Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling

Alessandro Ruggiero, Roberto D'Amato, Saverio Affatato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretization of the physical domain, and this procedure is called meshing. A well-designed mesh is necessary in order to achieve accurate results with an acceptable computational effort. The aim of this work is to test a finite element model to simulate the dry frictionless contact conditions of a hip joint prosthesis (a femoral head against an acetabular cup) in a soft bearing configuration by comparing the performances of 12 common meshing strategies. In the simulations, total deformation of the internal surface of the cup, contact pressure, and the equivalent von Mises stress are evaluated by using loads and kinematic conditions during a typical gait, obtained from a previous work using a musculoskeletal multibody model. Moreover, accounting for appropriate mesh quality metrics, the results are discussed, underlining the best choice we identified after the large amount of numerical simulations performed.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalMaterials
Volume12
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 23 2019

Fingerprint

Biomechanics
Bearings (structural)
Joint prostheses
Orthopedics
Loads (forces)
Kinematics
Computer simulation

Keywords

  • FEM
  • contact
  • hip joint
  • mesh
  • prosthesis
  • tribology

Cite this

Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling. / Ruggiero, Alessandro; D'Amato, Roberto; Affatato, Saverio.

In: Materials, Vol. 12, No. 14, 23.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruggiero, Alessandro ; D'Amato, Roberto ; Affatato, Saverio. / Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling. In: Materials. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 14.
@article{da44f90b57e14500a4775de1ae2e2f97,
title = "Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling",
abstract = "In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretization of the physical domain, and this procedure is called meshing. A well-designed mesh is necessary in order to achieve accurate results with an acceptable computational effort. The aim of this work is to test a finite element model to simulate the dry frictionless contact conditions of a hip joint prosthesis (a femoral head against an acetabular cup) in a soft bearing configuration by comparing the performances of 12 common meshing strategies. In the simulations, total deformation of the internal surface of the cup, contact pressure, and the equivalent von Mises stress are evaluated by using loads and kinematic conditions during a typical gait, obtained from a previous work using a musculoskeletal multibody model. Moreover, accounting for appropriate mesh quality metrics, the results are discussed, underlining the best choice we identified after the large amount of numerical simulations performed.",
keywords = "FEM, contact, hip joint, mesh, prosthesis, tribology",
author = "Alessandro Ruggiero and Roberto D'Amato and Saverio Affatato",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "23",
doi = "10.3390/ma12142332",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Materials",
issn = "1996-1944",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling

AU - Ruggiero, Alessandro

AU - D'Amato, Roberto

AU - Affatato, Saverio

PY - 2019/7/23

Y1 - 2019/7/23

N2 - In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretization of the physical domain, and this procedure is called meshing. A well-designed mesh is necessary in order to achieve accurate results with an acceptable computational effort. The aim of this work is to test a finite element model to simulate the dry frictionless contact conditions of a hip joint prosthesis (a femoral head against an acetabular cup) in a soft bearing configuration by comparing the performances of 12 common meshing strategies. In the simulations, total deformation of the internal surface of the cup, contact pressure, and the equivalent von Mises stress are evaluated by using loads and kinematic conditions during a typical gait, obtained from a previous work using a musculoskeletal multibody model. Moreover, accounting for appropriate mesh quality metrics, the results are discussed, underlining the best choice we identified after the large amount of numerical simulations performed.

AB - In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretization of the physical domain, and this procedure is called meshing. A well-designed mesh is necessary in order to achieve accurate results with an acceptable computational effort. The aim of this work is to test a finite element model to simulate the dry frictionless contact conditions of a hip joint prosthesis (a femoral head against an acetabular cup) in a soft bearing configuration by comparing the performances of 12 common meshing strategies. In the simulations, total deformation of the internal surface of the cup, contact pressure, and the equivalent von Mises stress are evaluated by using loads and kinematic conditions during a typical gait, obtained from a previous work using a musculoskeletal multibody model. Moreover, accounting for appropriate mesh quality metrics, the results are discussed, underlining the best choice we identified after the large amount of numerical simulations performed.

KW - FEM

KW - contact

KW - hip joint

KW - mesh

KW - prosthesis

KW - tribology

U2 - 10.3390/ma12142332

DO - 10.3390/ma12142332

M3 - Article

C2 - 31340439

VL - 12

JO - Materials

JF - Materials

SN - 1996-1944

IS - 14

ER -