Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL

Daniela Ginocchio, Enrico Alfonsi, F. Mozzanica, Anna Rosa Accornero, Antonella Bergonzoni, Giulia Chiarello, Nicoletta de Luca, Daniele Farneti, Marilia Simonelli, Paola Calcagno, Valentina Turroni, Antonio Schindler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian SWAL-QOL (I-SWAL-QOL). The study consisted of five phases: item generation, reliability analysis, normative data generation, validity analysis, and responsiveness analysis. The item generation phase followed the five-step, cross-cultural, adaptation process of translation and back-translation. A group of 92 dysphagic patients was enrolled for the internal consistency analysis. Seventy-eight patients completed the I-SWAL-QOL twice, 2 weeks apart, for test–retest reliability analysis. A group of 200 asymptomatic subjects completed the I-SWAL-QOL for normative data generation. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained by both the group of dysphagic subjects and asymptomatic ones were compared for validity analysis. I-SWAL-QOL scores were correlated with SF-36 scores in 67 patients with dysphagia for concurrent validity analysis. Finally, I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in a group of 30 dysphagic patients before and after successful rehabilitation treatment were compared for responsiveness analysis. All the enrolled patients managed to complete the I-SWAL-QOL without needing any assistance, within 20 min. Internal consistency was acceptable for all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (α > 0.70). Test–retest reliability was also satisfactory for all subscales (ICC > 0.7). A significant difference between the dysphagic group and the control group was found in all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (p <0.05). Mild to moderate correlations between I-SWAL-QOL and SF-36 subscales were observed. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in the pre-treatment condition were significantly lower than those obtained after swallowing rehabilitation. I-SWAL-QOL is reliable, valid, responsive to changes in QOL, and recommended for clinical practice and outcome research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalDysphagia
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jul 21 2016

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders
Reproducibility of Results
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Control Groups
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Deglutition
  • Dysphagia
  • Outcome
  • Self-assessment
  • Swallowing disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Ginocchio, D., Alfonsi, E., Mozzanica, F., Accornero, A. R., Bergonzoni, A., Chiarello, G., ... Schindler, A. (Accepted/In press). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL. / Ginocchio, Daniela; Alfonsi, Enrico; Mozzanica, F.; Accornero, Anna Rosa; Bergonzoni, Antonella; Chiarello, Giulia; de Luca, Nicoletta; Farneti, Daniele; Simonelli, Marilia; Calcagno, Paola; Turroni, Valentina; Schindler, Antonio.

In: Dysphagia, 21.07.2016, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ginocchio, D, Alfonsi, E, Mozzanica, F, Accornero, AR, Bergonzoni, A, Chiarello, G, de Luca, N, Farneti, D, Simonelli, M, Calcagno, P, Turroni, V & Schindler, A 2016, 'Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL', Dysphagia, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z
Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, Accornero AR, Bergonzoni A, Chiarello G et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016 Jul 21;1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z
Ginocchio, Daniela ; Alfonsi, Enrico ; Mozzanica, F. ; Accornero, Anna Rosa ; Bergonzoni, Antonella ; Chiarello, Giulia ; de Luca, Nicoletta ; Farneti, Daniele ; Simonelli, Marilia ; Calcagno, Paola ; Turroni, Valentina ; Schindler, Antonio. / Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL. In: Dysphagia. 2016 ; pp. 1-9.
@article{9ddefabde6d141e7a74076a2a2d34aee,
title = "Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL",
abstract = "The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian SWAL-QOL (I-SWAL-QOL). The study consisted of five phases: item generation, reliability analysis, normative data generation, validity analysis, and responsiveness analysis. The item generation phase followed the five-step, cross-cultural, adaptation process of translation and back-translation. A group of 92 dysphagic patients was enrolled for the internal consistency analysis. Seventy-eight patients completed the I-SWAL-QOL twice, 2 weeks apart, for test–retest reliability analysis. A group of 200 asymptomatic subjects completed the I-SWAL-QOL for normative data generation. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained by both the group of dysphagic subjects and asymptomatic ones were compared for validity analysis. I-SWAL-QOL scores were correlated with SF-36 scores in 67 patients with dysphagia for concurrent validity analysis. Finally, I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in a group of 30 dysphagic patients before and after successful rehabilitation treatment were compared for responsiveness analysis. All the enrolled patients managed to complete the I-SWAL-QOL without needing any assistance, within 20 min. Internal consistency was acceptable for all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (α > 0.70). Test–retest reliability was also satisfactory for all subscales (ICC > 0.7). A significant difference between the dysphagic group and the control group was found in all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (p <0.05). Mild to moderate correlations between I-SWAL-QOL and SF-36 subscales were observed. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in the pre-treatment condition were significantly lower than those obtained after swallowing rehabilitation. I-SWAL-QOL is reliable, valid, responsive to changes in QOL, and recommended for clinical practice and outcome research.",
keywords = "Deglutition, Dysphagia, Outcome, Self-assessment, Swallowing disorders",
author = "Daniela Ginocchio and Enrico Alfonsi and F. Mozzanica and Accornero, {Anna Rosa} and Antonella Bergonzoni and Giulia Chiarello and {de Luca}, Nicoletta and Daniele Farneti and Marilia Simonelli and Paola Calcagno and Valentina Turroni and Antonio Schindler",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z",
language = "English",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Dysphagia",
issn = "0179-051X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of SWAL-QOL

