Continuous positive airway pressure treatment with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term effectiveness and adherence

Andrea Lanza, Sara Mariani, Maurizio Sommariva, Chiara Campana, Annalisa Rubino, Michele Nichelatti, Paola Proserpio, Lino Nobili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Backgrounds: Mask-related side effects can negatively influence adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Nasal pillows (P) can be an alternative to the standard nasal masks (N), although there are no data about their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and adherence to CPAP therapy delivered with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients. Methods: A retrospective observational design involving a series of consecutive CPAP-naïve patients affected by OSAS. After an initial mask fitting session all patients were allowed to choose the type of nasal interface (N or P) they preferred. Outcomes were assessed 5 days after CPAP titration, and after 2 and 12 months. Patients were offered the option of switching to an alternative mask if needed. Results: Data from 144 patients were analyzed. Subjects were predominantly male (76%), middle aged (58.14 ± 12.86), moderately obese (body mass index: 33.89 ± 7.56), and affected by severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index: 47.60 ± 21.31). A total of 102 patients (70.8%) chose P, and 42 (29.2%) chose N. Clinical and polygraphic features, and CPAP pressure levels were similar in P and N groups, both at baseline and at 12 months. A good adherence to treatment was observed in both groups (P, 5.5 ± 1.8 h; N, 5.3 ± 1.5 h). Seventy-six patients (53%) reported at least one side effect during the whole study period, without statistically significant between-group differences. Nostril pain was the most frequent side effect in P. Conclusions: Nasal pillows showed equal long-term effectiveness and objective adherence as standard nasal masks.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSleep Medicine
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Nose
Masks
Therapeutics
Apnea
Body Mass Index
Pressure
Pain

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Continuous positive airway pressure
  • Interface
  • Mask
  • Nasal pillows
  • Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Continuous positive airway pressure treatment with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea : Long-term effectiveness and adherence. / Lanza, Andrea; Mariani, Sara; Sommariva, Maurizio; Campana, Chiara; Rubino, Annalisa; Nichelatti, Michele; Proserpio, Paola; Nobili, Lino.

In: Sleep Medicine, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lanza, Andrea ; Mariani, Sara ; Sommariva, Maurizio ; Campana, Chiara ; Rubino, Annalisa ; Nichelatti, Michele ; Proserpio, Paola ; Nobili, Lino. / Continuous positive airway pressure treatment with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea : Long-term effectiveness and adherence. In: Sleep Medicine. 2017.
@article{7e7061498f79471cbab1197d1fb0091d,
title = "Continuous positive airway pressure treatment with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea: Long-term effectiveness and adherence",
abstract = "Backgrounds: Mask-related side effects can negatively influence adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Nasal pillows (P) can be an alternative to the standard nasal masks (N), although there are no data about their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and adherence to CPAP therapy delivered with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients. Methods: A retrospective observational design involving a series of consecutive CPAP-na{\"i}ve patients affected by OSAS. After an initial mask fitting session all patients were allowed to choose the type of nasal interface (N or P) they preferred. Outcomes were assessed 5 days after CPAP titration, and after 2 and 12 months. Patients were offered the option of switching to an alternative mask if needed. Results: Data from 144 patients were analyzed. Subjects were predominantly male (76{\%}), middle aged (58.14 ± 12.86), moderately obese (body mass index: 33.89 ± 7.56), and affected by severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index: 47.60 ± 21.31). A total of 102 patients (70.8{\%}) chose P, and 42 (29.2{\%}) chose N. Clinical and polygraphic features, and CPAP pressure levels were similar in P and N groups, both at baseline and at 12 months. A good adherence to treatment was observed in both groups (P, 5.5 ± 1.8 h; N, 5.3 ± 1.5 h). Seventy-six patients (53{\%}) reported at least one side effect during the whole study period, without statistically significant between-group differences. Nostril pain was the most frequent side effect in P. Conclusions: Nasal pillows showed equal long-term effectiveness and objective adherence as standard nasal masks.",
keywords = "Adherence, Continuous positive airway pressure, Interface, Mask, Nasal pillows, Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome",
author = "Andrea Lanza and Sara Mariani and Maurizio Sommariva and Chiara Campana and Annalisa Rubino and Michele Nichelatti and Paola Proserpio and Lino Nobili",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.sleep.2017.08.024",
language = "English",
journal = "Sleep Medicine",
issn = "1389-9457",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous positive airway pressure treatment with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea

T2 - Long-term effectiveness and adherence

AU - Lanza, Andrea

AU - Mariani, Sara

AU - Sommariva, Maurizio

AU - Campana, Chiara

AU - Rubino, Annalisa

AU - Nichelatti, Michele

AU - Proserpio, Paola

AU - Nobili, Lino

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Backgrounds: Mask-related side effects can negatively influence adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Nasal pillows (P) can be an alternative to the standard nasal masks (N), although there are no data about their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and adherence to CPAP therapy delivered with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients. Methods: A retrospective observational design involving a series of consecutive CPAP-naïve patients affected by OSAS. After an initial mask fitting session all patients were allowed to choose the type of nasal interface (N or P) they preferred. Outcomes were assessed 5 days after CPAP titration, and after 2 and 12 months. Patients were offered the option of switching to an alternative mask if needed. Results: Data from 144 patients were analyzed. Subjects were predominantly male (76%), middle aged (58.14 ± 12.86), moderately obese (body mass index: 33.89 ± 7.56), and affected by severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index: 47.60 ± 21.31). A total of 102 patients (70.8%) chose P, and 42 (29.2%) chose N. Clinical and polygraphic features, and CPAP pressure levels were similar in P and N groups, both at baseline and at 12 months. A good adherence to treatment was observed in both groups (P, 5.5 ± 1.8 h; N, 5.3 ± 1.5 h). Seventy-six patients (53%) reported at least one side effect during the whole study period, without statistically significant between-group differences. Nostril pain was the most frequent side effect in P. Conclusions: Nasal pillows showed equal long-term effectiveness and objective adherence as standard nasal masks.

AB - Backgrounds: Mask-related side effects can negatively influence adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Nasal pillows (P) can be an alternative to the standard nasal masks (N), although there are no data about their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess long-term effectiveness and adherence to CPAP therapy delivered with nasal pillows in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients. Methods: A retrospective observational design involving a series of consecutive CPAP-naïve patients affected by OSAS. After an initial mask fitting session all patients were allowed to choose the type of nasal interface (N or P) they preferred. Outcomes were assessed 5 days after CPAP titration, and after 2 and 12 months. Patients were offered the option of switching to an alternative mask if needed. Results: Data from 144 patients were analyzed. Subjects were predominantly male (76%), middle aged (58.14 ± 12.86), moderately obese (body mass index: 33.89 ± 7.56), and affected by severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index: 47.60 ± 21.31). A total of 102 patients (70.8%) chose P, and 42 (29.2%) chose N. Clinical and polygraphic features, and CPAP pressure levels were similar in P and N groups, both at baseline and at 12 months. A good adherence to treatment was observed in both groups (P, 5.5 ± 1.8 h; N, 5.3 ± 1.5 h). Seventy-six patients (53%) reported at least one side effect during the whole study period, without statistically significant between-group differences. Nostril pain was the most frequent side effect in P. Conclusions: Nasal pillows showed equal long-term effectiveness and objective adherence as standard nasal masks.

KW - Adherence

KW - Continuous positive airway pressure

KW - Interface

KW - Mask

KW - Nasal pillows

KW - Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035240184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035240184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.08.024

DO - 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.08.024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035240184

JO - Sleep Medicine

JF - Sleep Medicine

SN - 1389-9457

ER -