Coordinate frames for naming misoriented chimerics: A case study of visuo-spatial neglect

G. Di Pellegrino, F. Frassinetti, G. Basso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A persistent line of inquiry for the students of visuo-spatial neglect has involved the perceptual frame of reference respect to which the neglected region of space is defined. On standard testing conditions viewer-centered and object-centered systems of coordinates are confounded. In order to disambiguate these two reference frames FB, a patient with severe left visual neglect consequent upon a right parieto-temporal haemorrhage, was asked to identify chimeric figures presented at different orientations. FB continued to recognize poorly the left side of chimeric figures even when the display was rotated 90° clockwise or anticlockwise so that the 'left' of the chimeric fell on the patient's egocentric up or down, respectively. The result suggests that, at least under the present testing conditions, unilateral neglect is tied to the principal (top-bottom) axis of the object. Object-centered vs. (viewer-centered) representational accounts of this finding are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)767-777
Number of pages11
JournalCortex
Volume31
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Hemorrhage
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Coordinate frames for naming misoriented chimerics : A case study of visuo-spatial neglect. / Di Pellegrino, G.; Frassinetti, F.; Basso, G.

In: Cortex, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1995, p. 767-777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40dcd10a819b44679c839d74b304396e,
title = "Coordinate frames for naming misoriented chimerics: A case study of visuo-spatial neglect",
abstract = "A persistent line of inquiry for the students of visuo-spatial neglect has involved the perceptual frame of reference respect to which the neglected region of space is defined. On standard testing conditions viewer-centered and object-centered systems of coordinates are confounded. In order to disambiguate these two reference frames FB, a patient with severe left visual neglect consequent upon a right parieto-temporal haemorrhage, was asked to identify chimeric figures presented at different orientations. FB continued to recognize poorly the left side of chimeric figures even when the display was rotated 90° clockwise or anticlockwise so that the 'left' of the chimeric fell on the patient's egocentric up or down, respectively. The result suggests that, at least under the present testing conditions, unilateral neglect is tied to the principal (top-bottom) axis of the object. Object-centered vs. (viewer-centered) representational accounts of this finding are discussed.",
author = "{Di Pellegrino}, G. and F. Frassinetti and G. Basso",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "767--777",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coordinate frames for naming misoriented chimerics

T2 - A case study of visuo-spatial neglect

AU - Di Pellegrino, G.

AU - Frassinetti, F.

AU - Basso, G.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - A persistent line of inquiry for the students of visuo-spatial neglect has involved the perceptual frame of reference respect to which the neglected region of space is defined. On standard testing conditions viewer-centered and object-centered systems of coordinates are confounded. In order to disambiguate these two reference frames FB, a patient with severe left visual neglect consequent upon a right parieto-temporal haemorrhage, was asked to identify chimeric figures presented at different orientations. FB continued to recognize poorly the left side of chimeric figures even when the display was rotated 90° clockwise or anticlockwise so that the 'left' of the chimeric fell on the patient's egocentric up or down, respectively. The result suggests that, at least under the present testing conditions, unilateral neglect is tied to the principal (top-bottom) axis of the object. Object-centered vs. (viewer-centered) representational accounts of this finding are discussed.

AB - A persistent line of inquiry for the students of visuo-spatial neglect has involved the perceptual frame of reference respect to which the neglected region of space is defined. On standard testing conditions viewer-centered and object-centered systems of coordinates are confounded. In order to disambiguate these two reference frames FB, a patient with severe left visual neglect consequent upon a right parieto-temporal haemorrhage, was asked to identify chimeric figures presented at different orientations. FB continued to recognize poorly the left side of chimeric figures even when the display was rotated 90° clockwise or anticlockwise so that the 'left' of the chimeric fell on the patient's egocentric up or down, respectively. The result suggests that, at least under the present testing conditions, unilateral neglect is tied to the principal (top-bottom) axis of the object. Object-centered vs. (viewer-centered) representational accounts of this finding are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029558929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029558929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8750033

AN - SCOPUS:0029558929

VL - 31

SP - 767

EP - 777

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 4

ER -