Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of silicone and polymethyl methacrylate during the curing phase of polymerization

Wei Song, Joseph Seta, Michael K. Eichler, Jacobus J. Arts, Bronek M. Boszczyk, David C. Markel, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Weiping Ren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Adverse events have been reported with acrylic bone cements. However, current test standards for acrylic materials fail to characterize the potentially harmful monomers released during the curing stage. In clinical applications, materials are implanted into the human body during this phase. Silicone may be a safer alternative to acrylic cements. Silicone is used in medical applications for its biocompatibility and stability characteristics. Previously, no study has been completed which compares silicone to acrylic cements. In this study, both materials were injected into the cell medium during the curing process which more accurately reflects clinical use of material. Initially, cell cultures followed ASTM standard F813-07 which fails to capture the effects of monomer released during curing. Subsequently, a modified cell culture method was employed which evaluated cytotoxicity while the materials cured. The objective of this study was to capture toxicity data during curing phase. Thus, the test method employed measured and excluded the impact of the exothermic reaction temperature of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on cell growth. The concentration of PMMA monomer was measured at 1 and 24 h after injecting PMMA into culture plates in a manner consistent with established cell growth methodologies. Our results indicate current in vitro cytotoxicity assays recommended by ASTM standards are unable to reveal the real cytotoxic effect caused by methyl methacrylate monomers during polymerization. Our modified experiment can more accurately illustrate the true nature of the toxicity of materials and improve assay results. In these tests, silicone based elastomeric polymers showed excellent cytocompatibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2693-2699
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
Volume106
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Polymethyl Methacrylate
Silicones
Polymethyl methacrylates
Biocompatibility
Polymerization
Curing
Acrylics
Monomers
Cell culture
Cell Culture Techniques
Cell growth
Cytotoxicity
Methylmethacrylate
Toxicity
Assays
Cements
Growth
Human Body
Bone cement
Polymers

Keywords

  • Acrylic
  • Biocompatibility/hard tissue
  • Bone cement-PMMA
  • Cell-material interactions
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Silicone elastomeric polymer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of silicone and polymethyl methacrylate during the curing phase of polymerization. / Song, Wei; Seta, Joseph; Eichler, Michael K.; Arts, Jacobus J.; Boszczyk, Bronek M.; Markel, David C.; Gasbarrini, Alessandro; Ren, Weiping.

In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 106, No. 7, 10.2018, p. 2693-2699.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Song, Wei ; Seta, Joseph ; Eichler, Michael K. ; Arts, Jacobus J. ; Boszczyk, Bronek M. ; Markel, David C. ; Gasbarrini, Alessandro ; Ren, Weiping. / Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of silicone and polymethyl methacrylate during the curing phase of polymerization. In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials. 2018 ; Vol. 106, No. 7. pp. 2693-2699.
@article{905911ecac71459d9b09a1d134eee41b,
title = "Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of silicone and polymethyl methacrylate during the curing phase of polymerization",
abstract = "Adverse events have been reported with acrylic bone cements. However, current test standards for acrylic materials fail to characterize the potentially harmful monomers released during the curing stage. In clinical applications, materials are implanted into the human body during this phase. Silicone may be a safer alternative to acrylic cements. Silicone is used in medical applications for its biocompatibility and stability characteristics. Previously, no study has been completed which compares silicone to acrylic cements. In this study, both materials were injected into the cell medium during the curing process which more accurately reflects clinical use of material. Initially, cell cultures followed ASTM standard F813-07 which fails to capture the effects of monomer released during curing. Subsequently, a modified cell culture method was employed which evaluated cytotoxicity while the materials cured. The objective of this study was to capture toxicity data during curing phase. Thus, the test method employed measured and excluded the impact of the exothermic reaction temperature of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on cell growth. The concentration of PMMA monomer was measured at 1 and 24 h after injecting PMMA into culture plates in a manner consistent with established cell growth methodologies. Our results indicate current in vitro cytotoxicity assays recommended by ASTM standards are unable to reveal the real cytotoxic effect caused by methyl methacrylate monomers during polymerization. Our modified experiment can more accurately illustrate the true nature of the toxicity of materials and improve assay results. In these tests, silicone based elastomeric polymers showed excellent cytocompatibility.",
keywords = "Acrylic, Biocompatibility/hard tissue, Bone cement-PMMA, Cell-material interactions, Cytotoxicity, Silicone elastomeric polymer",
author = "Wei Song and Joseph Seta and Eichler, {Michael K.} and Arts, {Jacobus J.} and Boszczyk, {Bronek M.} and Markel, {David C.} and Alessandro Gasbarrini and Weiping Ren",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/jbm.b.34086",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "2693--2699",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A",
issn = "1549-3296",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of silicone and polymethyl methacrylate during the curing phase of polymerization

