Contrast enhanced breast MRI: Spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results

Luca Alessandro Carbonaro, Penampai Tannaphai, Rubina Manuela Trimboli, Nicola Verardi, Maria Paola Fedeli, Francesco Sardanelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the spatial displacement of breast lesions and nipples in MR images when the patient is moved from the standard prone to a supine position close to ultrasound (US) or surgical setting. Materials and methods: Eleven patients underwent breast MRI in prone position with dynamic 3D T1-weighted sequences using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. Subsequently, the patient was repositioned in supine position and a 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination sequence was acquired using a thoracic surface coil. For both positions we measured the following minimal distances: (A) from lesion margin to the coronal plane passing through the anterior surface of the sternum, antero-posterior, on native axial images; (B) from lesion margin to the medial sagittal plane, on native axial images, latero-medial; (C) from lesion margin to the axial plane passing through the tracheal bifurcation, cranio-caudal; (D) from lesion margin to the thoracic wall/pectoral muscle, on native axial images; (E) from lesion margin to the skin, on native axial images; (F) from lesion margin to the base of the nipple, on oblique reconstructions. Measurements from A to D were also obtained for each nipple. The prone-to-supine spatial displacement was calculated as the absolute difference between the measurement obtained in supine position and the same measurement obtained in prone position. Displacements were presented as mean ± standard deviation and median in parenthesis. Results: Lesion displacements were (mm): A = 60 ± 38 (55); B = 40 ± 26 (41); C = 41 ± 33 (34); D = 32 ± 31 (27); E = 6 ± 5 (7); and F = 8 ± 6 (7). Nipple displacements were (mm): A = 84 ± 44 (91); B = 54 ± 24 (56); C = 27 ± 15 (24); and D = 48 ± 20 (48). Conclusion: These preliminary results show that preoperative breast MRI in prone position implies a median lesion displacement of about 3-6 cm along the three orthogonal directions in comparison with supine MRI. Conversely, median lesion-to-skin and lesion-to-nipple displacements were less than 1 cm, even though nipple displacements were similar to or larger than those of lesions. The lesion-to-nipple distance may be the most reliable measure to be used for second look breast US. Larger studies are warranted in order to define an optimized breast MRI protocol in the preoperative setting.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume81
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Nipples
Supine Position
Breast
Prone Position
Pectoralis Muscles
Skin
Sternum
Thoracic Wall
Thorax

Keywords

  • Breast MRI
  • Lesion spatial displacement
  • Prone position
  • Supine position

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Contrast enhanced breast MRI : Spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results. / Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro; Tannaphai, Penampai; Trimboli, Rubina Manuela; Verardi, Nicola; Fedeli, Maria Paola; Sardanelli, Francesco.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 81, No. 6, 06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro ; Tannaphai, Penampai ; Trimboli, Rubina Manuela ; Verardi, Nicola ; Fedeli, Maria Paola ; Sardanelli, Francesco. / Contrast enhanced breast MRI : Spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results. In: European Journal of Radiology. 2012 ; Vol. 81, No. 6.
@article{397ae1f955b6452ba55aff38ce0847c0,
title = "Contrast enhanced breast MRI: Spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results",
abstract = "Objective: To estimate the spatial displacement of breast lesions and nipples in MR images when the patient is moved from the standard prone to a supine position close to ultrasound (US) or surgical setting. Materials and methods: Eleven patients underwent breast MRI in prone position with dynamic 3D T1-weighted sequences using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. Subsequently, the patient was repositioned in supine position and a 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination sequence was acquired using a thoracic surface coil. For both positions we measured the following minimal distances: (A) from lesion margin to the coronal plane passing through the anterior surface of the sternum, antero-posterior, on native axial images; (B) from lesion margin to the medial sagittal plane, on native axial images, latero-medial; (C) from lesion margin to the axial plane passing through the tracheal bifurcation, cranio-caudal; (D) from lesion margin to the thoracic wall/pectoral muscle, on native axial images; (E) from lesion margin to the skin, on native axial images; (F) from lesion margin to the base of the nipple, on oblique reconstructions. Measurements from A to D were also obtained for each nipple. The prone-to-supine spatial displacement was calculated as the absolute difference between the measurement obtained in supine position and the same measurement obtained in prone position. Displacements were presented as mean ± standard deviation and median in parenthesis. Results: Lesion displacements were (mm): A = 60 ± 38 (55); B = 40 ± 26 (41); C = 41 ± 33 (34); D = 32 ± 31 (27); E = 6 ± 5 (7); and F = 8 ± 6 (7). Nipple displacements were (mm): A = 84 ± 44 (91); B = 54 ± 24 (56); C = 27 ± 15 (24); and D = 48 ± 20 (48). Conclusion: These preliminary results show that preoperative breast MRI in prone position implies a median lesion displacement of about 3-6 cm along the three orthogonal directions in comparison with supine MRI. Conversely, median lesion-to-skin and lesion-to-nipple displacements were less than 1 cm, even though nipple displacements were similar to or larger than those of lesions. The lesion-to-nipple distance may be the most reliable measure to be used for second look breast US. Larger studies are warranted in order to define an optimized breast MRI protocol in the preoperative setting.",
keywords = "Breast MRI, Lesion spatial displacement, Prone position, Supine position",
author = "Carbonaro, {Luca Alessandro} and Penampai Tannaphai and Trimboli, {Rubina Manuela} and Nicola Verardi and Fedeli, {Maria Paola} and Francesco Sardanelli",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.013",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
journal = "European Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast enhanced breast MRI

