Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent

Yoshio Kobayashi, Joseph De Gregorio, Nobuyuki Kobayashi, Bernhard Reimers, Remo Albiero, Marco Vaghetti, Leo Finci, Carlo Di Mario, Antonio Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The intrinsic characteristics of a stent including stent length may affect both procedural success and long-term outcome. The present study evaluated the immediate and follow-up results after implantation of the short and long NIR stent and compared these results with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. Between July 1995 and December 1996, stenting with a 16-mm NIR stent (NIR-16), a 32-mm NIR stent (NIR-32), or a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS) was performed in 68, 57, and 155 lesions, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidences of delivery failure (PS, 2.6%: NIR-16, 4.4%; NIR-32, 5.3%; p = NS) and procedural success (PS, 92%; NIR-16, 93%; NIR-32, 93%; p = NS) among the 3 groups. The reference vessel diameter was smaller in lesions with a 32-mm NIR stent than in those with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS, 3.14 ± 0.58, NIR-16, 3.00 ± 0.50; NIR-32, 2.90 ± 0.47 mm; p

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-504
Number of pages6
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume84
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 1999

Fingerprint

Stents
montirelin
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Kobayashi, Y., De Gregorio, J., Kobayashi, N., Reimers, B., Albiero, R., Vaghetti, M., ... Colombo, A. (1999). Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent. The American Journal of Cardiology, 84(5), 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00366-5

Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent. / Kobayashi, Yoshio; De Gregorio, Joseph; Kobayashi, Nobuyuki; Reimers, Bernhard; Albiero, Remo; Vaghetti, Marco; Finci, Leo; Di Mario, Carlo; Colombo, Antonio.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 84, No. 5, 01.09.1999, p. 499-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kobayashi, Y, De Gregorio, J, Kobayashi, N, Reimers, B, Albiero, R, Vaghetti, M, Finci, L, Di Mario, C & Colombo, A 1999, 'Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent', The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00366-5
Kobayashi, Yoshio ; De Gregorio, Joseph ; Kobayashi, Nobuyuki ; Reimers, Bernhard ; Albiero, Remo ; Vaghetti, Marco ; Finci, Leo ; Di Mario, Carlo ; Colombo, Antonio. / Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 1999 ; Vol. 84, No. 5. pp. 499-504.
@article{581ecc08cf7a438f926a6eee049cfcdf,
title = "Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent",
abstract = "The intrinsic characteristics of a stent including stent length may affect both procedural success and long-term outcome. The present study evaluated the immediate and follow-up results after implantation of the short and long NIR stent and compared these results with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. Between July 1995 and December 1996, stenting with a 16-mm NIR stent (NIR-16), a 32-mm NIR stent (NIR-32), or a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS) was performed in 68, 57, and 155 lesions, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidences of delivery failure (PS, 2.6{\%}: NIR-16, 4.4{\%}; NIR-32, 5.3{\%}; p = NS) and procedural success (PS, 92{\%}; NIR-16, 93{\%}; NIR-32, 93{\%}; p = NS) among the 3 groups. The reference vessel diameter was smaller in lesions with a 32-mm NIR stent than in those with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS, 3.14 ± 0.58, NIR-16, 3.00 ± 0.50; NIR-32, 2.90 ± 0.47 mm; p",
author = "Yoshio Kobayashi and {De Gregorio}, Joseph and Nobuyuki Kobayashi and Bernhard Reimers and Remo Albiero and Marco Vaghetti and Leo Finci and {Di Mario}, Carlo and Antonio Colombo",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00366-5",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "499--504",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the palmaz-schatz stent

AU - Kobayashi, Yoshio

AU - De Gregorio, Joseph

AU - Kobayashi, Nobuyuki

AU - Reimers, Bernhard

AU - Albiero, Remo

AU - Vaghetti, Marco

AU - Finci, Leo

AU - Di Mario, Carlo

AU - Colombo, Antonio

PY - 1999/9/1

Y1 - 1999/9/1

N2 - The intrinsic characteristics of a stent including stent length may affect both procedural success and long-term outcome. The present study evaluated the immediate and follow-up results after implantation of the short and long NIR stent and compared these results with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. Between July 1995 and December 1996, stenting with a 16-mm NIR stent (NIR-16), a 32-mm NIR stent (NIR-32), or a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS) was performed in 68, 57, and 155 lesions, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidences of delivery failure (PS, 2.6%: NIR-16, 4.4%; NIR-32, 5.3%; p = NS) and procedural success (PS, 92%; NIR-16, 93%; NIR-32, 93%; p = NS) among the 3 groups. The reference vessel diameter was smaller in lesions with a 32-mm NIR stent than in those with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS, 3.14 ± 0.58, NIR-16, 3.00 ± 0.50; NIR-32, 2.90 ± 0.47 mm; p

AB - The intrinsic characteristics of a stent including stent length may affect both procedural success and long-term outcome. The present study evaluated the immediate and follow-up results after implantation of the short and long NIR stent and compared these results with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. Between July 1995 and December 1996, stenting with a 16-mm NIR stent (NIR-16), a 32-mm NIR stent (NIR-32), or a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS) was performed in 68, 57, and 155 lesions, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidences of delivery failure (PS, 2.6%: NIR-16, 4.4%; NIR-32, 5.3%; p = NS) and procedural success (PS, 92%; NIR-16, 93%; NIR-32, 93%; p = NS) among the 3 groups. The reference vessel diameter was smaller in lesions with a 32-mm NIR stent than in those with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS, 3.14 ± 0.58, NIR-16, 3.00 ± 0.50; NIR-32, 2.90 ± 0.47 mm; p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032855353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032855353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00366-5

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00366-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 10482144

AN - SCOPUS:0032855353

VL - 84

SP - 499

EP - 504

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 5

ER -