Comparison of Performance of Different Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury

A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study

CENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators, Frederick A. Zeiler, Ari Ercole, Manuel Cabeleira, Marco Carbonara, Nino Stocchetti, David K. Menon, Peter Smielewski, Marek Czosnyka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been postulated previously that individualized cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets can be derived from cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Differences between real CPP and target CPP (named generically optimal CPP) has been linked to global outcome in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI). Different vascular reactivity indices can be utilized in the determination. The goal of this study is to evaluate CPPopt parameters, derived from three intracranial pressure (ICP)-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices, and determine which one is superior for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction. Using the prospectively collected data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, the following indices of cerebrovascular reactivity were derived: pressure reactivity index (PRx; correlation between ICP and mean arterial pressure [MAP]), pulse amplitude index (PAx; correlation between pulse amplitude of ICP [AMP] and MAP), and RAC (correlation between AMP and CPP). CPPopt was derived using each index. Univariate logistic regression models were created to assess the association between CPPopt with global dichotomized outcome at 6 to 12 months, as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended. Models were compared via area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Delong's Test. A total of 204 patients had available data. CPPopt derived from PRx, PAx, and RAC performed variably in their association with outcomes. PRx- and RAC-based CPPopt performed similarly, with RAC parameters trending towards highest AUC values. PAx-based CPPopt parameters failed to reach significant associations with dichotomized outcomes at 6 to 12 months. CPPopt parameters derived from PRx and RAC appear similar in their overall ability for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction in moderate/severe adult TBI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1505-1517
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 15 2019

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Intracranial Pressure
Research
Area Under Curve
Arterial Pressure
Logistic Models
Blood Vessels
Traumatic Brain Injury
Pressure

Keywords

  • autoregulation
  • CPP optimum
  • ICP indices
  • outcome analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Comparison of Performance of Different Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury : A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study. / CENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators; Zeiler, Frederick A.; Ercole, Ari; Cabeleira, Manuel; Carbonara, Marco; Stocchetti, Nino; Menon, David K.; Smielewski, Peter; Czosnyka, Marek.

In: Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 36, No. 10, 15.05.2019, p. 1505-1517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

CENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators ; Zeiler, Frederick A. ; Ercole, Ari ; Cabeleira, Manuel ; Carbonara, Marco ; Stocchetti, Nino ; Menon, David K. ; Smielewski, Peter ; Czosnyka, Marek. / Comparison of Performance of Different Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury : A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study. In: Journal of Neurotrauma. 2019 ; Vol. 36, No. 10. pp. 1505-1517.
@article{9bd89bbd505b48f8a34ba4ee3416173f,
title = "Comparison of Performance of Different Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study",
abstract = "It has been postulated previously that individualized cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets can be derived from cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Differences between real CPP and target CPP (named generically optimal CPP) has been linked to global outcome in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI). Different vascular reactivity indices can be utilized in the determination. The goal of this study is to evaluate CPPopt parameters, derived from three intracranial pressure (ICP)-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices, and determine which one is superior for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction. Using the prospectively collected data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, the following indices of cerebrovascular reactivity were derived: pressure reactivity index (PRx; correlation between ICP and mean arterial pressure [MAP]), pulse amplitude index (PAx; correlation between pulse amplitude of ICP [AMP] and MAP), and RAC (correlation between AMP and CPP). CPPopt was derived using each index. Univariate logistic regression models were created to assess the association between CPPopt with global dichotomized outcome at 6 to 12 months, as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended. Models were compared via area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Delong's Test. A total of 204 patients had available data. CPPopt derived from PRx, PAx, and RAC performed variably in their association with outcomes. PRx- and RAC-based CPPopt performed similarly, with RAC parameters trending towards highest AUC values. PAx-based CPPopt parameters failed to reach significant associations with dichotomized outcomes at 6 to 12 months. CPPopt parameters derived from PRx and RAC appear similar in their overall ability for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction in moderate/severe adult TBI.",
keywords = "autoregulation, CPP optimum, ICP indices, outcome analysis",
author = "{CENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators} and Zeiler, {Frederick A.} and Ari Ercole and Manuel Cabeleira and Marco Carbonara and Nino Stocchetti and Menon, {David K.} and Peter Smielewski and Marek Czosnyka",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1089/neu.2018.6182",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1505--1517",
journal = "Journal of Neurotrauma",
issn = "0897-7151",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Performance of Different Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury

T2 - A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study

AU - CENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators

AU - Zeiler, Frederick A.

AU - Ercole, Ari

AU - Cabeleira, Manuel

AU - Carbonara, Marco

AU - Stocchetti, Nino

AU - Menon, David K.

AU - Smielewski, Peter

AU - Czosnyka, Marek

PY - 2019/5/15

Y1 - 2019/5/15

N2 - It has been postulated previously that individualized cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets can be derived from cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Differences between real CPP and target CPP (named generically optimal CPP) has been linked to global outcome in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI). Different vascular reactivity indices can be utilized in the determination. The goal of this study is to evaluate CPPopt parameters, derived from three intracranial pressure (ICP)-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices, and determine which one is superior for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction. Using the prospectively collected data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, the following indices of cerebrovascular reactivity were derived: pressure reactivity index (PRx; correlation between ICP and mean arterial pressure [MAP]), pulse amplitude index (PAx; correlation between pulse amplitude of ICP [AMP] and MAP), and RAC (correlation between AMP and CPP). CPPopt was derived using each index. Univariate logistic regression models were created to assess the association between CPPopt with global dichotomized outcome at 6 to 12 months, as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended. Models were compared via area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Delong's Test. A total of 204 patients had available data. CPPopt derived from PRx, PAx, and RAC performed variably in their association with outcomes. PRx- and RAC-based CPPopt performed similarly, with RAC parameters trending towards highest AUC values. PAx-based CPPopt parameters failed to reach significant associations with dichotomized outcomes at 6 to 12 months. CPPopt parameters derived from PRx and RAC appear similar in their overall ability for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction in moderate/severe adult TBI.

AB - It has been postulated previously that individualized cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets can be derived from cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Differences between real CPP and target CPP (named generically optimal CPP) has been linked to global outcome in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI). Different vascular reactivity indices can be utilized in the determination. The goal of this study is to evaluate CPPopt parameters, derived from three intracranial pressure (ICP)-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices, and determine which one is superior for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction. Using the prospectively collected data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, the following indices of cerebrovascular reactivity were derived: pressure reactivity index (PRx; correlation between ICP and mean arterial pressure [MAP]), pulse amplitude index (PAx; correlation between pulse amplitude of ICP [AMP] and MAP), and RAC (correlation between AMP and CPP). CPPopt was derived using each index. Univariate logistic regression models were created to assess the association between CPPopt with global dichotomized outcome at 6 to 12 months, as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended. Models were compared via area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Delong's Test. A total of 204 patients had available data. CPPopt derived from PRx, PAx, and RAC performed variably in their association with outcomes. PRx- and RAC-based CPPopt performed similarly, with RAC parameters trending towards highest AUC values. PAx-based CPPopt parameters failed to reach significant associations with dichotomized outcomes at 6 to 12 months. CPPopt parameters derived from PRx and RAC appear similar in their overall ability for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction in moderate/severe adult TBI.

KW - autoregulation

KW - CPP optimum

KW - ICP indices

KW - outcome analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065531522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065531522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/neu.2018.6182

DO - 10.1089/neu.2018.6182

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1505

EP - 1517

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

SN - 0897-7151

IS - 10

ER -