIFILM (FCR ST-VI, FCR ST-BD, and FCR Velocity U), one by Kodak (Direct View CR 975), and one by Agfa (DX-S). The quantitative comparison is based on the calculation of the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Noise investigation was also achieved by using a relative standard deviation analysis. Psychophysical characterization is assessed by performing a contrast detail analysis with an automatic reading of CDRAD images. Results: The most advanced units based on columnar phosphors provide MTF values in line or better than those from conventional CR systems. The greater thickness of the columnar phosphor improves the efficiency, allowing for enhanced noise properties. In fact, NPS values for standard CR systems are remarkably higher for all the investigated exposures and especially for frequencies up to 3.5 lp/mm. As a consequence, DQE values for the three units based on columnar phosphors and line-scanning reading, or granular phosphor and dual-side reading, are neatly better than those from conventional CR systems. Actually, DQE values of about 40% are easily achievable for all the investigated exposures. Conclusions: This study suggests that systems based on the dual-side reading or line-scanning reading with columnar phosphors provide a remarkable improvement when compared to conventional CR units and yield results in line with those obtained from most digital detectors for radiography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-448
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Physics
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Radiography
Reading
Noise
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Technology

Keywords

  • Columnar phosphor
  • Computed radiography
  • DQE
  • Dual-side reading
  • Line-scanning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comparison of different computed radiography systems : Physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. / Rivetti, Stefano; Lanconelli, Nico; Bertolini, Marco; Nitrosi, Andrea; Burani, Aldo; Acchiappati, Domenico.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2010, p. 440-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rivetti, Stefano ; Lanconelli, Nico ; Bertolini, Marco ; Nitrosi, Andrea ; Burani, Aldo ; Acchiappati, Domenico. / Comparison of different computed radiography systems : Physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. In: Medical Physics. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 440-448.
@article{898239fcd792466ab8a5c95c3d22303f,
title = "Comparison of different computed radiography systems: Physical characterization and contrast detail analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: In this study, five different units based on three different technologies-traditional computed radiography (CR) units with granular phosphor and single-side reading, granular phosphor and dual-side reading, and columnar phosphor and line-scanning reading-are compared in terms of physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. Methods: The physical characterization of the five systems was obtained with the standard beam condition RQA5. Three of the units have been developed by FUJIFILM (FCR ST-VI, FCR ST-BD, and FCR Velocity U), one by Kodak (Direct View CR 975), and one by Agfa (DX-S). The quantitative comparison is based on the calculation of the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Noise investigation was also achieved by using a relative standard deviation analysis. Psychophysical characterization is assessed by performing a contrast detail analysis with an automatic reading of CDRAD images. Results: The most advanced units based on columnar phosphors provide MTF values in line or better than those from conventional CR systems. The greater thickness of the columnar phosphor improves the efficiency, allowing for enhanced noise properties. In fact, NPS values for standard CR systems are remarkably higher for all the investigated exposures and especially for frequencies up to 3.5 lp/mm. As a consequence, DQE values for the three units based on columnar phosphors and line-scanning reading, or granular phosphor and dual-side reading, are neatly better than those from conventional CR systems. Actually, DQE values of about 40{\%} are easily achievable for all the investigated exposures. Conclusions: This study suggests that systems based on the dual-side reading or line-scanning reading with columnar phosphors provide a remarkable improvement when compared to conventional CR units and yield results in line with those obtained from most digital detectors for radiography.",
keywords = "Columnar phosphor, Computed radiography, DQE, Dual-side reading, Line-scanning",
author = "Stefano Rivetti and Nico Lanconelli and Marco Bertolini and Andrea Nitrosi and Aldo Burani and Domenico Acchiappati",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1118/1.3284539",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "440--448",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different computed radiography systems

T2 - Physical characterization and contrast detail analysis

AU - Rivetti, Stefano

AU - Lanconelli, Nico

AU - Bertolini, Marco

AU - Nitrosi, Andrea

AU - Burani, Aldo

AU - Acchiappati, Domenico

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: In this study, five different units based on three different technologies-traditional computed radiography (CR) units with granular phosphor and single-side reading, granular phosphor and dual-side reading, and columnar phosphor and line-scanning reading-are compared in terms of physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. Methods: The physical characterization of the five systems was obtained with the standard beam condition RQA5. Three of the units have been developed by FUJIFILM (FCR ST-VI, FCR ST-BD, and FCR Velocity U), one by Kodak (Direct View CR 975), and one by Agfa (DX-S). The quantitative comparison is based on the calculation of the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Noise investigation was also achieved by using a relative standard deviation analysis. Psychophysical characterization is assessed by performing a contrast detail analysis with an automatic reading of CDRAD images. Results: The most advanced units based on columnar phosphors provide MTF values in line or better than those from conventional CR systems. The greater thickness of the columnar phosphor improves the efficiency, allowing for enhanced noise properties. In fact, NPS values for standard CR systems are remarkably higher for all the investigated exposures and especially for frequencies up to 3.5 lp/mm. As a consequence, DQE values for the three units based on columnar phosphors and line-scanning reading, or granular phosphor and dual-side reading, are neatly better than those from conventional CR systems. Actually, DQE values of about 40% are easily achievable for all the investigated exposures. Conclusions: This study suggests that systems based on the dual-side reading or line-scanning reading with columnar phosphors provide a remarkable improvement when compared to conventional CR units and yield results in line with those obtained from most digital detectors for radiography.

AB - Purpose: In this study, five different units based on three different technologies-traditional computed radiography (CR) units with granular phosphor and single-side reading, granular phosphor and dual-side reading, and columnar phosphor and line-scanning reading-are compared in terms of physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. Methods: The physical characterization of the five systems was obtained with the standard beam condition RQA5. Three of the units have been developed by FUJIFILM (FCR ST-VI, FCR ST-BD, and FCR Velocity U), one by Kodak (Direct View CR 975), and one by Agfa (DX-S). The quantitative comparison is based on the calculation of the modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Noise investigation was also achieved by using a relative standard deviation analysis. Psychophysical characterization is assessed by performing a contrast detail analysis with an automatic reading of CDRAD images. Results: The most advanced units based on columnar phosphors provide MTF values in line or better than those from conventional CR systems. The greater thickness of the columnar phosphor improves the efficiency, allowing for enhanced noise properties. In fact, NPS values for standard CR systems are remarkably higher for all the investigated exposures and especially for frequencies up to 3.5 lp/mm. As a consequence, DQE values for the three units based on columnar phosphors and line-scanning reading, or granular phosphor and dual-side reading, are neatly better than those from conventional CR systems. Actually, DQE values of about 40% are easily achievable for all the investigated exposures. Conclusions: This study suggests that systems based on the dual-side reading or line-scanning reading with columnar phosphors provide a remarkable improvement when compared to conventional CR units and yield results in line with those obtained from most digital detectors for radiography.

KW - Columnar phosphor

KW - Computed radiography

KW - DQE

KW - Dual-side reading

KW - Line-scanning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75749153339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75749153339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3284539

DO - 10.1118/1.3284539

M3 - Article

C2 - 20229852

AN - SCOPUS:75749153339

VL - 37

SP - 440

EP - 448

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 2

ER -