Comparison of two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy: A randomized study

Gianluca Melegati, Davide Tornese, Marco Bandi, Manuela Rubini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To describe and compare two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Design: Forty-one subjects selected through clinical examination were randomly assigned to two groups of treatment. Interventions: Each subject received a three-session ultrasound-guided ESWT (performed weekly). Lateral tangential focusing was used in group A, whereas back tangential focusing was used for group B. Main outcome measures: Total Elbow Scoring System (TESS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate each subject before the treatment and at six months follow-up. Results: TESS and VAS pretreatment scores were homogeneous between the groups (p > 0.05). In both groups there was a significant (p <0.05) increase in the TESS score and a decrease in the VAS score but there was no resolution of the pain. TESS and VAS follow-up scores were homogeneous between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: There was no difference between the two techniques of using ESWT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-370
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Tennis Elbow
Convulsive Therapy
Elbow
Visual Analog Scale
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Comparison of two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy : A randomized study. / Melegati, Gianluca; Tornese, Davide; Bandi, Marco; Rubini, Manuela.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 4, 06.2004, p. 366-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85360a77548041788939c44a6e617496,
title = "Comparison of two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy: A randomized study",
abstract = "Objective: To describe and compare two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Design: Forty-one subjects selected through clinical examination were randomly assigned to two groups of treatment. Interventions: Each subject received a three-session ultrasound-guided ESWT (performed weekly). Lateral tangential focusing was used in group A, whereas back tangential focusing was used for group B. Main outcome measures: Total Elbow Scoring System (TESS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate each subject before the treatment and at six months follow-up. Results: TESS and VAS pretreatment scores were homogeneous between the groups (p > 0.05). In both groups there was a significant (p <0.05) increase in the TESS score and a decrease in the VAS score but there was no resolution of the pain. TESS and VAS follow-up scores were homogeneous between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: There was no difference between the two techniques of using ESWT.",
author = "Gianluca Melegati and Davide Tornese and Marco Bandi and Manuela Rubini",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1191/0269215504cr762oa",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "366--370",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy

T2 - A randomized study

AU - Melegati, Gianluca

AU - Tornese, Davide

AU - Bandi, Marco

AU - Rubini, Manuela

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Objective: To describe and compare two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Design: Forty-one subjects selected through clinical examination were randomly assigned to two groups of treatment. Interventions: Each subject received a three-session ultrasound-guided ESWT (performed weekly). Lateral tangential focusing was used in group A, whereas back tangential focusing was used for group B. Main outcome measures: Total Elbow Scoring System (TESS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate each subject before the treatment and at six months follow-up. Results: TESS and VAS pretreatment scores were homogeneous between the groups (p > 0.05). In both groups there was a significant (p <0.05) increase in the TESS score and a decrease in the VAS score but there was no resolution of the pain. TESS and VAS follow-up scores were homogeneous between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: There was no difference between the two techniques of using ESWT.

AB - Objective: To describe and compare two ultrasonographic localization techniques for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Design: Forty-one subjects selected through clinical examination were randomly assigned to two groups of treatment. Interventions: Each subject received a three-session ultrasound-guided ESWT (performed weekly). Lateral tangential focusing was used in group A, whereas back tangential focusing was used for group B. Main outcome measures: Total Elbow Scoring System (TESS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate each subject before the treatment and at six months follow-up. Results: TESS and VAS pretreatment scores were homogeneous between the groups (p > 0.05). In both groups there was a significant (p <0.05) increase in the TESS score and a decrease in the VAS score but there was no resolution of the pain. TESS and VAS follow-up scores were homogeneous between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: There was no difference between the two techniques of using ESWT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542577761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542577761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/0269215504cr762oa

DO - 10.1191/0269215504cr762oa

M3 - Article

C2 - 15180119

AN - SCOPUS:2542577761

VL - 18

SP - 366

EP - 370

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 4

ER -