Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions: A survey of 185 randomized trials

Sivia Gianola, Pamela Frigerio, Michela Agostini, Rosa Bolotta, Greta Castellini, Davide Corbetta, Monica Gasparini, Paolo Gozzer, Erica Guariento, Linda C. Li, Valentina Pecoraro, V. Sirtori, Andrea Turolla, Anita Andreano, Pasquale Lorenzo Moja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To assess reporting completeness of the most frequent outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation interventions for mechanical low back pain. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of RCTs included in all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) published up to May 2013. Two authors independently evaluated the type and frequency of each outcome measure reported, the methods used to measure outcomes, the completeness of outcome reporting using a eight-item checklist, and the proportion of outcomes fully replicable by an independent assessor. Results: Our literature search identified 11 SRs, including 185 RCTs. Thirty-six different outcomes were investigated across all RCTs. The 2 most commonly reported outcomes were pain (n = 165 RCTs; 89.2%) and disability (n = 118 RCTs; 63.8%), which were assessed by 66 and 44 measurement tools, respectively. Pain and disability outcomes were found replicable in only 10.3% (n = 17) and 10.2% (n = 12) of the RCTs, respectively. Only 40 RCTs (21.6%) distinguished between primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusions: A large number of outcome measures and a myriad of measurement instruments were used across all RCTs. The reporting was largely incomplete, suggesting an opportunity for a standardized approach to reporting in rehabilitation science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pain
Checklist
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • As topic
  • Data reporting
  • Low back pain
  • Outcome measures
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Rehabilitation
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions : A survey of 185 randomized trials. / Gianola, Sivia; Frigerio, Pamela; Agostini, Michela; Bolotta, Rosa; Castellini, Greta; Corbetta, Davide; Gasparini, Monica; Gozzer, Paolo; Guariento, Erica; Li, Linda C.; Pecoraro, Valentina; Sirtori, V.; Turolla, Andrea; Andreano, Anita; Moja, Pasquale Lorenzo.

In: Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 267-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gianola, S, Frigerio, P, Agostini, M, Bolotta, R, Castellini, G, Corbetta, D, Gasparini, M, Gozzer, P, Guariento, E, Li, LC, Pecoraro, V, Sirtori, V, Turolla, A, Andreano, A & Moja, PL 2016, 'Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions: A survey of 185 randomized trials', Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 267-274. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2015-30
Gianola, Sivia ; Frigerio, Pamela ; Agostini, Michela ; Bolotta, Rosa ; Castellini, Greta ; Corbetta, Davide ; Gasparini, Monica ; Gozzer, Paolo ; Guariento, Erica ; Li, Linda C. ; Pecoraro, Valentina ; Sirtori, V. ; Turolla, Andrea ; Andreano, Anita ; Moja, Pasquale Lorenzo. / Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions : A survey of 185 randomized trials. In: Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada. 2016 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 267-274.
@article{aacb1a6bfbfb4f82a969e2fcce3f63c4,
title = "Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions: A survey of 185 randomized trials",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess reporting completeness of the most frequent outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation interventions for mechanical low back pain. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of RCTs included in all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) published up to May 2013. Two authors independently evaluated the type and frequency of each outcome measure reported, the methods used to measure outcomes, the completeness of outcome reporting using a eight-item checklist, and the proportion of outcomes fully replicable by an independent assessor. Results: Our literature search identified 11 SRs, including 185 RCTs. Thirty-six different outcomes were investigated across all RCTs. The 2 most commonly reported outcomes were pain (n = 165 RCTs; 89.2{\%}) and disability (n = 118 RCTs; 63.8{\%}), which were assessed by 66 and 44 measurement tools, respectively. Pain and disability outcomes were found replicable in only 10.3{\%} (n = 17) and 10.2{\%} (n = 12) of the RCTs, respectively. Only 40 RCTs (21.6{\%}) distinguished between primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusions: A large number of outcome measures and a myriad of measurement instruments were used across all RCTs. The reporting was largely incomplete, suggesting an opportunity for a standardized approach to reporting in rehabilitation science.",
keywords = "As topic, Data reporting, Low back pain, Outcome measures, Randomized controlled trials, Rehabilitation, Survey",
author = "Sivia Gianola and Pamela Frigerio and Michela Agostini and Rosa Bolotta and Greta Castellini and Davide Corbetta and Monica Gasparini and Paolo Gozzer and Erica Guariento and Li, {Linda C.} and Valentina Pecoraro and V. Sirtori and Andrea Turolla and Anita Andreano and Moja, {Pasquale Lorenzo}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3138/ptc.2015-30",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "267--274",
journal = "Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada",
issn = "0300-0508",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Completeness of outcomes description reported in low back pain rehabilitation interventions

T2 - A survey of 185 randomized trials

AU - Gianola, Sivia

AU - Frigerio, Pamela

AU - Agostini, Michela

AU - Bolotta, Rosa

AU - Castellini, Greta

AU - Corbetta, Davide

AU - Gasparini, Monica

AU - Gozzer, Paolo

AU - Guariento, Erica

AU - Li, Linda C.

AU - Pecoraro, Valentina

AU - Sirtori, V.

AU - Turolla, Andrea

AU - Andreano, Anita

AU - Moja, Pasquale Lorenzo

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess reporting completeness of the most frequent outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation interventions for mechanical low back pain. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of RCTs included in all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) published up to May 2013. Two authors independently evaluated the type and frequency of each outcome measure reported, the methods used to measure outcomes, the completeness of outcome reporting using a eight-item checklist, and the proportion of outcomes fully replicable by an independent assessor. Results: Our literature search identified 11 SRs, including 185 RCTs. Thirty-six different outcomes were investigated across all RCTs. The 2 most commonly reported outcomes were pain (n = 165 RCTs; 89.2%) and disability (n = 118 RCTs; 63.8%), which were assessed by 66 and 44 measurement tools, respectively. Pain and disability outcomes were found replicable in only 10.3% (n = 17) and 10.2% (n = 12) of the RCTs, respectively. Only 40 RCTs (21.6%) distinguished between primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusions: A large number of outcome measures and a myriad of measurement instruments were used across all RCTs. The reporting was largely incomplete, suggesting an opportunity for a standardized approach to reporting in rehabilitation science.

AB - Purpose: To assess reporting completeness of the most frequent outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation interventions for mechanical low back pain. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of RCTs included in all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) published up to May 2013. Two authors independently evaluated the type and frequency of each outcome measure reported, the methods used to measure outcomes, the completeness of outcome reporting using a eight-item checklist, and the proportion of outcomes fully replicable by an independent assessor. Results: Our literature search identified 11 SRs, including 185 RCTs. Thirty-six different outcomes were investigated across all RCTs. The 2 most commonly reported outcomes were pain (n = 165 RCTs; 89.2%) and disability (n = 118 RCTs; 63.8%), which were assessed by 66 and 44 measurement tools, respectively. Pain and disability outcomes were found replicable in only 10.3% (n = 17) and 10.2% (n = 12) of the RCTs, respectively. Only 40 RCTs (21.6%) distinguished between primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusions: A large number of outcome measures and a myriad of measurement instruments were used across all RCTs. The reporting was largely incomplete, suggesting an opportunity for a standardized approach to reporting in rehabilitation science.

KW - As topic

KW - Data reporting

KW - Low back pain

KW - Outcome measures

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988736433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988736433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3138/ptc.2015-30

DO - 10.3138/ptc.2015-30

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 267

EP - 274

JO - Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada

JF - Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada

SN - 0300-0508

IS - 3

ER -