AU - Ginocchio, Daniela

AU - Alfonsi, Enrico

AU - Mozzanica, F.

AU - Accornero, Anna Rosa

AU - Bergonzoni, Antonella

AU - Chiarello, Giulia

AU - de Luca, Nicoletta

AU - Farneti, Daniele

AU - Simonelli, Marilia

AU - Calcagno, Paola

AU - Turroni, Valentina

AU - Schindler, Antonio

PY - 2016/7/21

Y1 - 2016/7/21

N2 - The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian SWAL-QOL (I-SWAL-QOL). The study consisted of five phases: item generation, reliability analysis, normative data generation, validity analysis, and responsiveness analysis. The item generation phase followed the five-step, cross-cultural, adaptation process of translation and back-translation. A group of 92 dysphagic patients was enrolled for the internal consistency analysis. Seventy-eight patients completed the I-SWAL-QOL twice, 2 weeks apart, for test–retest reliability analysis. A group of 200 asymptomatic subjects completed the I-SWAL-QOL for normative data generation. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained by both the group of dysphagic subjects and asymptomatic ones were compared for validity analysis. I-SWAL-QOL scores were correlated with SF-36 scores in 67 patients with dysphagia for concurrent validity analysis. Finally, I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in a group of 30 dysphagic patients before and after successful rehabilitation treatment were compared for responsiveness analysis. All the enrolled patients managed to complete the I-SWAL-QOL without needing any assistance, within 20 min. Internal consistency was acceptable for all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (α > 0.70). Test–retest reliability was also satisfactory for all subscales (ICC > 0.7). A significant difference between the dysphagic group and the control group was found in all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (p <0.05). Mild to moderate correlations between I-SWAL-QOL and SF-36 subscales were observed. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in the pre-treatment condition were significantly lower than those obtained after swallowing rehabilitation. I-SWAL-QOL is reliable, valid, responsive to changes in QOL, and recommended for clinical practice and outcome research.

AB - The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian SWAL-QOL (I-SWAL-QOL). The study consisted of five phases: item generation, reliability analysis, normative data generation, validity analysis, and responsiveness analysis. The item generation phase followed the five-step, cross-cultural, adaptation process of translation and back-translation. A group of 92 dysphagic patients was enrolled for the internal consistency analysis. Seventy-eight patients completed the I-SWAL-QOL twice, 2 weeks apart, for test–retest reliability analysis. A group of 200 asymptomatic subjects completed the I-SWAL-QOL for normative data generation. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained by both the group of dysphagic subjects and asymptomatic ones were compared for validity analysis. I-SWAL-QOL scores were correlated with SF-36 scores in 67 patients with dysphagia for concurrent validity analysis. Finally, I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in a group of 30 dysphagic patients before and after successful rehabilitation treatment were compared for responsiveness analysis. All the enrolled patients managed to complete the I-SWAL-QOL without needing any assistance, within 20 min. Internal consistency was acceptable for all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (α > 0.70). Test–retest reliability was also satisfactory for all subscales (ICC > 0.7). A significant difference between the dysphagic group and the control group was found in all I-SWAL-QOL subscales (p <0.05). Mild to moderate correlations between I-SWAL-QOL and SF-36 subscales were observed. I-SWAL-QOL scores obtained in the pre-treatment condition were significantly lower than those obtained after swallowing rehabilitation. I-SWAL-QOL is reliable, valid, responsive to changes in QOL, and recommended for clinical practice and outcome research.

KW - Deglutition

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Outcome

KW - Self-assessment

KW - Swallowing disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979225522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979225522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z

DO - 10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Dysphagia

JF - Dysphagia

SN - 0179-051X

ER -