TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-cultural validity of Functional Independence Measure items in stroke
T2 - A study using Rasch analysis
AU - Lundgren-Nilsson, Åsa
AU - Grimby, Gunnar
AU - Ring, Haim
AU - Tesio, Luigi
AU - Lawton, Gemma
AU - Slade, Anita
AU - Penta, Massimo
AU - Tripolski, Maria
AU - Biering-Sørensen, Fin
AU - Carter, Jane
AU - Marincek, Crt
AU - Phillips, Suzanne
AU - Simone, Anna
AU - Tennant, Alan
PY - 2005/1
Y1 - 2005/1
N2 - Objective: To analyse cross-cultural validity of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) in patients with stroke using the Rasch model. Settings: Thirty-one rehabilitation facilities within 6 different countries in Europe. Participants: A total of 2546 in-patients at admission, median age 63 years. Methods: Data from the FIM™ were evaluated with the Rasch model, using the Rasch analysis package RUMM2020. A detailed analysis of scoring functions of the 7 categories of the FIM items was undertaken prior to testing fit to the model. Categories were re-scored where necessary. Analysis of Differential Item Functioning was undertaken in pooled data for each of the FIM motor and social-cognitive scales, respectively. Results: Disordered thresholds were found on most items when using 7 categories. Fit to the Rasch model varied between countries. Differential Item Functioning was found by country for most items. Adequate fit to the Rasch model was achieved when items were treated as unique for each country and after a few country-specific items were removed. Conclusion: Clinical collected data from FIM for patients with stroke cannot be pooled in its raw form, or compared across countries. Comparisons can be made after adjusting for country-specific Differential Item Functioning, though the adjustments for Differential Item Functioning and rating scales may not generalize to other samples.
AB - Objective: To analyse cross-cultural validity of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) in patients with stroke using the Rasch model. Settings: Thirty-one rehabilitation facilities within 6 different countries in Europe. Participants: A total of 2546 in-patients at admission, median age 63 years. Methods: Data from the FIM™ were evaluated with the Rasch model, using the Rasch analysis package RUMM2020. A detailed analysis of scoring functions of the 7 categories of the FIM items was undertaken prior to testing fit to the model. Categories were re-scored where necessary. Analysis of Differential Item Functioning was undertaken in pooled data for each of the FIM motor and social-cognitive scales, respectively. Results: Disordered thresholds were found on most items when using 7 categories. Fit to the Rasch model varied between countries. Differential Item Functioning was found by country for most items. Adequate fit to the Rasch model was achieved when items were treated as unique for each country and after a few country-specific items were removed. Conclusion: Clinical collected data from FIM for patients with stroke cannot be pooled in its raw form, or compared across countries. Comparisons can be made after adjusting for country-specific Differential Item Functioning, though the adjustments for Differential Item Functioning and rating scales may not generalize to other samples.
KW - Cross-cultural validity
KW - Functional independence measure
KW - Measurement
KW - Rasch analysis
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444266236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444266236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/16501970410032696
DO - 10.1080/16501970410032696
M3 - Article
C2 - 15788329
AN - SCOPUS:13444266236
VL - 37
SP - 23
EP - 31
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
SN - 1650-1977
IS - 1
ER -