Neovesciche ortotopiche a confronto: Studer vs. Camey II modificata.

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison of orthotopic neobladders: Studer vs modified Camey II

P. Corrada, T. Torelli, G. Ordesi, F. Bergamaschi, L. Zanitzer, C. Santagati, M. Remotti, B. Campo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A comparative study between modified Camey II and Studer ileal orthotopic neobladder was performed. The Camey II was modified as follows: 1) The ureters were implanted, using wallace technique, in an undetubularized ileal loop, 15-18 cm. long, to prevent vesico-ureteral reflux; 2) The neobladder was made using staplers. In such a way, time is saved (about one hour) and results are quite similar, with a low rate of ureteral stenosis in both groups.

Translated title of the contributionComparison of orthotopic neobladders: Studer vs modified Camey II
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)289-291
Number of pages3
JournalArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
Volume68
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of orthotopic neobladders: Studer vs modified Camey II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this