CT-based weight assessment of lung lobes

Comparison with ex vivo measurements

Nicola Sverzellati, Jan Martin Kuhnigk, Simone Furia, Stefano Diciotti, Paolo Scanagatta, Alfonso Marchianò, Francesco Molinari, Christina Stoecker, Ugo Pastorino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the validity of lung lobe weight assessment via computed tomography (CT) by comparing CT-derived and ex vivo measurements. Materials and Methods: Unenhanced CT scanning was performed in 30 consecutive patients before lobectomy for lung cancer. The CT images were analyzed using research software after allowing for lobar weight quantitation. The lobar weight estimated by CT was then compared with that measured after surgery using a precision scale (ex vivo measurement). Comparisons as well as assessment of intra- and interoperator variability were conducted using the Bland-Altman method and the coefficient of repeatability (CR). Correlations were examined using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results: Comparison analyses were feasible for 28 cases. The ex vivo lobe weight was 186.2±57.3 g, whereas the weights measured by the two operators by CT were 190.0±55 and 182.4±58.2 g, respectively. As compared with ex vivo weights, the CR was 36.4 for operator 1 and 50.4 for operator 2; the mean differences were 3.8 and -3.8 for operators 1 and 2, respectively. The intraoperator and interoperator CR were 20.9 and 36.6, respectively. The mean differences for the intra- and interoperator analysis were -1.5 and -7.5, respectively. The correlation was very high between CT-based and ex vivo measurements (r=0.95 and r=0.90 for operators 1 and 2, respectively; P <0.001). Conclusion: Estimation of lung lobe weight by semi-automated CT analysis is sufficiently reproducible and in agreement with ex vivo measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-359
Number of pages5
JournalDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Tomography
Weights and Measures
Lung
Lung Neoplasms
Software
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

CT-based weight assessment of lung lobes : Comparison with ex vivo measurements. / Sverzellati, Nicola; Kuhnigk, Jan Martin; Furia, Simone; Diciotti, Stefano; Scanagatta, Paolo; Marchianò, Alfonso; Molinari, Francesco; Stoecker, Christina; Pastorino, Ugo.

In: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 355-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sverzellati, Nicola ; Kuhnigk, Jan Martin ; Furia, Simone ; Diciotti, Stefano ; Scanagatta, Paolo ; Marchianò, Alfonso ; Molinari, Francesco ; Stoecker, Christina ; Pastorino, Ugo. / CT-based weight assessment of lung lobes : Comparison with ex vivo measurements. In: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 355-359.
@article{4b17abc960a84e59830857328a69abc9,
title = "CT-based weight assessment of lung lobes: Comparison with ex vivo measurements",
abstract = "Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the validity of lung lobe weight assessment via computed tomography (CT) by comparing CT-derived and ex vivo measurements. Materials and Methods: Unenhanced CT scanning was performed in 30 consecutive patients before lobectomy for lung cancer. The CT images were analyzed using research software after allowing for lobar weight quantitation. The lobar weight estimated by CT was then compared with that measured after surgery using a precision scale (ex vivo measurement). Comparisons as well as assessment of intra- and interoperator variability were conducted using the Bland-Altman method and the coefficient of repeatability (CR). Correlations were examined using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results: Comparison analyses were feasible for 28 cases. The ex vivo lobe weight was 186.2±57.3 g, whereas the weights measured by the two operators by CT were 190.0±55 and 182.4±58.2 g, respectively. As compared with ex vivo weights, the CR was 36.4 for operator 1 and 50.4 for operator 2; the mean differences were 3.8 and -3.8 for operators 1 and 2, respectively. The intraoperator and interoperator CR were 20.9 and 36.6, respectively. The mean differences for the intra- and interoperator analysis were -1.5 and -7.5, respectively. The correlation was very high between CT-based and ex vivo measurements (r=0.95 and r=0.90 for operators 1 and 2, respectively; P <0.001). Conclusion: Estimation of lung lobe weight by semi-automated CT analysis is sufficiently reproducible and in agreement with ex vivo measurements.",
author = "Nicola Sverzellati and Kuhnigk, {Jan Martin} and Simone Furia and Stefano Diciotti and Paolo Scanagatta and Alfonso Marchian{\`o} and Francesco Molinari and Christina Stoecker and Ugo Pastorino",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.5152/dir.2013.149",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "355--359",
journal = "Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "1305-3825",
publisher = "Turkish Society of Radiology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CT-based weight assessment of lung lobes

