Complexity of visual stimuli and non-linear EEG dynamics in humans

Viktor Müller, Werner Lutzenberger, Hubert Preißl, Friedemann Pulvermüller, Niels Birbaumer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The effects of stimulus complexity on the nonlinear electrical brain (EEG) dynamics were investigated in a sample of 24 healthy volunteers. Stimuli used were either a single mechanical low-friction pendulum with a periodic movement (temporal frequency about 1 Hz) or a double-pendulum with a chaotic movement, which were observed for 2-3 min in each case. The prediction that a more complex visual stimulus (double-pendulum) increases the dimensional complexity of brain activity as compared to a simple visual stimulus (single-pendulum), was confirmed by determination of pointwise correlation dimension. Further, there was a significant decrease of alpha power in the double-pendulum compared to a single-pendulum condition. Moreover, a correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between EEG complexity and beta power over the whole cortex in the single- and, above all, in the double-pendulum condition, and also a positive correlation between dimensional complexity and alpha power in the double-pendulum condition only, particularly in the brain regions responsible for the 'bottom-up' sustained attention processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-110
Number of pages7
JournalCognitive Brain Research
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003

Keywords

  • Cell assembly
  • Dimensional complexity
  • Perception
  • Spectral power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Complexity of visual stimuli and non-linear EEG dynamics in humans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Müller, V., Lutzenberger, W., Preißl, H., Pulvermüller, F., & Birbaumer, N. (2003). Complexity of visual stimuli and non-linear EEG dynamics in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(1), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00225-2