Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories

Leda Dalprà, Daniela Giardino, Palma Finelli, Cecilia Corti, Chiara Valtorta, Silvana Guerneri, Patrizia Ilardi, Renata Fortuna, Domenico Coviello, Gianfranco Nocera, Francesco Paolo Amico, Emanuela Martinoli, Elena Sala, Nicoletta Villa, Francesca Crosti, Francamaria Chiodo, Ludovica Verdun Di Cantogno, Elisa Savin, Gianfranco Croci, Fabrizia FranchiGiovanna Venti, Emilio Donti, Valeria Migliori, Antonella Pettinari, Stefania Bonifacio, Claudia Centrone, Francesca Torricelli, Simona Rossi, Paolo Simi, Paola Granata, Rosario Casalone, Elisabetta Lenzini, Lina Artifoni, Vanna Pecile, Sergio Barlati, Daniela Bellotti, Daniele Caufin, Adalgisa Police, Simona Cavani, Giuseppe Piombo, Mauro Pierluigi, Lidia Larizza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the experiences of 19 Italian laboratories concerning 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) with the aim of answering questions arising from their origin from any chromosome, their variable size and genetic content, and their impact on the carrier's phenotype. Methods: Conventional protocols were used to set up the cultures and chromosome preparations. Both commercial and homemade probes were used for the fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses. Results: A total of 113 of the 241 sSMCs were detected antenatally, and 128 were detected postnatally. There were 52 inherited and 172 de novo cases. Abnormal phenotype was present in 137 cases (57%), 38 of which were antenatally diagnosed. A mosaic condition was observed in 87 cases (36%). In terms of morphology, monocentric and dicentric bisatellited marker chromosomes were the most common, followed by monocentric rings and short-arm isochromosomes. The chromosomes generating the sSMCs were acrocentric in 132 cases (69%) and non-acrocentric chromosomes in 60 cases (31%); a neocentromere was hypothesized in three cases involving chromosomes 6, 8, and 15. Conclusion: The presented and published data still do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn concerning karyotype-phenotype correlations. Only concerted efforts to characterize molecularly the sSMCs associated or not with a clinical phenotype can yield results suitable for addressing karyotype-phenotype correlations in support of genetic counseling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)620-625
Number of pages6
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume7
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Genetic Markers
Cytogenetics
Phenotype
Chromosomes
Karyotype
Isochromosomes
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6
Genetic Counseling
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Keywords

  • Cooperative study
  • Genetic counseling
  • Genotype-phenotype correlations
  • Prenatal diagnosis
  • Supernumerary marker chromosomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics

Cite this

Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes : Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories. / Dalprà, Leda; Giardino, Daniela; Finelli, Palma; Corti, Cecilia; Valtorta, Chiara; Guerneri, Silvana; Ilardi, Patrizia; Fortuna, Renata; Coviello, Domenico; Nocera, Gianfranco; Amico, Francesco Paolo; Martinoli, Emanuela; Sala, Elena; Villa, Nicoletta; Crosti, Francesca; Chiodo, Francamaria; Di Cantogno, Ludovica Verdun; Savin, Elisa; Croci, Gianfranco; Franchi, Fabrizia; Venti, Giovanna; Donti, Emilio; Migliori, Valeria; Pettinari, Antonella; Bonifacio, Stefania; Centrone, Claudia; Torricelli, Francesca; Rossi, Simona; Simi, Paolo; Granata, Paola; Casalone, Rosario; Lenzini, Elisabetta; Artifoni, Lina; Pecile, Vanna; Barlati, Sergio; Bellotti, Daniela; Caufin, Daniele; Police, Adalgisa; Cavani, Simona; Piombo, Giuseppe; Pierluigi, Mauro; Larizza, Lidia.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 9, 11.2005, p. 620-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dalprà, L, Giardino, D, Finelli, P, Corti, C, Valtorta, C, Guerneri, S, Ilardi, P, Fortuna, R, Coviello, D, Nocera, G, Amico, FP, Martinoli, E, Sala, E, Villa, N, Crosti, F, Chiodo, F, Di Cantogno, LV, Savin, E, Croci, G, Franchi, F, Venti, G, Donti, E, Migliori, V, Pettinari, A, Bonifacio, S, Centrone, C, Torricelli, F, Rossi, S, Simi, P, Granata, P, Casalone, R, Lenzini, E, Artifoni, L, Pecile, V, Barlati, S, Bellotti, D, Caufin, D, Police, A, Cavani, S, Piombo, G, Pierluigi, M & Larizza, L 2005, 'Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories', Genetics in Medicine, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 620-625. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2d
Dalprà, Leda ; Giardino, Daniela ; Finelli, Palma ; Corti, Cecilia ; Valtorta, Chiara ; Guerneri, Silvana ; Ilardi, Patrizia ; Fortuna, Renata ; Coviello, Domenico ; Nocera, Gianfranco ; Amico, Francesco Paolo ; Martinoli, Emanuela ; Sala, Elena ; Villa, Nicoletta ; Crosti, Francesca ; Chiodo, Francamaria ; Di Cantogno, Ludovica Verdun ; Savin, Elisa ; Croci, Gianfranco ; Franchi, Fabrizia ; Venti, Giovanna ; Donti, Emilio ; Migliori, Valeria ; Pettinari, Antonella ; Bonifacio, Stefania ; Centrone, Claudia ; Torricelli, Francesca ; Rossi, Simona ; Simi, Paolo ; Granata, Paola ; Casalone, Rosario ; Lenzini, Elisabetta ; Artifoni, Lina ; Pecile, Vanna ; Barlati, Sergio ; Bellotti, Daniela ; Caufin, Daniele ; Police, Adalgisa ; Cavani, Simona ; Piombo, Giuseppe ; Pierluigi, Mauro ; Larizza, Lidia. / Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes : Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories. In: Genetics in Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 9. pp. 620-625.
@article{9dce53503daf49c59ca8475c9c6253bd,
title = "Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated the experiences of 19 Italian laboratories concerning 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) with the aim of answering questions arising from their origin from any chromosome, their variable size and genetic content, and their impact on the carrier's phenotype. Methods: Conventional protocols were used to set up the cultures and chromosome preparations. Both commercial and homemade probes were used for the fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses. Results: A total of 113 of the 241 sSMCs were detected antenatally, and 128 were detected postnatally. There were 52 inherited and 172 de novo cases. Abnormal phenotype was present in 137 cases (57{\%}), 38 of which were antenatally diagnosed. A mosaic condition was observed in 87 cases (36{\%}). In terms of morphology, monocentric and dicentric bisatellited marker chromosomes were the most common, followed by monocentric rings and short-arm isochromosomes. The chromosomes generating the sSMCs were acrocentric in 132 cases (69{\%}) and non-acrocentric chromosomes in 60 cases (31{\%}); a neocentromere was hypothesized in three cases involving chromosomes 6, 8, and 15. Conclusion: The presented and published data still do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn concerning karyotype-phenotype correlations. Only concerted efforts to characterize molecularly the sSMCs associated or not with a clinical phenotype can yield results suitable for addressing karyotype-phenotype correlations in support of genetic counseling.",
keywords = "Cooperative study, Genetic counseling, Genotype-phenotype correlations, Prenatal diagnosis, Supernumerary marker chromosomes",
author = "Leda Dalpr{\`a} and Daniela Giardino and Palma Finelli and Cecilia Corti and Chiara Valtorta and Silvana Guerneri and Patrizia Ilardi and Renata Fortuna and Domenico Coviello and Gianfranco Nocera and Amico, {Francesco Paolo} and Emanuela Martinoli and Elena Sala and Nicoletta Villa and Francesca Crosti and Francamaria Chiodo and {Di Cantogno}, {Ludovica Verdun} and Elisa Savin and Gianfranco Croci and Fabrizia Franchi and Giovanna Venti and Emilio Donti and Valeria Migliori and Antonella Pettinari and Stefania Bonifacio and Claudia Centrone and Francesca Torricelli and Simona Rossi and Paolo Simi and Paola Granata and Rosario Casalone and Elisabetta Lenzini and Lina Artifoni and Vanna Pecile and Sergio Barlati and Daniela Bellotti and Daniele Caufin and Adalgisa Police and Simona Cavani and Giuseppe Piombo and Mauro Pierluigi and Lidia Larizza",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2d",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "620--625",
journal = "Genetics in Medicine",
issn = "1098-3600",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes

