TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous revascularization
AU - Savonitto, Stefano
AU - Ferri, Luca A.
AU - Piatti, Luigi
AU - Grosseto, Daniele
AU - Piovaccari, Giancarlo
AU - Morici, Nuccia
AU - Bossi, Irene
AU - Sganzerla, Paolo
AU - Tortorella, Giovanni
AU - Cacucci, Michele
AU - Ferrario, Maurizio
AU - Murena, Ernesto
AU - Sibilio, Girolamo
AU - Tondi, Stefano
AU - Toso, Anna
AU - Bongioanni, Sergio
AU - Ravera, Amelia
AU - Corrada, Elena
AU - Mariani, Matteo
AU - Di Ascenzo, Leonardo
AU - Sonia Petronio, A.
AU - Cavallini, Claudio
AU - Vitrella, Giancarlo
AU - Rogacka, Renata
AU - Antonicelli, Roberto
AU - Cesana, Bruno M.
AU - De Luca, Leonardo
AU - Ottani, Filippo
AU - De Luca, Giuseppe
AU - Piscione, Federico
AU - Moffa, Nadia
AU - De Servi, Stefano
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are at elevated risk of both ischemic and bleeding complications after an acute coronary syndrome and display higher on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity compared with younger patients. Prasugrel 5 mg provides more predictable platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel in the elderly, suggesting the possibility of reducing ischemic events without increasing bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial, we compared a once-daily maintenance dose of prasugrel 5 mg with the standard clopidogrel 75 mg in patients >74 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes or bleeding within 1 year. The study was designed to demonstrate superiority of prasugrel 5 mg over clopidogrel 75 mg. RESULTS: Enrollment was interrupted, according to prespecified criteria, after a planned interim analysis, when 1443 patients (40% women; mean age, 80 years) had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 12 months, because of futility for efficacy. The primary end point occurred in 121 patients (17%) with prasugrel and 121 (16.6%) with clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.007; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.30; P=0.955). Definite/ probable stent thrombosis rates were 0.7% with prasugrel versus 1.9% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.00; P=0.06). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2 and greater rates were 4.1% with prasugrel versus 2.7% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.16; P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: The present study in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes showed no difference in the primary end point between reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel. However, the study should be interpreted in light of the premature termination of the trial.
AB - BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are at elevated risk of both ischemic and bleeding complications after an acute coronary syndrome and display higher on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity compared with younger patients. Prasugrel 5 mg provides more predictable platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel in the elderly, suggesting the possibility of reducing ischemic events without increasing bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial, we compared a once-daily maintenance dose of prasugrel 5 mg with the standard clopidogrel 75 mg in patients >74 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes or bleeding within 1 year. The study was designed to demonstrate superiority of prasugrel 5 mg over clopidogrel 75 mg. RESULTS: Enrollment was interrupted, according to prespecified criteria, after a planned interim analysis, when 1443 patients (40% women; mean age, 80 years) had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 12 months, because of futility for efficacy. The primary end point occurred in 121 patients (17%) with prasugrel and 121 (16.6%) with clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.007; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.30; P=0.955). Definite/ probable stent thrombosis rates were 0.7% with prasugrel versus 1.9% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.00; P=0.06). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2 and greater rates were 4.1% with prasugrel versus 2.7% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.16; P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: The present study in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes showed no difference in the primary end point between reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel. However, the study should be interpreted in light of the premature termination of the trial.
KW - Acute coronary syndrome
KW - Aged
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Platelet aggregation inhibitors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051682828&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051682828&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032180
DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032180
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051682828
VL - 137
SP - 2435
EP - 2445
JO - Circulation
JF - Circulation
SN - 0009-7322
IS - 23
ER -