Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: A European perspective

Corrado Tamburino, Azeem Latib, Robert Jan Van Geuns, Manel Sabate, Julinda Mehilli, Tommaso Gori, Stephan Achenbach, Manuel Pan Alvarez, Holger Nef, Maciej Lesiak, Carlo Di Mario, Antonio Colombo, Christoph K. Naber, Giuseppe Caramanno, Piera Capranzano, Salvatore Brugaletta, Salvatore Geraci, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Alessio Mattesini, Stylianos A. PyxarasLukasz Rzeszutko, Rafalo Depukat, Roberto Diletti, Els Boone, Davide Capodanno, Dariusz Dudek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: Next to patient characteristics, the lack of a standardised approach for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is perceived as a potential explanation for the heterogeneous results reported so far. To provide some guidance, we sought to find a consensus on the best practices for BVS implantation and management across a broad array of patient and lesion scenarios. Methods and results: Fourteen European centres with a high volume of BVS procedures combined their efforts in an informal collaboration. To get the most objective snapshot of different practices among the participating centres, a survey with 45 multiple choice questions was prepared and conducted. The results of the survey represented a basis for the technical advice provided in the document, whereas areas of controversy are highlighted. Conclusions: Consensus criteria for patient and lesion selection, BVS implantation and optimisation, use of intravascular imaging guidance, approach to multiple patient and lesion scenarios, and management of complications, were identified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-52
Number of pages8
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Practice Guidelines
Patient Selection
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Bioresorbable vascular scaffold
  • Consensus document

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Tamburino, C., Latib, A., Van Geuns, R. J., Sabate, M., Mehilli, J., Gori, T., ... Dudek, D. (2015). Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: A European perspective. EuroIntervention, 11(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M01-05

Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds : A European perspective. / Tamburino, Corrado; Latib, Azeem; Van Geuns, Robert Jan; Sabate, Manel; Mehilli, Julinda; Gori, Tommaso; Achenbach, Stephan; Alvarez, Manuel Pan; Nef, Holger; Lesiak, Maciej; Di Mario, Carlo; Colombo, Antonio; Naber, Christoph K.; Caramanno, Giuseppe; Capranzano, Piera; Brugaletta, Salvatore; Geraci, Salvatore; Araszkiewicz, Aleksander; Mattesini, Alessio; Pyxaras, Stylianos A.; Rzeszutko, Lukasz; Depukat, Rafalo; Diletti, Roberto; Boone, Els; Capodanno, Davide; Dudek, Dariusz.

In: EuroIntervention, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.05.2015, p. 45-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tamburino, C, Latib, A, Van Geuns, RJ, Sabate, M, Mehilli, J, Gori, T, Achenbach, S, Alvarez, MP, Nef, H, Lesiak, M, Di Mario, C, Colombo, A, Naber, CK, Caramanno, G, Capranzano, P, Brugaletta, S, Geraci, S, Araszkiewicz, A, Mattesini, A, Pyxaras, SA, Rzeszutko, L, Depukat, R, Diletti, R, Boone, E, Capodanno, D & Dudek, D 2015, 'Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: A European perspective', EuroIntervention, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45-52. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M01-05
Tamburino, Corrado ; Latib, Azeem ; Van Geuns, Robert Jan ; Sabate, Manel ; Mehilli, Julinda ; Gori, Tommaso ; Achenbach, Stephan ; Alvarez, Manuel Pan ; Nef, Holger ; Lesiak, Maciej ; Di Mario, Carlo ; Colombo, Antonio ; Naber, Christoph K. ; Caramanno, Giuseppe ; Capranzano, Piera ; Brugaletta, Salvatore ; Geraci, Salvatore ; Araszkiewicz, Aleksander ; Mattesini, Alessio ; Pyxaras, Stylianos A. ; Rzeszutko, Lukasz ; Depukat, Rafalo ; Diletti, Roberto ; Boone, Els ; Capodanno, Davide ; Dudek, Dariusz. / Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds : A European perspective. In: EuroIntervention. 2015 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 45-52.
@article{ac67e602d38e4047a125dc47c4b9fd28,
title = "Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: A European perspective",
abstract = "Aims: Next to patient characteristics, the lack of a standardised approach for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is perceived as a potential explanation for the heterogeneous results reported so far. To provide some guidance, we sought to find a consensus on the best practices for BVS implantation and management across a broad array of patient and lesion scenarios. Methods and results: Fourteen European centres with a high volume of BVS procedures combined their efforts in an informal collaboration. To get the most objective snapshot of different practices among the participating centres, a survey with 45 multiple choice questions was prepared and conducted. The results of the survey represented a basis for the technical advice provided in the document, whereas areas of controversy are highlighted. Conclusions: Consensus criteria for patient and lesion selection, BVS implantation and optimisation, use of intravascular imaging guidance, approach to multiple patient and lesion scenarios, and management of complications, were identified.",
keywords = "Bioresorbable vascular scaffold, Consensus document",
author = "Corrado Tamburino and Azeem Latib and {Van Geuns}, {Robert Jan} and Manel Sabate and Julinda Mehilli and Tommaso Gori and Stephan Achenbach and Alvarez, {Manuel Pan} and Holger Nef and Maciej Lesiak and {Di Mario}, Carlo and Antonio Colombo and Naber, {Christoph K.} and Giuseppe Caramanno and Piera Capranzano and Salvatore Brugaletta and Salvatore Geraci and Aleksander Araszkiewicz and Alessio Mattesini and Pyxaras, {Stylianos A.} and Lukasz Rzeszutko and Rafalo Depukat and Roberto Diletti and Els Boone and Davide Capodanno and Dariusz Dudek",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4244/EIJY15M01-05",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "45--52",
journal = "EuroIntervention",
issn = "1774-024X",
publisher = "EuroPCR",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds

T2 - A European perspective

AU - Tamburino, Corrado

AU - Latib, Azeem

AU - Van Geuns, Robert Jan

AU - Sabate, Manel

AU - Mehilli, Julinda

AU - Gori, Tommaso

AU - Achenbach, Stephan

AU - Alvarez, Manuel Pan

AU - Nef, Holger

AU - Lesiak, Maciej

AU - Di Mario, Carlo

AU - Colombo, Antonio

AU - Naber, Christoph K.

AU - Caramanno, Giuseppe

AU - Capranzano, Piera

AU - Brugaletta, Salvatore

AU - Geraci, Salvatore

AU - Araszkiewicz, Aleksander

AU - Mattesini, Alessio

AU - Pyxaras, Stylianos A.

AU - Rzeszutko, Lukasz

AU - Depukat, Rafalo

AU - Diletti, Roberto

AU - Boone, Els

AU - Capodanno, Davide

AU - Dudek, Dariusz

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Aims: Next to patient characteristics, the lack of a standardised approach for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is perceived as a potential explanation for the heterogeneous results reported so far. To provide some guidance, we sought to find a consensus on the best practices for BVS implantation and management across a broad array of patient and lesion scenarios. Methods and results: Fourteen European centres with a high volume of BVS procedures combined their efforts in an informal collaboration. To get the most objective snapshot of different practices among the participating centres, a survey with 45 multiple choice questions was prepared and conducted. The results of the survey represented a basis for the technical advice provided in the document, whereas areas of controversy are highlighted. Conclusions: Consensus criteria for patient and lesion selection, BVS implantation and optimisation, use of intravascular imaging guidance, approach to multiple patient and lesion scenarios, and management of complications, were identified.

AB - Aims: Next to patient characteristics, the lack of a standardised approach for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is perceived as a potential explanation for the heterogeneous results reported so far. To provide some guidance, we sought to find a consensus on the best practices for BVS implantation and management across a broad array of patient and lesion scenarios. Methods and results: Fourteen European centres with a high volume of BVS procedures combined their efforts in an informal collaboration. To get the most objective snapshot of different practices among the participating centres, a survey with 45 multiple choice questions was prepared and conducted. The results of the survey represented a basis for the technical advice provided in the document, whereas areas of controversy are highlighted. Conclusions: Consensus criteria for patient and lesion selection, BVS implantation and optimisation, use of intravascular imaging guidance, approach to multiple patient and lesion scenarios, and management of complications, were identified.

KW - Bioresorbable vascular scaffold

KW - Consensus document

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929804338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929804338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4244/EIJY15M01-05

DO - 10.4244/EIJY15M01-05

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 45

EP - 52

JO - EuroIntervention

JF - EuroIntervention

SN - 1774-024X

IS - 1

ER -