T2 - Spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results

AU - Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro

AU - Tannaphai, Penampai

AU - Trimboli, Rubina Manuela

AU - Verardi, Nicola

AU - Fedeli, Maria Paola

AU - Sardanelli, Francesco

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Objective: To estimate the spatial displacement of breast lesions and nipples in MR images when the patient is moved from the standard prone to a supine position close to ultrasound (US) or surgical setting. Materials and methods: Eleven patients underwent breast MRI in prone position with dynamic 3D T1-weighted sequences using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. Subsequently, the patient was repositioned in supine position and a 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination sequence was acquired using a thoracic surface coil. For both positions we measured the following minimal distances: (A) from lesion margin to the coronal plane passing through the anterior surface of the sternum, antero-posterior, on native axial images; (B) from lesion margin to the medial sagittal plane, on native axial images, latero-medial; (C) from lesion margin to the axial plane passing through the tracheal bifurcation, cranio-caudal; (D) from lesion margin to the thoracic wall/pectoral muscle, on native axial images; (E) from lesion margin to the skin, on native axial images; (F) from lesion margin to the base of the nipple, on oblique reconstructions. Measurements from A to D were also obtained for each nipple. The prone-to-supine spatial displacement was calculated as the absolute difference between the measurement obtained in supine position and the same measurement obtained in prone position. Displacements were presented as mean ± standard deviation and median in parenthesis. Results: Lesion displacements were (mm): A = 60 ± 38 (55); B = 40 ± 26 (41); C = 41 ± 33 (34); D = 32 ± 31 (27); E = 6 ± 5 (7); and F = 8 ± 6 (7). Nipple displacements were (mm): A = 84 ± 44 (91); B = 54 ± 24 (56); C = 27 ± 15 (24); and D = 48 ± 20 (48). Conclusion: These preliminary results show that preoperative breast MRI in prone position implies a median lesion displacement of about 3-6 cm along the three orthogonal directions in comparison with supine MRI. Conversely, median lesion-to-skin and lesion-to-nipple displacements were less than 1 cm, even though nipple displacements were similar to or larger than those of lesions. The lesion-to-nipple distance may be the most reliable measure to be used for second look breast US. Larger studies are warranted in order to define an optimized breast MRI protocol in the preoperative setting.

AB - Objective: To estimate the spatial displacement of breast lesions and nipples in MR images when the patient is moved from the standard prone to a supine position close to ultrasound (US) or surgical setting. Materials and methods: Eleven patients underwent breast MRI in prone position with dynamic 3D T1-weighted sequences using 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. Subsequently, the patient was repositioned in supine position and a 3D volumetric interpolated breathhold examination sequence was acquired using a thoracic surface coil. For both positions we measured the following minimal distances: (A) from lesion margin to the coronal plane passing through the anterior surface of the sternum, antero-posterior, on native axial images; (B) from lesion margin to the medial sagittal plane, on native axial images, latero-medial; (C) from lesion margin to the axial plane passing through the tracheal bifurcation, cranio-caudal; (D) from lesion margin to the thoracic wall/pectoral muscle, on native axial images; (E) from lesion margin to the skin, on native axial images; (F) from lesion margin to the base of the nipple, on oblique reconstructions. Measurements from A to D were also obtained for each nipple. The prone-to-supine spatial displacement was calculated as the absolute difference between the measurement obtained in supine position and the same measurement obtained in prone position. Displacements were presented as mean ± standard deviation and median in parenthesis. Results: Lesion displacements were (mm): A = 60 ± 38 (55); B = 40 ± 26 (41); C = 41 ± 33 (34); D = 32 ± 31 (27); E = 6 ± 5 (7); and F = 8 ± 6 (7). Nipple displacements were (mm): A = 84 ± 44 (91); B = 54 ± 24 (56); C = 27 ± 15 (24); and D = 48 ± 20 (48). Conclusion: These preliminary results show that preoperative breast MRI in prone position implies a median lesion displacement of about 3-6 cm along the three orthogonal directions in comparison with supine MRI. Conversely, median lesion-to-skin and lesion-to-nipple displacements were less than 1 cm, even though nipple displacements were similar to or larger than those of lesions. The lesion-to-nipple distance may be the most reliable measure to be used for second look breast US. Larger studies are warranted in order to define an optimized breast MRI protocol in the preoperative setting.

KW - Breast MRI

KW - Lesion spatial displacement

KW - Prone position

KW - Supine position

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860719477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860719477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 22502792

AN - SCOPUS:84860719477

VL - 81

JO - European Journal of Radiology

JF - European Journal of Radiology

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 6

ER -