Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments

Does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?

F. Poropat, P. Heinz, E. Barbi, A. Ventura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Backround: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. Methods: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-15 years) was performed. Results: Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0-15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and "well child", more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases. Conclusions: ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalItalian Journal of Pediatrics
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 8 2017

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Primary Health Care
Emergencies
Organizations
Pediatrics
Age Groups
Italy
Age Distribution
England
General Practitioners
Communicable Diseases
Respiration
Fever
Retrospective Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Wounds and Injuries
Growth
Pediatricians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments : Does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance? / Poropat, F.; Heinz, P.; Barbi, E.; Ventura, A.

In: Italian Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 43, No. 1, 29, 08.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89e88f45bc4f4c95a18c88612150f4c0,
title = "Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: Does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?",
abstract = "Backround: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. Methods: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-15 years) was performed. Results: Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0-15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4{\%} vs 11.4{\%}). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and {"}well child{"}, more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1{\%} vs 4.8{\%}) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases. Conclusions: ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.",
author = "F. Poropat and P. Heinz and E. Barbi and A. Ventura",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
journal = "Italian Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "1720-8424",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments

T2 - Does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?

AU - Poropat, F.

AU - Heinz, P.

AU - Barbi, E.

AU - Ventura, A.

PY - 2017/3/8

Y1 - 2017/3/8

N2 - Backround: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. Methods: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-15 years) was performed. Results: Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0-15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and "well child", more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases. Conclusions: ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.

AB - Backround: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. Methods: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-15 years) was performed. Results: Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0-15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and "well child", more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases. Conclusions: ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014528387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014528387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y

DO - 10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y

M3 - Article

VL - 43

JO - Italian Journal of Pediatrics

JF - Italian Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 1720-8424

IS - 1

M1 - 29

ER -