Comparison of the T-cell response to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) as detected by cytokine flow cytometry and QuantiFERON-CMV assay in HCMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients

Elisa Gabanti, Daniele Lilleri, Lucia Scaramuzzi, Paola Zelini, Teresa Rampino, Giuseppe Gerna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-cell response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) helps to identify patients at risk for severe infection. To assess the T-cell response, this study compared our in-house developed reference test, based on T-cell (both CD4+ and CD8+) stimulation by autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells (iDC) and subsequent detection by cytokine flow cytometry (CFC-iDC), with the Quanti-FERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay. Fifty-three HCMV-seropositive KTR were enrolled. At the DNAemia peak, 33 (62%) had low viral load (LVL, <3x105 DNA copies/mL) self-resolving infection, 19 (36%) high viral load (HVL, >3x105 DNA copies/mL) infection treated with antivirals, and one LVL patient (2%) tissue-invasive disease alone. Both assays showed a delayed recovery of HCMV-specific T-cell immunity in HVL vs LVL patients. Immune reconstitution kinetics did not significantly differ between the two assays in HVL patients. QF-CMV and CFC-iDC showed comparable sensitivities, but QF-CMV had a lower (although not significantly) specificity. Indeed, 7/19 HVL patients (37%) were erroneously considered protected from severe infection by QF-CMV, whereas CFC-iDC misidentified only 3/19 (16%) patients as protected. Although our reference test takes longer to complete, it appears slightly better at predicting patients at risk for severe HCMV infection. Moreover, QF-CMV May provide false negative results with some HLA types.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-202
Number of pages8
JournalNew Microbiologica
Volume41
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cytomegalovirus
Flow Cytometry
Cytokines
T-Lymphocytes
Kidney
Dendritic Cells
Infection
Cytomegalovirus Infections
Transplant Recipients
Viral Load
Antiviral Agents
Immunity
DNA

Keywords

  • Cytokine flow cytometry
  • Human cytomegalovirus
  • Kidney transplant recipients
  • QuantiFERON-CMV assay
  • T-cell response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

@article{801ed1ba5b7748c084e3ddd163acf8cc,
title = "Comparison of the T-cell response to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) as detected by cytokine flow cytometry and QuantiFERON-CMV assay in HCMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients",
abstract = "Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-cell response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) helps to identify patients at risk for severe infection. To assess the T-cell response, this study compared our in-house developed reference test, based on T-cell (both CD4+ and CD8+) stimulation by autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells (iDC) and subsequent detection by cytokine flow cytometry (CFC-iDC), with the Quanti-FERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay. Fifty-three HCMV-seropositive KTR were enrolled. At the DNAemia peak, 33 (62{\%}) had low viral load (LVL, <3x105 DNA copies/mL) self-resolving infection, 19 (36{\%}) high viral load (HVL, >3x105 DNA copies/mL) infection treated with antivirals, and one LVL patient (2{\%}) tissue-invasive disease alone. Both assays showed a delayed recovery of HCMV-specific T-cell immunity in HVL vs LVL patients. Immune reconstitution kinetics did not significantly differ between the two assays in HVL patients. QF-CMV and CFC-iDC showed comparable sensitivities, but QF-CMV had a lower (although not significantly) specificity. Indeed, 7/19 HVL patients (37{\%}) were erroneously considered protected from severe infection by QF-CMV, whereas CFC-iDC misidentified only 3/19 (16{\%}) patients as protected. Although our reference test takes longer to complete, it appears slightly better at predicting patients at risk for severe HCMV infection. Moreover, QF-CMV May provide false negative results with some HLA types.",
keywords = "Cytokine flow cytometry, Human cytomegalovirus, Kidney transplant recipients, QuantiFERON-CMV assay, T-cell response",
author = "Elisa Gabanti and Daniele Lilleri and Lucia Scaramuzzi and Paola Zelini and Teresa Rampino and Giuseppe Gerna",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "195--202",
journal = "New Microbiologica",
issn = "1121-7138",
publisher = "Luigi Ponzio e figlio Editori",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the T-cell response to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) as detected by cytokine flow cytometry and QuantiFERON-CMV assay in HCMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients

AU - Gabanti, Elisa

AU - Lilleri, Daniele

AU - Scaramuzzi, Lucia

AU - Zelini, Paola

AU - Rampino, Teresa

AU - Gerna, Giuseppe

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-cell response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) helps to identify patients at risk for severe infection. To assess the T-cell response, this study compared our in-house developed reference test, based on T-cell (both CD4+ and CD8+) stimulation by autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells (iDC) and subsequent detection by cytokine flow cytometry (CFC-iDC), with the Quanti-FERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay. Fifty-three HCMV-seropositive KTR were enrolled. At the DNAemia peak, 33 (62%) had low viral load (LVL, <3x105 DNA copies/mL) self-resolving infection, 19 (36%) high viral load (HVL, >3x105 DNA copies/mL) infection treated with antivirals, and one LVL patient (2%) tissue-invasive disease alone. Both assays showed a delayed recovery of HCMV-specific T-cell immunity in HVL vs LVL patients. Immune reconstitution kinetics did not significantly differ between the two assays in HVL patients. QF-CMV and CFC-iDC showed comparable sensitivities, but QF-CMV had a lower (although not significantly) specificity. Indeed, 7/19 HVL patients (37%) were erroneously considered protected from severe infection by QF-CMV, whereas CFC-iDC misidentified only 3/19 (16%) patients as protected. Although our reference test takes longer to complete, it appears slightly better at predicting patients at risk for severe HCMV infection. Moreover, QF-CMV May provide false negative results with some HLA types.

AB - Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-cell response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) helps to identify patients at risk for severe infection. To assess the T-cell response, this study compared our in-house developed reference test, based on T-cell (both CD4+ and CD8+) stimulation by autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells (iDC) and subsequent detection by cytokine flow cytometry (CFC-iDC), with the Quanti-FERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay. Fifty-three HCMV-seropositive KTR were enrolled. At the DNAemia peak, 33 (62%) had low viral load (LVL, <3x105 DNA copies/mL) self-resolving infection, 19 (36%) high viral load (HVL, >3x105 DNA copies/mL) infection treated with antivirals, and one LVL patient (2%) tissue-invasive disease alone. Both assays showed a delayed recovery of HCMV-specific T-cell immunity in HVL vs LVL patients. Immune reconstitution kinetics did not significantly differ between the two assays in HVL patients. QF-CMV and CFC-iDC showed comparable sensitivities, but QF-CMV had a lower (although not significantly) specificity. Indeed, 7/19 HVL patients (37%) were erroneously considered protected from severe infection by QF-CMV, whereas CFC-iDC misidentified only 3/19 (16%) patients as protected. Although our reference test takes longer to complete, it appears slightly better at predicting patients at risk for severe HCMV infection. Moreover, QF-CMV May provide false negative results with some HLA types.

KW - Cytokine flow cytometry

KW - Human cytomegalovirus

KW - Kidney transplant recipients

KW - QuantiFERON-CMV assay

KW - T-cell response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053278177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053278177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053278177

VL - 41

SP - 195

EP - 202

JO - New Microbiologica

JF - New Microbiologica

SN - 1121-7138

IS - 3

ER -