Comparison of times of intervention during pediatric CPR maneuvers using ABC and CAB sequences: A randomized trial

R. Lubrano; C. Cecchetti; E. Bellelli; I. Gentile; H. Loayza Levano; F. Orsini; G. Bertazzoni; G. Messi; S. Rugolotto; N. Pirozzi; M. Elli

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.011

Comparison of times of intervention during pediatric CPR maneuvers using ABC and CAB sequences: A randomized trial

R. Lubrano, C. Cecchetti, E. Bellelli, I. Gentile, H. Loayza Levano, F. Orsini, G. Bertazzoni, G. Messi, S. Rugolotto, N. Pirozzi, M. Elli

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: The proposed introduction of the CAB (circulation, airway, breathing) sequence for cardiopulmonary resuscitation has raised some perplexity within the pediatric community. We designed a randomized trial intended to verify if and how much timing of intervention in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation is affected by the use of the CAB vs. the ABC (airway, breathing, circulation) sequence. Patients and methods: 340 volunteers, paired into 170 two-person teams, performed 2-rescuer healthcare provider BLS with both a CAB and ABC sequence. Their performances were audio-video recorded and times of intervention in the two scenarios, cardiac and respiratory arrest, were monitored. Results: The CAB sequence compared to ABC prompts quicker recognition of respiratory (CAB vs. ABC. =17.48 ± 2.19 vs. 19.17 ± 2.38. s; p

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1473-1477
Number of pages	5
Journal	Resuscitation
Volume	83
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.011
Publication status	Published - Dec 2012

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Pediatric
Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Emergency
Emergency Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of times of intervention during pediatric CPR maneuvers using ABC and CAB sequences: A randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Comparison of times of intervention during pediatric CPR maneuvers using ABC and CAB sequences : A randomized trial. / Lubrano, R.; Cecchetti, C.; Bellelli, E.; Gentile, I.; Loayza Levano, H.; Orsini, F.; Bertazzoni, G.; Messi, G.; Rugolotto, S.; Pirozzi, N.; Elli, M.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 83, No. 12, 12.2012, p. 1473-1477.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{156c09af3b9c49bc8ba87881dfda4d96,

title = "Comparison of times of intervention during pediatric CPR maneuvers using ABC and CAB sequences: A randomized trial",

abstract = "Background: The proposed introduction of the CAB (circulation, airway, breathing) sequence for cardiopulmonary resuscitation has raised some perplexity within the pediatric community. We designed a randomized trial intended to verify if and how much timing of intervention in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation is affected by the use of the CAB vs. the ABC (airway, breathing, circulation) sequence. Patients and methods: 340 volunteers, paired into 170 two-person teams, performed 2-rescuer healthcare provider BLS with both a CAB and ABC sequence. Their performances were audio-video recorded and times of intervention in the two scenarios, cardiac and respiratory arrest, were monitored. Results: The CAB sequence compared to ABC prompts quicker recognition of respiratory (CAB vs. ABC. =17.48 ± 2.19 vs. 19.17 ± 2.38. s; p",

keywords = "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Pediatric, Quality improvement",

author = "R. Lubrano and C. Cecchetti and E. Bellelli and I. Gentile and {Loayza Levano}, H. and F. Orsini and G. Bertazzoni and G. Messi and S. Rugolotto and N. Pirozzi and M. Elli",

year = "2012",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.011",

language = "English",

volume = "83",

pages = "1473--1477",

journal = "Resuscitation",

issn = "0300-9572",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of times of intervention during pediatric CPR maneuvers using ABC and CAB sequences

T2 - A randomized trial

AU - Lubrano, R.

AU - Cecchetti, C.

AU - Bellelli, E.

AU - Gentile, I.

AU - Loayza Levano, H.

AU - Orsini, F.

AU - Bertazzoni, G.

AU - Messi, G.

AU - Rugolotto, S.

AU - Pirozzi, N.

AU - Elli, M.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Background: The proposed introduction of the CAB (circulation, airway, breathing) sequence for cardiopulmonary resuscitation has raised some perplexity within the pediatric community. We designed a randomized trial intended to verify if and how much timing of intervention in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation is affected by the use of the CAB vs. the ABC (airway, breathing, circulation) sequence. Patients and methods: 340 volunteers, paired into 170 two-person teams, performed 2-rescuer healthcare provider BLS with both a CAB and ABC sequence. Their performances were audio-video recorded and times of intervention in the two scenarios, cardiac and respiratory arrest, were monitored. Results: The CAB sequence compared to ABC prompts quicker recognition of respiratory (CAB vs. ABC. =17.48 ± 2.19 vs. 19.17 ± 2.38. s; p

AB - Background: The proposed introduction of the CAB (circulation, airway, breathing) sequence for cardiopulmonary resuscitation has raised some perplexity within the pediatric community. We designed a randomized trial intended to verify if and how much timing of intervention in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation is affected by the use of the CAB vs. the ABC (airway, breathing, circulation) sequence. Patients and methods: 340 volunteers, paired into 170 two-person teams, performed 2-rescuer healthcare provider BLS with both a CAB and ABC sequence. Their performances were audio-video recorded and times of intervention in the two scenarios, cardiac and respiratory arrest, were monitored. Results: The CAB sequence compared to ABC prompts quicker recognition of respiratory (CAB vs. ABC. =17.48 ± 2.19 vs. 19.17 ± 2.38. s; p

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Pediatric

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868208065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868208065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 22579678

AN - SCOPUS:84868208065

VL - 83

SP - 1473

EP - 1477

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 12

ER -