Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses

Giuseppe Morgante, Antonio La Marca, Antonino Ditto, Vincenzo De Leo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the ability of two malignancy risk indices (RMI 1 and RMI 2) incorporating menopausal status, serum CA125 level and ultrasound findings, to discriminate a benign from a malignant pelvic mass. Design. A retrospective study. Setting. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Italy. Population. One hundred and twenty-four women over 30 years of age admitted consecutively between January 1995 and December 1997 for surgical excision of ovarian masses. Main outcome measures. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, separately and combined into the RMI I and RMI 2, to diagnose ovarian cancer. Results. The RMI 1 and RMI 2 were more accurate than menopausal status, ultrasound findings, and CA125 separately in diagnosing cancer. For all cut off values between 80 and 250, RMI 2 performed better than RMI 1. The RMI 2 at a cut off level of 125 gave a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 90%, and positive predictive value of 74%. Conclusions. We found that RMI 2 was more reliable in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian disease than RMI 1. RMI is a simple method which can be used in gynaecology clinics and less specialised centres.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)524-527
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume106
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Gynecology
Ovarian Diseases
Sensitivity and Specificity
Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department
Serum
Ovarian Neoplasms
Italy
Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. / Morgante, Giuseppe; La Marca, Antonio; Ditto, Antonino; De Leo, Vincenzo.

In: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 106, No. 6, 1999, p. 524-527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15686fbcbabe4dd289b5654dd0745776,
title = "Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses",
abstract = "Objective. To evaluate the ability of two malignancy risk indices (RMI 1 and RMI 2) incorporating menopausal status, serum CA125 level and ultrasound findings, to discriminate a benign from a malignant pelvic mass. Design. A retrospective study. Setting. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Italy. Population. One hundred and twenty-four women over 30 years of age admitted consecutively between January 1995 and December 1997 for surgical excision of ovarian masses. Main outcome measures. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, separately and combined into the RMI I and RMI 2, to diagnose ovarian cancer. Results. The RMI 1 and RMI 2 were more accurate than menopausal status, ultrasound findings, and CA125 separately in diagnosing cancer. For all cut off values between 80 and 250, RMI 2 performed better than RMI 1. The RMI 2 at a cut off level of 125 gave a sensitivity of 81{\%}, specificity of 90{\%}, and positive predictive value of 74{\%}. Conclusions. We found that RMI 2 was more reliable in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian disease than RMI 1. RMI is a simple method which can be used in gynaecology clinics and less specialised centres.",
author = "Giuseppe Morgante and {La Marca}, Antonio and Antonino Ditto and {De Leo}, Vincenzo",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "524--527",
journal = "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "0306-5456",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses

AU - Morgante, Giuseppe

AU - La Marca, Antonio

AU - Ditto, Antonino

AU - De Leo, Vincenzo

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Objective. To evaluate the ability of two malignancy risk indices (RMI 1 and RMI 2) incorporating menopausal status, serum CA125 level and ultrasound findings, to discriminate a benign from a malignant pelvic mass. Design. A retrospective study. Setting. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Italy. Population. One hundred and twenty-four women over 30 years of age admitted consecutively between January 1995 and December 1997 for surgical excision of ovarian masses. Main outcome measures. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, separately and combined into the RMI I and RMI 2, to diagnose ovarian cancer. Results. The RMI 1 and RMI 2 were more accurate than menopausal status, ultrasound findings, and CA125 separately in diagnosing cancer. For all cut off values between 80 and 250, RMI 2 performed better than RMI 1. The RMI 2 at a cut off level of 125 gave a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 90%, and positive predictive value of 74%. Conclusions. We found that RMI 2 was more reliable in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian disease than RMI 1. RMI is a simple method which can be used in gynaecology clinics and less specialised centres.

AB - Objective. To evaluate the ability of two malignancy risk indices (RMI 1 and RMI 2) incorporating menopausal status, serum CA125 level and ultrasound findings, to discriminate a benign from a malignant pelvic mass. Design. A retrospective study. Setting. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Italy. Population. One hundred and twenty-four women over 30 years of age admitted consecutively between January 1995 and December 1997 for surgical excision of ovarian masses. Main outcome measures. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, separately and combined into the RMI I and RMI 2, to diagnose ovarian cancer. Results. The RMI 1 and RMI 2 were more accurate than menopausal status, ultrasound findings, and CA125 separately in diagnosing cancer. For all cut off values between 80 and 250, RMI 2 performed better than RMI 1. The RMI 2 at a cut off level of 125 gave a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 90%, and positive predictive value of 74%. Conclusions. We found that RMI 2 was more reliable in discriminating benign and malignant ovarian disease than RMI 1. RMI is a simple method which can be used in gynaecology clinics and less specialised centres.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033056562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033056562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10426607

AN - SCOPUS:0033056562

VL - 106

SP - 524

EP - 527

JO - British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 0306-5456

IS - 6

ER -