Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next?

Harry W. Vallack, Dick J. Bakker, Ingvar Brandt, Eva Broström-Lundén, Abraham Brouwer, Keith R. Bull, Clair Gough, Ramon Guardans, Ivan Holoubek, Bo Jansson, Rainer Koch, Johan Kuylenstierna, André Lecloux, Donald Mackay, Patrick McCutcheon, Paolo Mocarelli, Rob D F Taalman, Nicole G. Weavers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

217 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Within the context of current international initiatives on the control of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), an overview is given of the scientific knowledge relating to POP sources, emissions, transport, fate and effects. At the regional scale, improvements in mass balance models for well-characterised POPs are resulting in an ability to estimate their environmental concentrations with sufficient accuracy to be of help for some regulatory purposes. The relevance of the parameters used to define POPs within these international initiatives is considered with an emphasis on mechanisms for adding new substances to the initial lists. A tiered approach is proposed for screening the large number of untested chemical substances according to their long-range transport potential, persistence and bioaccumulative potential prior to more detailed risk assessments. The importance of testing candidate POPs for chronic toxicity (i.e. for immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption and carcinogenicity) is emphasised as is a need for the further development of relevant SAR (structure activity relationship) models and in vitro and in vivo tests for these effects. Where there is a high level of uncertainty at the risk assessment stage, decision-makers may have to rely on expert judgement and weight-of-evidence, taking into account the precautionary principle and the views of relevant stake-holders. Close co-operation between the various international initiatives on POPs will be required to ensure that assessment criteria and procedures are as compatible as possible. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-175
Number of pages33
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 1998

Fingerprint

Organic pollutants
Aptitude
Structure-Activity Relationship
Uncertainty
Weights and Measures
Risk assessment
Toxicity
Screening
Testing
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Bioaccumulation
  • Biomagnification
  • Carcinogenicity
  • Chronic toxicity
  • Endocrine disruption
  • Global distillation
  • Immunotoxicity
  • Monitoring
  • Persistence
  • Persistent organic pollutants
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Vallack, H. W., Bakker, D. J., Brandt, I., Broström-Lundén, E., Brouwer, A., Bull, K. R., ... Weavers, N. G. (1998). Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next? Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 6(3), 143-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(98)00036-2

Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next? / Vallack, Harry W.; Bakker, Dick J.; Brandt, Ingvar; Broström-Lundén, Eva; Brouwer, Abraham; Bull, Keith R.; Gough, Clair; Guardans, Ramon; Holoubek, Ivan; Jansson, Bo; Koch, Rainer; Kuylenstierna, Johan; Lecloux, André; Mackay, Donald; McCutcheon, Patrick; Mocarelli, Paolo; Taalman, Rob D F; Weavers, Nicole G.

In: Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.11.1998, p. 143-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vallack, HW, Bakker, DJ, Brandt, I, Broström-Lundén, E, Brouwer, A, Bull, KR, Gough, C, Guardans, R, Holoubek, I, Jansson, B, Koch, R, Kuylenstierna, J, Lecloux, A, Mackay, D, McCutcheon, P, Mocarelli, P, Taalman, RDF & Weavers, NG 1998, 'Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next?', Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 143-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(98)00036-2
Vallack HW, Bakker DJ, Brandt I, Broström-Lundén E, Brouwer A, Bull KR et al. Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next? Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 1998 Nov 1;6(3):143-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(98)00036-2
Vallack, Harry W. ; Bakker, Dick J. ; Brandt, Ingvar ; Broström-Lundén, Eva ; Brouwer, Abraham ; Bull, Keith R. ; Gough, Clair ; Guardans, Ramon ; Holoubek, Ivan ; Jansson, Bo ; Koch, Rainer ; Kuylenstierna, Johan ; Lecloux, André ; Mackay, Donald ; McCutcheon, Patrick ; Mocarelli, Paolo ; Taalman, Rob D F ; Weavers, Nicole G. / Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next?. In: Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 1998 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 143-175.
@article{2fde5dd8034f4fef9119aaf04e4c5d82,
title = "Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next?",
abstract = "Within the context of current international initiatives on the control of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), an overview is given of the scientific knowledge relating to POP sources, emissions, transport, fate and effects. At the regional scale, improvements in mass balance models for well-characterised POPs are resulting in an ability to estimate their environmental concentrations with sufficient accuracy to be of help for some regulatory purposes. The relevance of the parameters used to define POPs within these international initiatives is considered with an emphasis on mechanisms for adding new substances to the initial lists. A tiered approach is proposed for screening the large number of untested chemical substances according to their long-range transport potential, persistence and bioaccumulative potential prior to more detailed risk assessments. The importance of testing candidate POPs for chronic toxicity (i.e. for immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption and carcinogenicity) is emphasised as is a need for the further development of relevant SAR (structure activity relationship) models and in vitro and in vivo tests for these effects. Where there is a high level of uncertainty at the risk assessment stage, decision-makers may have to rely on expert judgement and weight-of-evidence, taking into account the precautionary principle and the views of relevant stake-holders. Close co-operation between the various international initiatives on POPs will be required to ensure that assessment criteria and procedures are as compatible as possible. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Bioaccumulation, Biomagnification, Carcinogenicity, Chronic toxicity, Endocrine disruption, Global distillation, Immunotoxicity, Monitoring, Persistence, Persistent organic pollutants, Risk assessment",
author = "Vallack, {Harry W.} and Bakker, {Dick J.} and Ingvar Brandt and Eva Brostr{\"o}m-Lund{\'e}n and Abraham Brouwer and Bull, {Keith R.} and Clair Gough and Ramon Guardans and Ivan Holoubek and Bo Jansson and Rainer Koch and Johan Kuylenstierna and Andr{\'e} Lecloux and Donald Mackay and Patrick McCutcheon and Paolo Mocarelli and Taalman, {Rob D F} and Weavers, {Nicole G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1382-6689(98)00036-2",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "143--175",
journal = "Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology",
issn = "1382-6689",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controlling persistent organic pollutants-what next?

