Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli

Vanessa Era, Matteo Candidi, Salvatore Maria Aglioti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the increasing interest in the plasticity of aesthetic appreciation, we know comparatively little about the role of individuals' cultural (e.g. the appreciators' expertise) and of social emotional-cognitive (e.g. the social influence of people perceived as warm or competent) variables in modulating the appreciation process. In two experiments we investigated 1) whether people with different art-expertise are influenced differently by contextual (i.e. stimuli primed as art) and social (i.e. stimuli rated as beautiful by art-critics) information and 2) whether acknowledging the judgment of a person perceived as warm or as competent has a different influence on individuals' aesthetic appreciation of art works. Warmth and competence are two social dimensions of fundamental importance for categorizing others as in-group or out-group (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002). We found that insinuating that the observed works were pieces of art, highly appreciated by art critics, lead expert participants to judge the stimuli as more beautiful in comparison to when the very same stimuli were not preceded by any manipulation. Moreover, we found that both art-experts and non-experts rated the stimuli as more beautiful when they believed it to be highly appreciated by people perceived as warm vs people perceived as competent. These results provide novel information on the plasticity of aesthetics and pave the way to understanding how tastes and preferences in the domain of aesthetics can be influenced.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102881
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Art
Esthetics
Contextual
Aesthetic Appreciation
Abstract Art
Stimulus
Mental Competency
Aesthetics
Expertise
Art Critic
Plasticity

Keywords

  • Aesthetic appreciation
  • Body
  • Expertise
  • Stereotype content model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli. / Era, Vanessa; Candidi, Matteo; Aglioti, Salvatore Maria.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 199, 102881, 01.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d7387b3b73f477abbd1fd0d9641942c,
title = "Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli",
abstract = "Despite the increasing interest in the plasticity of aesthetic appreciation, we know comparatively little about the role of individuals' cultural (e.g. the appreciators' expertise) and of social emotional-cognitive (e.g. the social influence of people perceived as warm or competent) variables in modulating the appreciation process. In two experiments we investigated 1) whether people with different art-expertise are influenced differently by contextual (i.e. stimuli primed as art) and social (i.e. stimuli rated as beautiful by art-critics) information and 2) whether acknowledging the judgment of a person perceived as warm or as competent has a different influence on individuals' aesthetic appreciation of art works. Warmth and competence are two social dimensions of fundamental importance for categorizing others as in-group or out-group (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002). We found that insinuating that the observed works were pieces of art, highly appreciated by art critics, lead expert participants to judge the stimuli as more beautiful in comparison to when the very same stimuli were not preceded by any manipulation. Moreover, we found that both art-experts and non-experts rated the stimuli as more beautiful when they believed it to be highly appreciated by people perceived as warm vs people perceived as competent. These results provide novel information on the plasticity of aesthetics and pave the way to understanding how tastes and preferences in the domain of aesthetics can be influenced.",
keywords = "Aesthetic appreciation, Body, Expertise, Stereotype content model",
author = "Vanessa Era and Matteo Candidi and Aglioti, {Salvatore Maria}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102881",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli

AU - Era, Vanessa

AU - Candidi, Matteo

AU - Aglioti, Salvatore Maria

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Despite the increasing interest in the plasticity of aesthetic appreciation, we know comparatively little about the role of individuals' cultural (e.g. the appreciators' expertise) and of social emotional-cognitive (e.g. the social influence of people perceived as warm or competent) variables in modulating the appreciation process. In two experiments we investigated 1) whether people with different art-expertise are influenced differently by contextual (i.e. stimuli primed as art) and social (i.e. stimuli rated as beautiful by art-critics) information and 2) whether acknowledging the judgment of a person perceived as warm or as competent has a different influence on individuals' aesthetic appreciation of art works. Warmth and competence are two social dimensions of fundamental importance for categorizing others as in-group or out-group (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002). We found that insinuating that the observed works were pieces of art, highly appreciated by art critics, lead expert participants to judge the stimuli as more beautiful in comparison to when the very same stimuli were not preceded by any manipulation. Moreover, we found that both art-experts and non-experts rated the stimuli as more beautiful when they believed it to be highly appreciated by people perceived as warm vs people perceived as competent. These results provide novel information on the plasticity of aesthetics and pave the way to understanding how tastes and preferences in the domain of aesthetics can be influenced.

AB - Despite the increasing interest in the plasticity of aesthetic appreciation, we know comparatively little about the role of individuals' cultural (e.g. the appreciators' expertise) and of social emotional-cognitive (e.g. the social influence of people perceived as warm or competent) variables in modulating the appreciation process. In two experiments we investigated 1) whether people with different art-expertise are influenced differently by contextual (i.e. stimuli primed as art) and social (i.e. stimuli rated as beautiful by art-critics) information and 2) whether acknowledging the judgment of a person perceived as warm or as competent has a different influence on individuals' aesthetic appreciation of art works. Warmth and competence are two social dimensions of fundamental importance for categorizing others as in-group or out-group (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002). We found that insinuating that the observed works were pieces of art, highly appreciated by art critics, lead expert participants to judge the stimuli as more beautiful in comparison to when the very same stimuli were not preceded by any manipulation. Moreover, we found that both art-experts and non-experts rated the stimuli as more beautiful when they believed it to be highly appreciated by people perceived as warm vs people perceived as competent. These results provide novel information on the plasticity of aesthetics and pave the way to understanding how tastes and preferences in the domain of aesthetics can be influenced.

KW - Aesthetic appreciation

KW - Body

KW - Expertise

KW - Stereotype content model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069639133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069639133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102881

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102881

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069639133

VL - 199

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

M1 - 102881

ER -