Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings

A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation

Parastoo Dehkordi, Farzad Khosrow-Khavar, Marco Di Rienzo, Omer T. Inan, Samuel E. Schmidt, Andrew P. Blaber, Kasper Sørensen, Johannes J. Struijk, Vahid Zakeri, Prospero Lombardi, Md Mobashir H. Shandhi, Mojtaba Borairi, John M. Zanetti, Kouhyar Tavakolian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cardiac time intervals are important hemodynamic indices and provide information about left ventricular performance. Phonocardiography (PCG), impedance cardiography (ICG), and recently, seismocardiography (SCG) have been unobtrusive methods of choice for detection of cardiac time intervals and have potentials to be integrated into wearable devices. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of beat-to-beat extraction of cardiac timings from the PCG, ICG and SCG recordings in comparison to multimodal echocardiography (Doppler, TDI, and M-mode) as the gold clinical standard. Recordings were obtained from 86 healthy adults and in total 2,120 cardiac cycles were analyzed. For estimation of the pre-ejection period (PEP), 43% of ICG annotations fell in the corresponding echocardiography ranges while this was 86% for SCG. For estimation of the total systolic time (TST), these numbers were 43, 80, and 90% for ICG, PCG, and SCG, respectively. In summary, SCG and PCG signals provided an acceptable accuracy and precision in estimating cardiac timings, as compared to ICG.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1057
JournalFrontiers in Physiology
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 22 2019

Fingerprint

Impedance Cardiography
Phonocardiography
Echocardiography
Doppler Echocardiography
Gold
Hemodynamics
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • cardiac time intervals
  • echocardiography
  • impedance cardiography (ICG)
  • left ventricular ejection time (LVET)
  • phonocardiography (PCG)
  • pre-ejection period (PEP)
  • seismocardiography (SCG)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings : A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation. / Dehkordi, Parastoo; Khosrow-Khavar, Farzad; Di Rienzo, Marco; Inan, Omer T.; Schmidt, Samuel E.; Blaber, Andrew P.; Sørensen, Kasper; Struijk, Johannes J.; Zakeri, Vahid; Lombardi, Prospero; Shandhi, Md Mobashir H.; Borairi, Mojtaba; Zanetti, John M.; Tavakolian, Kouhyar.

In: Frontiers in Physiology, Vol. 10, 1057, 22.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dehkordi, P, Khosrow-Khavar, F, Di Rienzo, M, Inan, OT, Schmidt, SE, Blaber, AP, Sørensen, K, Struijk, JJ, Zakeri, V, Lombardi, P, Shandhi, MMH, Borairi, M, Zanetti, JM & Tavakolian, K 2019, 'Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings: A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation', Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 10, 1057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01057
Dehkordi, Parastoo ; Khosrow-Khavar, Farzad ; Di Rienzo, Marco ; Inan, Omer T. ; Schmidt, Samuel E. ; Blaber, Andrew P. ; Sørensen, Kasper ; Struijk, Johannes J. ; Zakeri, Vahid ; Lombardi, Prospero ; Shandhi, Md Mobashir H. ; Borairi, Mojtaba ; Zanetti, John M. ; Tavakolian, Kouhyar. / Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings : A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation. In: Frontiers in Physiology. 2019 ; Vol. 10.
@article{bbb9251092104571af8a78b795dd6082,
title = "Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings: A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation",
abstract = "Cardiac time intervals are important hemodynamic indices and provide information about left ventricular performance. Phonocardiography (PCG), impedance cardiography (ICG), and recently, seismocardiography (SCG) have been unobtrusive methods of choice for detection of cardiac time intervals and have potentials to be integrated into wearable devices. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of beat-to-beat extraction of cardiac timings from the PCG, ICG and SCG recordings in comparison to multimodal echocardiography (Doppler, TDI, and M-mode) as the gold clinical standard. Recordings were obtained from 86 healthy adults and in total 2,120 cardiac cycles were analyzed. For estimation of the pre-ejection period (PEP), 43{\%} of ICG annotations fell in the corresponding echocardiography ranges while this was 86{\%} for SCG. For estimation of the total systolic time (TST), these numbers were 43, 80, and 90{\%} for ICG, PCG, and SCG, respectively. In summary, SCG and PCG signals provided an acceptable accuracy and precision in estimating cardiac timings, as compared to ICG.",
keywords = "cardiac time intervals, echocardiography, impedance cardiography (ICG), left ventricular ejection time (LVET), phonocardiography (PCG), pre-ejection period (PEP), seismocardiography (SCG)",
author = "Parastoo Dehkordi and Farzad Khosrow-Khavar and {Di Rienzo}, Marco and Inan, {Omer T.} and Schmidt, {Samuel E.} and Blaber, {Andrew P.} and Kasper S{\o}rensen and Struijk, {Johannes J.} and Vahid Zakeri and Prospero Lombardi and Shandhi, {Md Mobashir H.} and Mojtaba Borairi and Zanetti, {John M.} and Kouhyar Tavakolian",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3389/fphys.2019.01057",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Frontiers in Physiology",
issn = "1664-042X",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings

