Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera

Giacomo Savini, Piero Barboni, Michele Carbonelli, Kenneth J. Hoffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of corneal power measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in unoperated eyes and compare the results with those of simulated keratometry (SimK) performed with a Placido-disk corneal topographer (Keratron). Setting: Private practice. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: Eight Scheimpflug camera corneal power measurements were analyzed: (1) average K, (2) true net power calculated using the Gaussian optics formula, (3) total corneal refractive power at 2.0 mm calculated by ray tracing on a ring and (4) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (5) total corneal refractive power at 3.0 mm on a ring and (6) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (7) the equivalent K reading at 3.0 mm and (8) at 4.5 mm. The IOL power was calculated using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between any corneal power measurements, including simulated K, in 41 consecutive patients. The latter showed slightly lower mean absolute errors with all 3 formulas (range 0.26 to 0.27 diopter [D]). The Scheimpflug camera gave the lowest median absolute errors with all formulas; that is, the 3.0 mm equivalent K reading with the Hoffer Q formula (0.18 D) and Holladay 1 formula (0.17 D) and the 2.0 mm total corneal refractive power ring with the SRK/T formula (0.18 D). Conclusion: Corneal power measurements provided by the Scheimpflug camera and Placido disk corneal topographer displayed comparable accuracy in IOL power calculation. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)598-604
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lenses
Reading
Power (Psychology)
Private Practice
Disclosure
Routine Diagnostic Tests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. / Savini, Giacomo; Barboni, Piero; Carbonelli, Michele; Hoffer, Kenneth J.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 598-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4c11a31eb834456a6a9424179353bbc,
title = "Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the accuracy of corneal power measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in unoperated eyes and compare the results with those of simulated keratometry (SimK) performed with a Placido-disk corneal topographer (Keratron). Setting: Private practice. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: Eight Scheimpflug camera corneal power measurements were analyzed: (1) average K, (2) true net power calculated using the Gaussian optics formula, (3) total corneal refractive power at 2.0 mm calculated by ray tracing on a ring and (4) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (5) total corneal refractive power at 3.0 mm on a ring and (6) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (7) the equivalent K reading at 3.0 mm and (8) at 4.5 mm. The IOL power was calculated using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between any corneal power measurements, including simulated K, in 41 consecutive patients. The latter showed slightly lower mean absolute errors with all 3 formulas (range 0.26 to 0.27 diopter [D]). The Scheimpflug camera gave the lowest median absolute errors with all formulas; that is, the 3.0 mm equivalent K reading with the Hoffer Q formula (0.18 D) and Holladay 1 formula (0.17 D) and the 2.0 mm total corneal refractive power ring with the SRK/T formula (0.18 D). Conclusion: Corneal power measurements provided by the Scheimpflug camera and Placido disk corneal topographer displayed comparable accuracy in IOL power calculation. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Giacomo Savini and Piero Barboni and Michele Carbonelli and Hoffer, {Kenneth J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.022",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "598--604",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera

AU - Savini, Giacomo

AU - Barboni, Piero

AU - Carbonelli, Michele

AU - Hoffer, Kenneth J.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: To assess the accuracy of corneal power measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in unoperated eyes and compare the results with those of simulated keratometry (SimK) performed with a Placido-disk corneal topographer (Keratron). Setting: Private practice. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: Eight Scheimpflug camera corneal power measurements were analyzed: (1) average K, (2) true net power calculated using the Gaussian optics formula, (3) total corneal refractive power at 2.0 mm calculated by ray tracing on a ring and (4) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (5) total corneal refractive power at 3.0 mm on a ring and (6) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (7) the equivalent K reading at 3.0 mm and (8) at 4.5 mm. The IOL power was calculated using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between any corneal power measurements, including simulated K, in 41 consecutive patients. The latter showed slightly lower mean absolute errors with all 3 formulas (range 0.26 to 0.27 diopter [D]). The Scheimpflug camera gave the lowest median absolute errors with all formulas; that is, the 3.0 mm equivalent K reading with the Hoffer Q formula (0.18 D) and Holladay 1 formula (0.17 D) and the 2.0 mm total corneal refractive power ring with the SRK/T formula (0.18 D). Conclusion: Corneal power measurements provided by the Scheimpflug camera and Placido disk corneal topographer displayed comparable accuracy in IOL power calculation. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose: To assess the accuracy of corneal power measurements provided by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in unoperated eyes and compare the results with those of simulated keratometry (SimK) performed with a Placido-disk corneal topographer (Keratron). Setting: Private practice. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: Eight Scheimpflug camera corneal power measurements were analyzed: (1) average K, (2) true net power calculated using the Gaussian optics formula, (3) total corneal refractive power at 2.0 mm calculated by ray tracing on a ring and (4) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (5) total corneal refractive power at 3.0 mm on a ring and (6) as the average of the zone inside the ring, (7) the equivalent K reading at 3.0 mm and (8) at 4.5 mm. The IOL power was calculated using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between any corneal power measurements, including simulated K, in 41 consecutive patients. The latter showed slightly lower mean absolute errors with all 3 formulas (range 0.26 to 0.27 diopter [D]). The Scheimpflug camera gave the lowest median absolute errors with all formulas; that is, the 3.0 mm equivalent K reading with the Hoffer Q formula (0.18 D) and Holladay 1 formula (0.17 D) and the 2.0 mm total corneal refractive power ring with the SRK/T formula (0.18 D). Conclusion: Corneal power measurements provided by the Scheimpflug camera and Placido disk corneal topographer displayed comparable accuracy in IOL power calculation. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875415241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875415241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 23403064

AN - SCOPUS:84875415241

VL - 39

SP - 598

EP - 604

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 4

ER -