Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses

G. Valle, F. M. Petrini, I. Strauss, F. Iberite, E. D’Anna, G. Granata, M. Controzzi, C. Cipriani, T. Stieglitz, P. M. Rossini, A. Mazzoni, S. Raspopovic, S. Micera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that direct nerve stimulation can be used to provide sensory feedback to hand amputees. The intensity of the elicited sensations can be modulated using the amplitude or frequency of the injected stimuli. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of these two encoding strategies on the amputees’ ability to control a prosthesis has not been performed. In this paper, we assessed the performance of two trans-radial amputees controlling a myoelectric hand prosthesis while receiving grip force sensory feedback encoded using either linear modulation of amplitude (LAM) or linear modulation of frequency (LFM) of direct nerve stimulation (namely, bidirectional prostheses). Both subjects achieved similar and significantly above-chance performance when they were asked to exploit LAM or LFM in different tasks. The feedbacks allowed them to discriminate, during manipulation through the robotic hand, objects of different compliances and shapes or different placements on the prosthesis. Similar high performances were obtained when they were asked to apply different levels of force in a random order on a dynamometer using LAM or LFM. In contrast, only the LAM strategy allowed the subjects to continuously modulate the grip pressure on the dynamometer. Furthermore, when long-lasting trains of stimulation were delivered, LFM strategy generated a very fast adaptation phenomenon in the subjects, which caused them to stop perceiving the restored sensations. Both encoding approaches were perceived as very different from the touch feelings of the healthy limb (natural). These results suggest that the choice of specific sensory feedback encodings can have an effect on user performance while grasping. In addition, our results invite the development of new approaches to provide more natural sensory feelings to the users, which could be addressed by a more biomimetic strategy in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Article number16666
JournalScientific Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sensory Feedback
Amputees
Prostheses and Implants
Hand
Hand Strength
Emotions
Biomimetics
Aptitude
Touch
Robotics
Compliance
Extremities
Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses. / Valle, G.; Petrini, F. M.; Strauss, I.; Iberite, F.; D’Anna, E.; Granata, G.; Controzzi, M.; Cipriani, C.; Stieglitz, T.; Rossini, P. M.; Mazzoni, A.; Raspopovic, S.; Micera, S.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 16666, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valle, G, Petrini, FM, Strauss, I, Iberite, F, D’Anna, E, Granata, G, Controzzi, M, Cipriani, C, Stieglitz, T, Rossini, PM, Mazzoni, A, Raspopovic, S & Micera, S 2018, 'Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses', Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, 16666. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34910-w
Valle, G. ; Petrini, F. M. ; Strauss, I. ; Iberite, F. ; D’Anna, E. ; Granata, G. ; Controzzi, M. ; Cipriani, C. ; Stieglitz, T. ; Rossini, P. M. ; Mazzoni, A. ; Raspopovic, S. ; Micera, S. / Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses. In: Scientific Reports. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{28cd741aa68c4f5aa7c9aafec52fcb2b,
title = "Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that direct nerve stimulation can be used to provide sensory feedback to hand amputees. The intensity of the elicited sensations can be modulated using the amplitude or frequency of the injected stimuli. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of these two encoding strategies on the amputees’ ability to control a prosthesis has not been performed. In this paper, we assessed the performance of two trans-radial amputees controlling a myoelectric hand prosthesis while receiving grip force sensory feedback encoded using either linear modulation of amplitude (LAM) or linear modulation of frequency (LFM) of direct nerve stimulation (namely, bidirectional prostheses). Both subjects achieved similar and significantly above-chance performance when they were asked to exploit LAM or LFM in different tasks. The feedbacks allowed them to discriminate, during manipulation through the robotic hand, objects of different compliances and shapes or different placements on the prosthesis. Similar high performances were obtained when they were asked to apply different levels of force in a random order on a dynamometer using LAM or LFM. In contrast, only the LAM strategy allowed the subjects to continuously modulate the grip pressure on the dynamometer. Furthermore, when long-lasting trains of stimulation were delivered, LFM strategy generated a very fast adaptation phenomenon in the subjects, which caused them to stop perceiving the restored sensations. Both encoding approaches were perceived as very different from the touch feelings of the healthy limb (natural). These results suggest that the choice of specific sensory feedback encodings can have an effect on user performance while grasping. In addition, our results invite the development of new approaches to provide more natural sensory feelings to the users, which could be addressed by a more biomimetic strategy in the future.",
author = "G. Valle and Petrini, {F. M.} and I. Strauss and F. Iberite and E. D’Anna and G. Granata and M. Controzzi and C. Cipriani and T. Stieglitz and Rossini, {P. M.} and A. Mazzoni and S. Raspopovic and S. Micera",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-34910-w",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of linear frequency and amplitude modulation for intraneural sensory feedback in bidirectional hand prostheses

