Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies: Fertility and Sterility

E Somigliana, A Busnelli, A Paffoni, P Viganò, A Riccaboni, C Rubio, A Capalbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objective: To evaluate the economical benefit of preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidies (PGT-A) when applied in an extended culture and stringent elective single ET framework. Design: Theoretical cost-effectiveness study. Setting: Not applicable. Patients/Animal(s): None. Intervention(s): Comparison of the cost-effectiveness between two IVF treatment strategies: serial transfer of all available blastocysts without genetic testing (first fresh transfer and subsequent frozen-thawed transfer); and systematic use of genetic testing (trophectoderm biopsy, freeze-all, and frozen-thawed transfers of euploid blastocysts). The costs considered for this analysis are based on regional public health system provider. Main Outcome Measure(s): Costs per live birth. Result(s): Cost-effectiveness profile of PGT-A improves with female age and number of available blastocysts. Sensitivity analyses varying the costs of ET, the costs of genetic analyses, the magnitude of the detrimental impact of PGT-A on live birth rate, and the crude live birth rates change to some extent the thresholds for effectiveness but generally confirm the notion that PGT-A can be economically advantageous in some specific subgroups. Conclusion(s): PGT-A can be cost-effective in specific clinical settings and population groups. Economic considerations deserve attention in the debate regarding the clinical utility of PGT-A. © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1169-1176
Number of pages8
JournalFertility and Sterility
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies: Fertility and Sterility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this