AU - Vallack, Harry W.

AU - Bakker, Dick J.

AU - Brandt, Ingvar

AU - Broström-Lundén, Eva

AU - Brouwer, Abraham

AU - Bull, Keith R.

AU - Gough, Clair

AU - Guardans, Ramon

AU - Holoubek, Ivan

AU - Jansson, Bo

AU - Koch, Rainer

AU - Kuylenstierna, Johan

AU - Lecloux, André

AU - Mackay, Donald

AU - McCutcheon, Patrick

AU - Mocarelli, Paolo

AU - Taalman, Rob D F

AU - Weavers, Nicole G.

PY - 1998/11/1

Y1 - 1998/11/1

N2 - Within the context of current international initiatives on the control of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), an overview is given of the scientific knowledge relating to POP sources, emissions, transport, fate and effects. At the regional scale, improvements in mass balance models for well-characterised POPs are resulting in an ability to estimate their environmental concentrations with sufficient accuracy to be of help for some regulatory purposes. The relevance of the parameters used to define POPs within these international initiatives is considered with an emphasis on mechanisms for adding new substances to the initial lists. A tiered approach is proposed for screening the large number of untested chemical substances according to their long-range transport potential, persistence and bioaccumulative potential prior to more detailed risk assessments. The importance of testing candidate POPs for chronic toxicity (i.e. for immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption and carcinogenicity) is emphasised as is a need for the further development of relevant SAR (structure activity relationship) models and in vitro and in vivo tests for these effects. Where there is a high level of uncertainty at the risk assessment stage, decision-makers may have to rely on expert judgement and weight-of-evidence, taking into account the precautionary principle and the views of relevant stake-holders. Close co-operation between the various international initiatives on POPs will be required to ensure that assessment criteria and procedures are as compatible as possible. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - Within the context of current international initiatives on the control of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), an overview is given of the scientific knowledge relating to POP sources, emissions, transport, fate and effects. At the regional scale, improvements in mass balance models for well-characterised POPs are resulting in an ability to estimate their environmental concentrations with sufficient accuracy to be of help for some regulatory purposes. The relevance of the parameters used to define POPs within these international initiatives is considered with an emphasis on mechanisms for adding new substances to the initial lists. A tiered approach is proposed for screening the large number of untested chemical substances according to their long-range transport potential, persistence and bioaccumulative potential prior to more detailed risk assessments. The importance of testing candidate POPs for chronic toxicity (i.e. for immunotoxicity, endocrine disruption and carcinogenicity) is emphasised as is a need for the further development of relevant SAR (structure activity relationship) models and in vitro and in vivo tests for these effects. Where there is a high level of uncertainty at the risk assessment stage, decision-makers may have to rely on expert judgement and weight-of-evidence, taking into account the precautionary principle and the views of relevant stake-holders. Close co-operation between the various international initiatives on POPs will be required to ensure that assessment criteria and procedures are as compatible as possible. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Bioaccumulation

KW - Biomagnification

KW - Carcinogenicity

KW - Chronic toxicity

KW - Endocrine disruption

KW - Global distillation

KW - Immunotoxicity

KW - Monitoring

KW - Persistence

KW - Persistent organic pollutants

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031760529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031760529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1382-6689(98)00036-2

DO - 10.1016/S1382-6689(98)00036-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031760529

VL - 6

SP - 143

EP - 175

JO - Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology

JF - Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology

SN - 1382-6689

IS - 3

ER -