Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation: A review

F. Antonaci, S. Ghirmai, G. Bono, G. Nappi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cervical spine mobility is difficult to investigate accurately because of its anatomic structure and the compensatory movements. Different methods have been conceived in order to obtain a reliable measurement of cervical range of movement (ROM). We reviewed different instruments described in the literature: x-rays, CT and MRI, goniometer, inclinometer, cybex and related devices, and opto-electronic scanners. Cybex and 3D kinematic analysis by means of opto-electronic scanners (Elite system) seemed to be the most reliable and reproducible methods. Cybex equipment is relatively inexpensive and easy to use in a clinical setting, while the Elite system is expensive and requires special training of the personnel. However, the choice of method depends primarily on whether the physician's goal is a clinical screening or a thorough investigation of neck function (e.g., post-traumatic cervical spine disorders). For the first purpose, certain types of goniometers (gravity goniometer, ad modum Myrin), as well as the cybex, show good reproducibility and reliability in evaluating maximal cervical ROM (flexion- extension, rotation, lateral bending), while x-rays and, above all, 3D kinematic analysis (using opto-electronic scanners) are more suitable for diagnostic and follow-up evaluation of neck disorders.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical and Experimental Rheumatology
Volume18
Issue number2 SUPPL. 19
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Spine
Biomechanical Phenomena
Neck
X-Rays
Equipment and Supplies
Gravitation
Physicians

Keywords

  • Cervical spine
  • Kinematic analysis
  • Neck movement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation : A review. / Antonaci, F.; Ghirmai, S.; Bono, G.; Nappi, G.

In: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, Vol. 18, No. 2 SUPPL. 19, 2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Antonaci, F. ; Ghirmai, S. ; Bono, G. ; Nappi, G. / Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation : A review. In: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2000 ; Vol. 18, No. 2 SUPPL. 19.
@article{4f6b7dbdf7424365b5c6e9426ed8691c,
title = "Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation: A review",
abstract = "Cervical spine mobility is difficult to investigate accurately because of its anatomic structure and the compensatory movements. Different methods have been conceived in order to obtain a reliable measurement of cervical range of movement (ROM). We reviewed different instruments described in the literature: x-rays, CT and MRI, goniometer, inclinometer, cybex and related devices, and opto-electronic scanners. Cybex and 3D kinematic analysis by means of opto-electronic scanners (Elite system) seemed to be the most reliable and reproducible methods. Cybex equipment is relatively inexpensive and easy to use in a clinical setting, while the Elite system is expensive and requires special training of the personnel. However, the choice of method depends primarily on whether the physician's goal is a clinical screening or a thorough investigation of neck function (e.g., post-traumatic cervical spine disorders). For the first purpose, certain types of goniometers (gravity goniometer, ad modum Myrin), as well as the cybex, show good reproducibility and reliability in evaluating maximal cervical ROM (flexion- extension, rotation, lateral bending), while x-rays and, above all, 3D kinematic analysis (using opto-electronic scanners) are more suitable for diagnostic and follow-up evaluation of neck disorders.",
keywords = "Cervical spine, Kinematic analysis, Neck movement",
author = "F. Antonaci and S. Ghirmai and G. Bono and G. Nappi",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology",
issn = "0392-856X",
publisher = "Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.",
number = "2 SUPPL. 19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation

T2 - A review

AU - Antonaci, F.

AU - Ghirmai, S.

AU - Bono, G.

AU - Nappi, G.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Cervical spine mobility is difficult to investigate accurately because of its anatomic structure and the compensatory movements. Different methods have been conceived in order to obtain a reliable measurement of cervical range of movement (ROM). We reviewed different instruments described in the literature: x-rays, CT and MRI, goniometer, inclinometer, cybex and related devices, and opto-electronic scanners. Cybex and 3D kinematic analysis by means of opto-electronic scanners (Elite system) seemed to be the most reliable and reproducible methods. Cybex equipment is relatively inexpensive and easy to use in a clinical setting, while the Elite system is expensive and requires special training of the personnel. However, the choice of method depends primarily on whether the physician's goal is a clinical screening or a thorough investigation of neck function (e.g., post-traumatic cervical spine disorders). For the first purpose, certain types of goniometers (gravity goniometer, ad modum Myrin), as well as the cybex, show good reproducibility and reliability in evaluating maximal cervical ROM (flexion- extension, rotation, lateral bending), while x-rays and, above all, 3D kinematic analysis (using opto-electronic scanners) are more suitable for diagnostic and follow-up evaluation of neck disorders.

AB - Cervical spine mobility is difficult to investigate accurately because of its anatomic structure and the compensatory movements. Different methods have been conceived in order to obtain a reliable measurement of cervical range of movement (ROM). We reviewed different instruments described in the literature: x-rays, CT and MRI, goniometer, inclinometer, cybex and related devices, and opto-electronic scanners. Cybex and 3D kinematic analysis by means of opto-electronic scanners (Elite system) seemed to be the most reliable and reproducible methods. Cybex equipment is relatively inexpensive and easy to use in a clinical setting, while the Elite system is expensive and requires special training of the personnel. However, the choice of method depends primarily on whether the physician's goal is a clinical screening or a thorough investigation of neck function (e.g., post-traumatic cervical spine disorders). For the first purpose, certain types of goniometers (gravity goniometer, ad modum Myrin), as well as the cybex, show good reproducibility and reliability in evaluating maximal cervical ROM (flexion- extension, rotation, lateral bending), while x-rays and, above all, 3D kinematic analysis (using opto-electronic scanners) are more suitable for diagnostic and follow-up evaluation of neck disorders.

KW - Cervical spine

KW - Kinematic analysis

KW - Neck movement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034071033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034071033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10824287

AN - SCOPUS:0034071033

VL - 18

JO - Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

JF - Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

SN - 0392-856X

IS - 2 SUPPL. 19

ER -