Current recommendations for neurotrauma

A. I R Maas, Mark Dearden, Franco Servadei, Nino Stocchetti, Andreas Unterberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnostic and monitoring procedures for patients with head injury are aimed at early detection of mass lesions and secondary insults. Our therapeutic approach is based on our understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause secondary brain damage, and includes evacuation of mass lesions and prevention of secondary insults. Basic research has greatly increased our knowledge of these pathophysiologic mechanisms and has prompted the development of many neuro-protective agents, targeted to selected mechanisms. Unfortunately, it has proved difficult to demonstrate the benefit of such agents in the overall population of head-injured patients. Clinical research has emphasized the importance of ischemia in head injury and has demonstrated the deleterious effect of secondary insults on outcome. Medical management of patients with head injury has consequently focused on prevention of secondary insults, treatment of raised intracranial pressure, and maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion pressure. The introduction of new monitoring techniques in head-injured patients offers the possibilities of more targeted therapy in individual patients, in contrast to the current practice of a staircase approach to treatment of raised intracranial pressure. In the US, an evidence-based approach has resulted in the wide acceptance of general principles, but at the same time highlighted the lack of hard evidence for the use of many therapeutic modalities. Practical guidelines, developed and published by the European Brain Injury Consortium, are based on expert opinion and consensus. Surveys have shown considerable variation in monitoring techniques and treatment. There is still considerable need for further improvements, both from a medical scientific perspective and from an organizational aspect. Particularly relevant are early resuscitation and stabilization at the scene of the accident, the organization of emergency services, admission policy to the intensive care unit, and improved policy for early identification of patients with operable intracranial hematoma. Further dissemination and general acceptance of already published guidelines may be expected to significantly improve care in head injury. (C) 2000 Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-292
Number of pages12
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Craniocerebral Trauma
Intracranial Pressure
Secondary Prevention
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Head
Guidelines
Therapeutics
Protective Agents
Expert Testimony
Physiologic Monitoring
Therapeutic Uses
Research
Resuscitation
Hematoma
Brain Injuries
Accidents
Intensive Care Units
Emergencies
Ischemia
Organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Current recommendations for neurotrauma. / Maas, A. I R; Dearden, Mark; Servadei, Franco; Stocchetti, Nino; Unterberg, Andreas.

In: Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2000, p. 281-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maas, AIR, Dearden, M, Servadei, F, Stocchetti, N & Unterberg, A 2000, 'Current recommendations for neurotrauma', Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200008000-00008
Maas, A. I R ; Dearden, Mark ; Servadei, Franco ; Stocchetti, Nino ; Unterberg, Andreas. / Current recommendations for neurotrauma. In: Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2000 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 281-292.
@article{e3ebaf7e271d422cb8c0e2ff91cbe1c1,
title = "Current recommendations for neurotrauma",
abstract = "Diagnostic and monitoring procedures for patients with head injury are aimed at early detection of mass lesions and secondary insults. Our therapeutic approach is based on our understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause secondary brain damage, and includes evacuation of mass lesions and prevention of secondary insults. Basic research has greatly increased our knowledge of these pathophysiologic mechanisms and has prompted the development of many neuro-protective agents, targeted to selected mechanisms. Unfortunately, it has proved difficult to demonstrate the benefit of such agents in the overall population of head-injured patients. Clinical research has emphasized the importance of ischemia in head injury and has demonstrated the deleterious effect of secondary insults on outcome. Medical management of patients with head injury has consequently focused on prevention of secondary insults, treatment of raised intracranial pressure, and maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion pressure. The introduction of new monitoring techniques in head-injured patients offers the possibilities of more targeted therapy in individual patients, in contrast to the current practice of a staircase approach to treatment of raised intracranial pressure. In the US, an evidence-based approach has resulted in the wide acceptance of general principles, but at the same time highlighted the lack of hard evidence for the use of many therapeutic modalities. Practical guidelines, developed and published by the European Brain Injury Consortium, are based on expert opinion and consensus. Surveys have shown considerable variation in monitoring techniques and treatment. There is still considerable need for further improvements, both from a medical scientific perspective and from an organizational aspect. Particularly relevant are early resuscitation and stabilization at the scene of the accident, the organization of emergency services, admission policy to the intensive care unit, and improved policy for early identification of patients with operable intracranial hematoma. Further dissemination and general acceptance of already published guidelines may be expected to significantly improve care in head injury. (C) 2000 Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Inc.",
author = "Maas, {A. I R} and Mark Dearden and Franco Servadei and Nino Stocchetti and Andreas Unterberg",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1097/00075198-200008000-00008",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "281--292",
journal = "Current Opinion in Critical Care",
issn = "1070-5295",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current recommendations for neurotrauma

