Contemporary management of the painful bladder: A systematic review

Antonella Giannantoni, Vittorio Bini, Roger Dmochowski, Philip Hanno, J. Curtis Nickel, Silvia Proietti, Jean Jacques Wyndaele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Different types of behavioural, dietary, interventional, pharmacologic, and surgical therapies have been used to treat painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis (PBS/IC). Because of the paucity of randomised placebo-controlled studies on different treatments, an evidence-based management approach has not yet been developed. Objective: To critically review and synthesize data from a wide range of current therapeutic approaches to PBS/IC, to quantify the effect size from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and to reach clinical agreement on the efficacy of treatments for PBS/IC. Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify articles published between 1990 and September 2010 on the management of PBS/IC. We included articles restricted to the English language published since 1990 to date that reported on oral and intravesical treatment, multimodal or combined treatment, and surgical treatment. For all RCTs, standardised mean differences (SMDs) were extracted and combined in a meta-analysis applying a random-effect model that incorporated the heterogeneity of effects. The four outcomes assessed in all studies were a change in the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI), pain, urgency, and frequency. Non-RCTs (nRCTs) were analysed with a narrative synthesis of the evidence from all research designs. Evidence synthesis: We included 7709 adult patients from 29 RCTs and 57 nRCTs. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed that only cyclosporine A provided a simultaneous great effect size of SMD on ICSI, pain, and frequency. Amitriptyline at different dosages showed a great effect size of SMD on pain and urgency or on ICSI and frequency. The remaining RCTs showed sporadic significant changes in only one of the four considered parameters. The attributed levels of evidence for treatments reported in RCTs were 1b; grades of recommendations ranged from A to C. According to the Jadad score, 11 RCTs were high-quality studies. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed a great heterogeneity in the applied methodologies, clinical outcomes assessed, and the obtained results in different studies. The results from the nRCTs showed that the most frequently adopted treatment is oral pentosan polysulfate and that the use of botulinum A toxin intradetrusorial injections in PBS/IC is increasing. A high heterogeneity in drugs and treatment modalities, clinical outcomes, and obtained results was also found for nRCTs. Conclusions: Limited evidence exists for the few treatments for PBS/IC. The lack of definitive conclusions is due to the great heterogeneity in methodology, symptoms assessment, duration of treatment, and follow-up in both RCTs and nRCTs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-53
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Bladder pain
  • Interstitial cystitis
  • Intravesical treatment
  • Oral treatment
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary management of the painful bladder: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Giannantoni, A., Bini, V., Dmochowski, R., Hanno, P., Nickel, J. C., Proietti, S., & Wyndaele, J. J. (2012). Contemporary management of the painful bladder: A systematic review. European Urology, 61(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.069