AU - Song, Wei

AU - Seta, Joseph

AU - Eichler, Michael K.

AU - Arts, Jacobus J.

AU - Boszczyk, Bronek M.

AU - Markel, David C.

AU - Gasbarrini, Alessandro

AU - Ren, Weiping

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Adverse events have been reported with acrylic bone cements. However, current test standards for acrylic materials fail to characterize the potentially harmful monomers released during the curing stage. In clinical applications, materials are implanted into the human body during this phase. Silicone may be a safer alternative to acrylic cements. Silicone is used in medical applications for its biocompatibility and stability characteristics. Previously, no study has been completed which compares silicone to acrylic cements. In this study, both materials were injected into the cell medium during the curing process which more accurately reflects clinical use of material. Initially, cell cultures followed ASTM standard F813-07 which fails to capture the effects of monomer released during curing. Subsequently, a modified cell culture method was employed which evaluated cytotoxicity while the materials cured. The objective of this study was to capture toxicity data during curing phase. Thus, the test method employed measured and excluded the impact of the exothermic reaction temperature of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on cell growth. The concentration of PMMA monomer was measured at 1 and 24 h after injecting PMMA into culture plates in a manner consistent with established cell growth methodologies. Our results indicate current in vitro cytotoxicity assays recommended by ASTM standards are unable to reveal the real cytotoxic effect caused by methyl methacrylate monomers during polymerization. Our modified experiment can more accurately illustrate the true nature of the toxicity of materials and improve assay results. In these tests, silicone based elastomeric polymers showed excellent cytocompatibility.

AB - Adverse events have been reported with acrylic bone cements. However, current test standards for acrylic materials fail to characterize the potentially harmful monomers released during the curing stage. In clinical applications, materials are implanted into the human body during this phase. Silicone may be a safer alternative to acrylic cements. Silicone is used in medical applications for its biocompatibility and stability characteristics. Previously, no study has been completed which compares silicone to acrylic cements. In this study, both materials were injected into the cell medium during the curing process which more accurately reflects clinical use of material. Initially, cell cultures followed ASTM standard F813-07 which fails to capture the effects of monomer released during curing. Subsequently, a modified cell culture method was employed which evaluated cytotoxicity while the materials cured. The objective of this study was to capture toxicity data during curing phase. Thus, the test method employed measured and excluded the impact of the exothermic reaction temperature of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on cell growth. The concentration of PMMA monomer was measured at 1 and 24 h after injecting PMMA into culture plates in a manner consistent with established cell growth methodologies. Our results indicate current in vitro cytotoxicity assays recommended by ASTM standards are unable to reveal the real cytotoxic effect caused by methyl methacrylate monomers during polymerization. Our modified experiment can more accurately illustrate the true nature of the toxicity of materials and improve assay results. In these tests, silicone based elastomeric polymers showed excellent cytocompatibility.

KW - Acrylic

KW - Biocompatibility/hard tissue

KW - Bone cement-PMMA

KW - Cell-material interactions

KW - Cytotoxicity

KW - Silicone elastomeric polymer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042402381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042402381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbm.b.34086

DO - 10.1002/jbm.b.34086

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 2693

EP - 2699

JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

SN - 1549-3296

IS - 7

ER -