T2 - Comparison with ex vivo measurements

AU - Sverzellati, Nicola

AU - Kuhnigk, Jan Martin

AU - Furia, Simone

AU - Diciotti, Stefano

AU - Scanagatta, Paolo

AU - Marchianò, Alfonso

AU - Molinari, Francesco

AU - Stoecker, Christina

AU - Pastorino, Ugo

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the validity of lung lobe weight assessment via computed tomography (CT) by comparing CT-derived and ex vivo measurements. Materials and Methods: Unenhanced CT scanning was performed in 30 consecutive patients before lobectomy for lung cancer. The CT images were analyzed using research software after allowing for lobar weight quantitation. The lobar weight estimated by CT was then compared with that measured after surgery using a precision scale (ex vivo measurement). Comparisons as well as assessment of intra- and interoperator variability were conducted using the Bland-Altman method and the coefficient of repeatability (CR). Correlations were examined using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results: Comparison analyses were feasible for 28 cases. The ex vivo lobe weight was 186.2±57.3 g, whereas the weights measured by the two operators by CT were 190.0±55 and 182.4±58.2 g, respectively. As compared with ex vivo weights, the CR was 36.4 for operator 1 and 50.4 for operator 2; the mean differences were 3.8 and -3.8 for operators 1 and 2, respectively. The intraoperator and interoperator CR were 20.9 and 36.6, respectively. The mean differences for the intra- and interoperator analysis were -1.5 and -7.5, respectively. The correlation was very high between CT-based and ex vivo measurements (r=0.95 and r=0.90 for operators 1 and 2, respectively; P <0.001). Conclusion: Estimation of lung lobe weight by semi-automated CT analysis is sufficiently reproducible and in agreement with ex vivo measurements.

AB - Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the validity of lung lobe weight assessment via computed tomography (CT) by comparing CT-derived and ex vivo measurements. Materials and Methods: Unenhanced CT scanning was performed in 30 consecutive patients before lobectomy for lung cancer. The CT images were analyzed using research software after allowing for lobar weight quantitation. The lobar weight estimated by CT was then compared with that measured after surgery using a precision scale (ex vivo measurement). Comparisons as well as assessment of intra- and interoperator variability were conducted using the Bland-Altman method and the coefficient of repeatability (CR). Correlations were examined using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results: Comparison analyses were feasible for 28 cases. The ex vivo lobe weight was 186.2±57.3 g, whereas the weights measured by the two operators by CT were 190.0±55 and 182.4±58.2 g, respectively. As compared with ex vivo weights, the CR was 36.4 for operator 1 and 50.4 for operator 2; the mean differences were 3.8 and -3.8 for operators 1 and 2, respectively. The intraoperator and interoperator CR were 20.9 and 36.6, respectively. The mean differences for the intra- and interoperator analysis were -1.5 and -7.5, respectively. The correlation was very high between CT-based and ex vivo measurements (r=0.95 and r=0.90 for operators 1 and 2, respectively; P <0.001). Conclusion: Estimation of lung lobe weight by semi-automated CT analysis is sufficiently reproducible and in agreement with ex vivo measurements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883333874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883333874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5152/dir.2013.149

DO - 10.5152/dir.2013.149

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 355

EP - 359

JO - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

JF - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1305-3825

IS - 5

ER -