T2 - A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation

AU - Dehkordi, Parastoo

AU - Khosrow-Khavar, Farzad

AU - Di Rienzo, Marco

AU - Inan, Omer T.

AU - Schmidt, Samuel E.

AU - Blaber, Andrew P.

AU - Sørensen, Kasper

AU - Struijk, Johannes J.

AU - Zakeri, Vahid

AU - Lombardi, Prospero

AU - Shandhi, Md Mobashir H.

AU - Borairi, Mojtaba

AU - Zanetti, John M.

AU - Tavakolian, Kouhyar

PY - 2019/8/22

Y1 - 2019/8/22

N2 - Cardiac time intervals are important hemodynamic indices and provide information about left ventricular performance. Phonocardiography (PCG), impedance cardiography (ICG), and recently, seismocardiography (SCG) have been unobtrusive methods of choice for detection of cardiac time intervals and have potentials to be integrated into wearable devices. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of beat-to-beat extraction of cardiac timings from the PCG, ICG and SCG recordings in comparison to multimodal echocardiography (Doppler, TDI, and M-mode) as the gold clinical standard. Recordings were obtained from 86 healthy adults and in total 2,120 cardiac cycles were analyzed. For estimation of the pre-ejection period (PEP), 43% of ICG annotations fell in the corresponding echocardiography ranges while this was 86% for SCG. For estimation of the total systolic time (TST), these numbers were 43, 80, and 90% for ICG, PCG, and SCG, respectively. In summary, SCG and PCG signals provided an acceptable accuracy and precision in estimating cardiac timings, as compared to ICG.

AB - Cardiac time intervals are important hemodynamic indices and provide information about left ventricular performance. Phonocardiography (PCG), impedance cardiography (ICG), and recently, seismocardiography (SCG) have been unobtrusive methods of choice for detection of cardiac time intervals and have potentials to be integrated into wearable devices. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of beat-to-beat extraction of cardiac timings from the PCG, ICG and SCG recordings in comparison to multimodal echocardiography (Doppler, TDI, and M-mode) as the gold clinical standard. Recordings were obtained from 86 healthy adults and in total 2,120 cardiac cycles were analyzed. For estimation of the pre-ejection period (PEP), 43% of ICG annotations fell in the corresponding echocardiography ranges while this was 86% for SCG. For estimation of the total systolic time (TST), these numbers were 43, 80, and 90% for ICG, PCG, and SCG, respectively. In summary, SCG and PCG signals provided an acceptable accuracy and precision in estimating cardiac timings, as compared to ICG.

KW - cardiac time intervals

KW - echocardiography

KW - impedance cardiography (ICG)

KW - left ventricular ejection time (LVET)

KW - phonocardiography (PCG)

KW - pre-ejection period (PEP)

KW - seismocardiography (SCG)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072217118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072217118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2019.01057

DO - 10.3389/fphys.2019.01057

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Frontiers in Physiology

JF - Frontiers in Physiology

SN - 1664-042X

M1 - 1057

ER -