Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing

Goran Stankovic; Antonio Colombo; Robert Bersin; Jeffrey Popma; Samin Sharma; Louis A. Cannon; Paul Gordon; Dean Nukta; Gregory Braden; Michael Collins

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047

Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing

Goran Stankovic, Antonio Colombo, Robert Bersin, Jeffrey Popma, Samin Sharma, Louis A. Cannon, Paul Gordon, Dean Nukta, Gregory Braden, Michael Collins

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Late lumen loss after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is mainly determined by arterial remodeling. We hypothesized that stent implantation after optimal lesion debulking could be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. A total of 753 patients with de novo or restenotic coronary lesions were prospectively randomized to DCA plus stenting (n = 381) or stenting alone (n = 372). The patients were followed for 12 months. Procedural success was achieved in 91.5% versus 97.3% (p = 0.0007) of patients treated with DCA plus stent versus stent alone. Optimal atherectomy (

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	953-958
Number of pages	6
Journal	The American Journal of Cardiology
Volume	93
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047
Publication status	Published - Apr 15 2004

Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Stankovic, G., Colombo, A., Bersin, R., Popma, J., Sharma, S., Cannon, L. A., Gordon, P., Nukta, D., Braden, G., & Collins, M. (2004). Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing. The American Journal of Cardiology, 93(8), 953-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047

Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing. / Stankovic, Goran; Colombo, Antonio; Bersin, Robert; Popma, Jeffrey; Sharma, Samin; Cannon, Louis A.; Gordon, Paul; Nukta, Dean; Braden, Gregory; Collins, Michael.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 93, No. 8, 15.04.2004, p. 953-958.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Stankovic, G, Colombo, A, Bersin, R, Popma, J, Sharma, S, Cannon, LA, Gordon, P, Nukta, D, Braden, G & Collins, M 2004, 'Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing', The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 953-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047

Stankovic, Goran ; Colombo, Antonio ; Bersin, Robert ; Popma, Jeffrey ; Sharma, Samin ; Cannon, Louis A. ; Gordon, Paul ; Nukta, Dean ; Braden, Gregory ; Collins, Michael. / Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 2004 ; Vol. 93, No. 8. pp. 953-958.

@article{1f5732d1b22a40a38caef85d789d859d,

title = "Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing",

abstract = "Late lumen loss after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is mainly determined by arterial remodeling. We hypothesized that stent implantation after optimal lesion debulking could be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. A total of 753 patients with de novo or restenotic coronary lesions were prospectively randomized to DCA plus stenting (n = 381) or stenting alone (n = 372). The patients were followed for 12 months. Procedural success was achieved in 91.5% versus 97.3% (p = 0.0007) of patients treated with DCA plus stent versus stent alone. Optimal atherectomy (",

author = "Goran Stankovic and Antonio Colombo and Robert Bersin and Jeffrey Popma and Samin Sharma and Cannon, {Louis A.} and Paul Gordon and Dean Nukta and Gregory Braden and Michael Collins",

year = "2004",

month = apr

day = "15",

doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047",

language = "English",

volume = "93",

pages = "953--958",

journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",

issn = "0002-9149",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing

AU - Stankovic, Goran

AU - Colombo, Antonio

AU - Bersin, Robert

AU - Popma, Jeffrey

AU - Sharma, Samin

AU - Cannon, Louis A.

AU - Gordon, Paul

AU - Nukta, Dean

AU - Braden, Gregory

AU - Collins, Michael

PY - 2004/4/15

Y1 - 2004/4/15

N2 - Late lumen loss after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is mainly determined by arterial remodeling. We hypothesized that stent implantation after optimal lesion debulking could be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. A total of 753 patients with de novo or restenotic coronary lesions were prospectively randomized to DCA plus stenting (n = 381) or stenting alone (n = 372). The patients were followed for 12 months. Procedural success was achieved in 91.5% versus 97.3% (p = 0.0007) of patients treated with DCA plus stent versus stent alone. Optimal atherectomy (

AB - Late lumen loss after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) is mainly determined by arterial remodeling. We hypothesized that stent implantation after optimal lesion debulking could be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. A total of 753 patients with de novo or restenotic coronary lesions were prospectively randomized to DCA plus stenting (n = 381) or stenting alone (n = 372). The patients were followed for 12 months. Procedural success was achieved in 91.5% versus 97.3% (p = 0.0007) of patients treated with DCA plus stent versus stent alone. Optimal atherectomy (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144356789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11144356789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 15081434

AN - SCOPUS:11144356789

VL - 93

SP - 953

EP - 958

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 8

ER -

Access to Document

10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.047