AU - Valle, G.

AU - Petrini, F. M.

AU - Strauss, I.

AU - Iberite, F.

AU - D’Anna, E.

AU - Granata, G.

AU - Controzzi, M.

AU - Cipriani, C.

AU - Stieglitz, T.

AU - Rossini, P. M.

AU - Mazzoni, A.

AU - Raspopovic, S.

AU - Micera, S.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Recent studies have shown that direct nerve stimulation can be used to provide sensory feedback to hand amputees. The intensity of the elicited sensations can be modulated using the amplitude or frequency of the injected stimuli. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of these two encoding strategies on the amputees’ ability to control a prosthesis has not been performed. In this paper, we assessed the performance of two trans-radial amputees controlling a myoelectric hand prosthesis while receiving grip force sensory feedback encoded using either linear modulation of amplitude (LAM) or linear modulation of frequency (LFM) of direct nerve stimulation (namely, bidirectional prostheses). Both subjects achieved similar and significantly above-chance performance when they were asked to exploit LAM or LFM in different tasks. The feedbacks allowed them to discriminate, during manipulation through the robotic hand, objects of different compliances and shapes or different placements on the prosthesis. Similar high performances were obtained when they were asked to apply different levels of force in a random order on a dynamometer using LAM or LFM. In contrast, only the LAM strategy allowed the subjects to continuously modulate the grip pressure on the dynamometer. Furthermore, when long-lasting trains of stimulation were delivered, LFM strategy generated a very fast adaptation phenomenon in the subjects, which caused them to stop perceiving the restored sensations. Both encoding approaches were perceived as very different from the touch feelings of the healthy limb (natural). These results suggest that the choice of specific sensory feedback encodings can have an effect on user performance while grasping. In addition, our results invite the development of new approaches to provide more natural sensory feelings to the users, which could be addressed by a more biomimetic strategy in the future.

AB - Recent studies have shown that direct nerve stimulation can be used to provide sensory feedback to hand amputees. The intensity of the elicited sensations can be modulated using the amplitude or frequency of the injected stimuli. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of these two encoding strategies on the amputees’ ability to control a prosthesis has not been performed. In this paper, we assessed the performance of two trans-radial amputees controlling a myoelectric hand prosthesis while receiving grip force sensory feedback encoded using either linear modulation of amplitude (LAM) or linear modulation of frequency (LFM) of direct nerve stimulation (namely, bidirectional prostheses). Both subjects achieved similar and significantly above-chance performance when they were asked to exploit LAM or LFM in different tasks. The feedbacks allowed them to discriminate, during manipulation through the robotic hand, objects of different compliances and shapes or different placements on the prosthesis. Similar high performances were obtained when they were asked to apply different levels of force in a random order on a dynamometer using LAM or LFM. In contrast, only the LAM strategy allowed the subjects to continuously modulate the grip pressure on the dynamometer. Furthermore, when long-lasting trains of stimulation were delivered, LFM strategy generated a very fast adaptation phenomenon in the subjects, which caused them to stop perceiving the restored sensations. Both encoding approaches were perceived as very different from the touch feelings of the healthy limb (natural). These results suggest that the choice of specific sensory feedback encodings can have an effect on user performance while grasping. In addition, our results invite the development of new approaches to provide more natural sensory feelings to the users, which could be addressed by a more biomimetic strategy in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056331821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056331821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-34910-w

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-34910-w

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 16666

ER -