Crossover versus stabilometric platform for the treatment of balance dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: A randomized study

G. Frazzitta, F. Bossio, R. Maestri, G. Palamara, R. Bera, D. Ferrazzoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Balance dysfunctions are a major challenge in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have shown that rehabilitation can play a role in their treatment. In this study, we have compared the efficacy of two different devices for balance training: stabilometric platform and crossover. We have enrolled 60 PD patients randomly assigned to two groups. The first one (stabilometric group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the stabilometric platform, whereas the second one (crossover group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the crossover. The outcome measures used were Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT). Results showed that TUG, BBS, and UPDRS II improved in both groups. There was not difference in the efficacy of the two balance treatments. Patients in both groups improved also the meters walked in the 6MWT at the end of rehabilitation, but the improvement was better for patients performing crossover training. Our results show that the crossover and the stabilometric platform have the same effect on balance dysfunction of Parkinsonian patients, while crossover gets better results on the walking capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number878472
JournalBioMed Research International
Volume2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Parkinson Disease
Patient rehabilitation
Walking
Rehabilitation
Therapeutics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)

Cite this

Crossover versus stabilometric platform for the treatment of balance dysfunction in Parkinson's disease : A randomized study. / Frazzitta, G.; Bossio, F.; Maestri, R.; Palamara, G.; Bera, R.; Ferrazzoli, D.

In: BioMed Research International, Vol. 2015, 878472, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e097f85a7e2f4c3b8183f90d1ff273ee,
title = "Crossover versus stabilometric platform for the treatment of balance dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: A randomized study",
abstract = "Balance dysfunctions are a major challenge in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have shown that rehabilitation can play a role in their treatment. In this study, we have compared the efficacy of two different devices for balance training: stabilometric platform and crossover. We have enrolled 60 PD patients randomly assigned to two groups. The first one (stabilometric group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the stabilometric platform, whereas the second one (crossover group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the crossover. The outcome measures used were Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT). Results showed that TUG, BBS, and UPDRS II improved in both groups. There was not difference in the efficacy of the two balance treatments. Patients in both groups improved also the meters walked in the 6MWT at the end of rehabilitation, but the improvement was better for patients performing crossover training. Our results show that the crossover and the stabilometric platform have the same effect on balance dysfunction of Parkinsonian patients, while crossover gets better results on the walking capacity.",
author = "G. Frazzitta and F. Bossio and R. Maestri and G. Palamara and R. Bera and D. Ferrazzoli",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1155/2015/878472",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
journal = "BioMed Research International",
issn = "2314-6133",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crossover versus stabilometric platform for the treatment of balance dysfunction in Parkinson's disease

T2 - A randomized study

AU - Frazzitta, G.

AU - Bossio, F.

AU - Maestri, R.

AU - Palamara, G.

AU - Bera, R.

AU - Ferrazzoli, D.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Balance dysfunctions are a major challenge in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have shown that rehabilitation can play a role in their treatment. In this study, we have compared the efficacy of two different devices for balance training: stabilometric platform and crossover. We have enrolled 60 PD patients randomly assigned to two groups. The first one (stabilometric group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the stabilometric platform, whereas the second one (crossover group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the crossover. The outcome measures used were Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT). Results showed that TUG, BBS, and UPDRS II improved in both groups. There was not difference in the efficacy of the two balance treatments. Patients in both groups improved also the meters walked in the 6MWT at the end of rehabilitation, but the improvement was better for patients performing crossover training. Our results show that the crossover and the stabilometric platform have the same effect on balance dysfunction of Parkinsonian patients, while crossover gets better results on the walking capacity.

AB - Balance dysfunctions are a major challenge in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have shown that rehabilitation can play a role in their treatment. In this study, we have compared the efficacy of two different devices for balance training: stabilometric platform and crossover. We have enrolled 60 PD patients randomly assigned to two groups. The first one (stabilometric group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the stabilometric platform, whereas the second one (crossover group) performed a 4-week cycle of balance training, using the crossover. The outcome measures used were Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT). Results showed that TUG, BBS, and UPDRS II improved in both groups. There was not difference in the efficacy of the two balance treatments. Patients in both groups improved also the meters walked in the 6MWT at the end of rehabilitation, but the improvement was better for patients performing crossover training. Our results show that the crossover and the stabilometric platform have the same effect on balance dysfunction of Parkinsonian patients, while crossover gets better results on the walking capacity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947557414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947557414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2015/878472

DO - 10.1155/2015/878472

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947557414

VL - 2015

JO - BioMed Research International

JF - BioMed Research International

SN - 2314-6133

M1 - 878472

ER -