AU - Maas, A. I R

AU - Dearden, Mark

AU - Servadei, Franco

AU - Stocchetti, Nino

AU - Unterberg, Andreas

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Diagnostic and monitoring procedures for patients with head injury are aimed at early detection of mass lesions and secondary insults. Our therapeutic approach is based on our understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause secondary brain damage, and includes evacuation of mass lesions and prevention of secondary insults. Basic research has greatly increased our knowledge of these pathophysiologic mechanisms and has prompted the development of many neuro-protective agents, targeted to selected mechanisms. Unfortunately, it has proved difficult to demonstrate the benefit of such agents in the overall population of head-injured patients. Clinical research has emphasized the importance of ischemia in head injury and has demonstrated the deleterious effect of secondary insults on outcome. Medical management of patients with head injury has consequently focused on prevention of secondary insults, treatment of raised intracranial pressure, and maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion pressure. The introduction of new monitoring techniques in head-injured patients offers the possibilities of more targeted therapy in individual patients, in contrast to the current practice of a staircase approach to treatment of raised intracranial pressure. In the US, an evidence-based approach has resulted in the wide acceptance of general principles, but at the same time highlighted the lack of hard evidence for the use of many therapeutic modalities. Practical guidelines, developed and published by the European Brain Injury Consortium, are based on expert opinion and consensus. Surveys have shown considerable variation in monitoring techniques and treatment. There is still considerable need for further improvements, both from a medical scientific perspective and from an organizational aspect. Particularly relevant are early resuscitation and stabilization at the scene of the accident, the organization of emergency services, admission policy to the intensive care unit, and improved policy for early identification of patients with operable intracranial hematoma. Further dissemination and general acceptance of already published guidelines may be expected to significantly improve care in head injury. (C) 2000 Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Inc.

AB - Diagnostic and monitoring procedures for patients with head injury are aimed at early detection of mass lesions and secondary insults. Our therapeutic approach is based on our understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause secondary brain damage, and includes evacuation of mass lesions and prevention of secondary insults. Basic research has greatly increased our knowledge of these pathophysiologic mechanisms and has prompted the development of many neuro-protective agents, targeted to selected mechanisms. Unfortunately, it has proved difficult to demonstrate the benefit of such agents in the overall population of head-injured patients. Clinical research has emphasized the importance of ischemia in head injury and has demonstrated the deleterious effect of secondary insults on outcome. Medical management of patients with head injury has consequently focused on prevention of secondary insults, treatment of raised intracranial pressure, and maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion pressure. The introduction of new monitoring techniques in head-injured patients offers the possibilities of more targeted therapy in individual patients, in contrast to the current practice of a staircase approach to treatment of raised intracranial pressure. In the US, an evidence-based approach has resulted in the wide acceptance of general principles, but at the same time highlighted the lack of hard evidence for the use of many therapeutic modalities. Practical guidelines, developed and published by the European Brain Injury Consortium, are based on expert opinion and consensus. Surveys have shown considerable variation in monitoring techniques and treatment. There is still considerable need for further improvements, both from a medical scientific perspective and from an organizational aspect. Particularly relevant are early resuscitation and stabilization at the scene of the accident, the organization of emergency services, admission policy to the intensive care unit, and improved policy for early identification of patients with operable intracranial hematoma. Further dissemination and general acceptance of already published guidelines may be expected to significantly improve care in head injury. (C) 2000 Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Inc.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033864831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033864831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00075198-200008000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00075198-200008000-00008

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 281

EP - 292

JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care

JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care

SN - 1070-5295

IS - 4

ER -