COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality

Contrasting evidences

F. Braido, F. Di Marco, P. Santus, N. Scichilone, A. G. Corsico, P. Solidoro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding whether the ABCD GOLD classification method is informative with respect to the spirometric classification of severity in predicting mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is subject of debate. The results of a study performed on a sample of the Norwegian population (HUNT2) were recently published. Such data showed the inferiority of ABCD classification in predicting mortality compared to the spirometric classification, which was considered the gold standard up to the 2011 version of GOLD guidelines. This result is not in line with the results of other studies that have shown the equivalence of the two classifications. The new GOLD classification seemed to be a step forward for what concerns understanding patient's needs, but it seems clear that the insertion of a single clinical variable to the spirometric data may not be exhaustive in describing all the phenomena related to a heterogeneous disease such as COPD. The publication of the HUNT study provides an opportunity to analyze how the evidence has been produced, which scientific speculations it offers, what considerations could be drawn and what further research would be appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalMinerva Medica
Volume104
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Mortality
Publications
Guidelines
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Chronic obstructive
  • Chronic obstructive-pulmonary disease
  • Epidemiology
  • Lung diseases
  • Pulmonary disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Braido, F., Di Marco, F., Santus, P., Scichilone, N., Corsico, A. G., & Solidoro, P. (2013). COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality: Contrasting evidences. Minerva Medica, 104(6), 1-5.

COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality : Contrasting evidences. / Braido, F.; Di Marco, F.; Santus, P.; Scichilone, N.; Corsico, A. G.; Solidoro, P.

In: Minerva Medica, Vol. 104, No. 6, 2013, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Braido, F, Di Marco, F, Santus, P, Scichilone, N, Corsico, AG & Solidoro, P 2013, 'COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality: Contrasting evidences', Minerva Medica, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1-5.
Braido F, Di Marco F, Santus P, Scichilone N, Corsico AG, Solidoro P. COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality: Contrasting evidences. Minerva Medica. 2013;104(6):1-5.
Braido, F. ; Di Marco, F. ; Santus, P. ; Scichilone, N. ; Corsico, A. G. ; Solidoro, P. / COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality : Contrasting evidences. In: Minerva Medica. 2013 ; Vol. 104, No. 6. pp. 1-5.
@article{36fd482c0f014538ba71604a37456e70,
title = "COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality: Contrasting evidences",
abstract = "Understanding whether the ABCD GOLD classification method is informative with respect to the spirometric classification of severity in predicting mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is subject of debate. The results of a study performed on a sample of the Norwegian population (HUNT2) were recently published. Such data showed the inferiority of ABCD classification in predicting mortality compared to the spirometric classification, which was considered the gold standard up to the 2011 version of GOLD guidelines. This result is not in line with the results of other studies that have shown the equivalence of the two classifications. The new GOLD classification seemed to be a step forward for what concerns understanding patient's needs, but it seems clear that the insertion of a single clinical variable to the spirometric data may not be exhaustive in describing all the phenomena related to a heterogeneous disease such as COPD. The publication of the HUNT study provides an opportunity to analyze how the evidence has been produced, which scientific speculations it offers, what considerations could be drawn and what further research would be appropriate.",
keywords = "Chronic obstructive, Chronic obstructive-pulmonary disease, Epidemiology, Lung diseases, Pulmonary disease",
author = "F. Braido and {Di Marco}, F. and P. Santus and N. Scichilone and Corsico, {A. G.} and P. Solidoro",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Minerva Medicolegale e Archivio di Antropologia Criminale",
issn = "0026-4806",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COPD classification methods and informativeness on mortality

T2 - Contrasting evidences

AU - Braido, F.

AU - Di Marco, F.

AU - Santus, P.

AU - Scichilone, N.

AU - Corsico, A. G.

AU - Solidoro, P.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Understanding whether the ABCD GOLD classification method is informative with respect to the spirometric classification of severity in predicting mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is subject of debate. The results of a study performed on a sample of the Norwegian population (HUNT2) were recently published. Such data showed the inferiority of ABCD classification in predicting mortality compared to the spirometric classification, which was considered the gold standard up to the 2011 version of GOLD guidelines. This result is not in line with the results of other studies that have shown the equivalence of the two classifications. The new GOLD classification seemed to be a step forward for what concerns understanding patient's needs, but it seems clear that the insertion of a single clinical variable to the spirometric data may not be exhaustive in describing all the phenomena related to a heterogeneous disease such as COPD. The publication of the HUNT study provides an opportunity to analyze how the evidence has been produced, which scientific speculations it offers, what considerations could be drawn and what further research would be appropriate.

AB - Understanding whether the ABCD GOLD classification method is informative with respect to the spirometric classification of severity in predicting mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is subject of debate. The results of a study performed on a sample of the Norwegian population (HUNT2) were recently published. Such data showed the inferiority of ABCD classification in predicting mortality compared to the spirometric classification, which was considered the gold standard up to the 2011 version of GOLD guidelines. This result is not in line with the results of other studies that have shown the equivalence of the two classifications. The new GOLD classification seemed to be a step forward for what concerns understanding patient's needs, but it seems clear that the insertion of a single clinical variable to the spirometric data may not be exhaustive in describing all the phenomena related to a heterogeneous disease such as COPD. The publication of the HUNT study provides an opportunity to analyze how the evidence has been produced, which scientific speculations it offers, what considerations could be drawn and what further research would be appropriate.

KW - Chronic obstructive

KW - Chronic obstructive-pulmonary disease

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Lung diseases

KW - Pulmonary disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927656703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927656703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Minerva Medicolegale e Archivio di Antropologia Criminale

JF - Minerva Medicolegale e Archivio di Antropologia Criminale

SN - 0026-4806

IS - 6

ER -