Comparison of perihematomal perfusion in deep and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage

Andrea Morotti, Giorgio Busto, Andrea Bernardoni, Eleonora Leuci, Ilaria Casetta, Enrico Fainardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hypoperfusion in the perihematomal rim is common in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but its determinants remain incompletely characterized. Despite known biological differences between deep and lobar ICH, the association between ICH location and cerebral perfusion has not been investigated. We tested the hypothesis that perihematomal perfusion differs between deep and lobar ICH.

METHODS: Prospectively collected cohort of subjects with primary spontaneous ICH undergoing CT perfusion on admission. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) were measured in the manually outlined perihematomal low-density area. The association between perihematomal perfusion and ICH location was explored with multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were enrolled (59 with a lobar bleeding). In univariate analysis, median perihematomal CBF and CBV were lower in lobar ICH compared with deep ICH (23.8 vs 33.4 mL/100 g/min, p = 0.001 and 1.7 vs 2.3 mL/100 g, p = 0.001, respectively). Lobar ICH location remained inversely associated with CBF (β = - 0.17, p = 0.038) and CBV (β = - 0.19, p = 0.023) after adjustment for confounders in linear regression.

CONCLUSION: Lobar ICH location is inversely related with perihematomal CBF and CBV. Further studies are needed to confirm this association and define the underlying biological mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-261
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroradiology
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of perihematomal perfusion in deep and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this