Comparison of the Prognostic Value of the Stress-Recovery Index Versus Standard Electrocardiographic Criteria in Patients With a Negative Exercise Electrocardiogram

Riccardo Bigi, Lauro Cortigiani, Dario Gregori, Cesare Fiorentini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To verify whether the stress recovery index (SRI) improves risk stratification in patients with a negative exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) using standard criteria, the SRI was derived in 708 consecutive patients with a negative exercise ECG. All-cause mortality and the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were target end points. The individual effect of clinical and exercise testing data on outcome was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with separate models for each group of variables. Model validation was performed using bootstrap adjusted by degree of optimism in estimates. Survival analysis was performed using a product-limit Kaplan-Meier method. During a 37-month follow-up, 22 deaths and 40 nonfatal acute coronary syndromes occurred. After adjusting for confounding variables, age (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 2.31 for interquartile difference), hypertension (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.89), and SRI (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86 for interquartile difference) were predictive of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Moreover, SRI increased the prognostic power of the model on top of clinical and exercise testing variables and provided significant discrimination of survival. In conclusion, the SRI may help refine the prognostic stratification of patients with a negative exercise test result using standard electrocardiographic criteria.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-609
Number of pages5
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume100
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 15 2007

Fingerprint

Electrocardiography
Exercise
Confidence Intervals
Myocardial Infarction
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Survival Analysis
Exercise Test
Regression Analysis
Hypertension
Survival
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of the Prognostic Value of the Stress-Recovery Index Versus Standard Electrocardiographic Criteria in Patients With a Negative Exercise Electrocardiogram. / Bigi, Riccardo; Cortigiani, Lauro; Gregori, Dario; Fiorentini, Cesare.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 100, No. 4, 15.08.2007, p. 605-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fa84844338b40fd854b58210c127c1a,
title = "Comparison of the Prognostic Value of the Stress-Recovery Index Versus Standard Electrocardiographic Criteria in Patients With a Negative Exercise Electrocardiogram",
abstract = "To verify whether the stress recovery index (SRI) improves risk stratification in patients with a negative exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) using standard criteria, the SRI was derived in 708 consecutive patients with a negative exercise ECG. All-cause mortality and the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were target end points. The individual effect of clinical and exercise testing data on outcome was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with separate models for each group of variables. Model validation was performed using bootstrap adjusted by degree of optimism in estimates. Survival analysis was performed using a product-limit Kaplan-Meier method. During a 37-month follow-up, 22 deaths and 40 nonfatal acute coronary syndromes occurred. After adjusting for confounding variables, age (hazard ratio 1.62, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 2.31 for interquartile difference), hypertension (hazard ratio 1.74, 95{\%} CI 1.04 to 2.89), and SRI (hazard ratio 0.75, 95{\%} CI 0.65 to 0.86 for interquartile difference) were predictive of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Moreover, SRI increased the prognostic power of the model on top of clinical and exercise testing variables and provided significant discrimination of survival. In conclusion, the SRI may help refine the prognostic stratification of patients with a negative exercise test result using standard electrocardiographic criteria.",
author = "Riccardo Bigi and Lauro Cortigiani and Dario Gregori and Cesare Fiorentini",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.068",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "605--609",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Prognostic Value of the Stress-Recovery Index Versus Standard Electrocardiographic Criteria in Patients With a Negative Exercise Electrocardiogram

AU - Bigi, Riccardo

AU - Cortigiani, Lauro

AU - Gregori, Dario

AU - Fiorentini, Cesare

PY - 2007/8/15

Y1 - 2007/8/15

N2 - To verify whether the stress recovery index (SRI) improves risk stratification in patients with a negative exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) using standard criteria, the SRI was derived in 708 consecutive patients with a negative exercise ECG. All-cause mortality and the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were target end points. The individual effect of clinical and exercise testing data on outcome was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with separate models for each group of variables. Model validation was performed using bootstrap adjusted by degree of optimism in estimates. Survival analysis was performed using a product-limit Kaplan-Meier method. During a 37-month follow-up, 22 deaths and 40 nonfatal acute coronary syndromes occurred. After adjusting for confounding variables, age (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 2.31 for interquartile difference), hypertension (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.89), and SRI (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86 for interquartile difference) were predictive of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Moreover, SRI increased the prognostic power of the model on top of clinical and exercise testing variables and provided significant discrimination of survival. In conclusion, the SRI may help refine the prognostic stratification of patients with a negative exercise test result using standard electrocardiographic criteria.

AB - To verify whether the stress recovery index (SRI) improves risk stratification in patients with a negative exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) using standard criteria, the SRI was derived in 708 consecutive patients with a negative exercise ECG. All-cause mortality and the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were target end points. The individual effect of clinical and exercise testing data on outcome was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with separate models for each group of variables. Model validation was performed using bootstrap adjusted by degree of optimism in estimates. Survival analysis was performed using a product-limit Kaplan-Meier method. During a 37-month follow-up, 22 deaths and 40 nonfatal acute coronary syndromes occurred. After adjusting for confounding variables, age (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 2.31 for interquartile difference), hypertension (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.89), and SRI (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86 for interquartile difference) were predictive of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Moreover, SRI increased the prognostic power of the model on top of clinical and exercise testing variables and provided significant discrimination of survival. In conclusion, the SRI may help refine the prognostic stratification of patients with a negative exercise test result using standard electrocardiographic criteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547670931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547670931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.068

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.068

M3 - Article

C2 - 17697814

AN - SCOPUS:34547670931

VL - 100

SP - 605

EP - 609

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 4

ER -