T2 - Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories

AU - Dalprà, Leda

AU - Giardino, Daniela

AU - Finelli, Palma

AU - Corti, Cecilia

AU - Valtorta, Chiara

AU - Guerneri, Silvana

AU - Ilardi, Patrizia

AU - Fortuna, Renata

AU - Coviello, Domenico

AU - Nocera, Gianfranco

AU - Amico, Francesco Paolo

AU - Martinoli, Emanuela

AU - Sala, Elena

AU - Villa, Nicoletta

AU - Crosti, Francesca

AU - Chiodo, Francamaria

AU - Di Cantogno, Ludovica Verdun

AU - Savin, Elisa

AU - Croci, Gianfranco

AU - Franchi, Fabrizia

AU - Venti, Giovanna

AU - Donti, Emilio

AU - Migliori, Valeria

AU - Pettinari, Antonella

AU - Bonifacio, Stefania

AU - Centrone, Claudia

AU - Torricelli, Francesca

AU - Rossi, Simona

AU - Simi, Paolo

AU - Granata, Paola

AU - Casalone, Rosario

AU - Lenzini, Elisabetta

AU - Artifoni, Lina

AU - Pecile, Vanna

AU - Barlati, Sergio

AU - Bellotti, Daniela

AU - Caufin, Daniele

AU - Police, Adalgisa

AU - Cavani, Simona

AU - Piombo, Giuseppe

AU - Pierluigi, Mauro

AU - Larizza, Lidia

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated the experiences of 19 Italian laboratories concerning 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) with the aim of answering questions arising from their origin from any chromosome, their variable size and genetic content, and their impact on the carrier's phenotype. Methods: Conventional protocols were used to set up the cultures and chromosome preparations. Both commercial and homemade probes were used for the fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses. Results: A total of 113 of the 241 sSMCs were detected antenatally, and 128 were detected postnatally. There were 52 inherited and 172 de novo cases. Abnormal phenotype was present in 137 cases (57%), 38 of which were antenatally diagnosed. A mosaic condition was observed in 87 cases (36%). In terms of morphology, monocentric and dicentric bisatellited marker chromosomes were the most common, followed by monocentric rings and short-arm isochromosomes. The chromosomes generating the sSMCs were acrocentric in 132 cases (69%) and non-acrocentric chromosomes in 60 cases (31%); a neocentromere was hypothesized in three cases involving chromosomes 6, 8, and 15. Conclusion: The presented and published data still do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn concerning karyotype-phenotype correlations. Only concerted efforts to characterize molecularly the sSMCs associated or not with a clinical phenotype can yield results suitable for addressing karyotype-phenotype correlations in support of genetic counseling.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated the experiences of 19 Italian laboratories concerning 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) with the aim of answering questions arising from their origin from any chromosome, their variable size and genetic content, and their impact on the carrier's phenotype. Methods: Conventional protocols were used to set up the cultures and chromosome preparations. Both commercial and homemade probes were used for the fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses. Results: A total of 113 of the 241 sSMCs were detected antenatally, and 128 were detected postnatally. There were 52 inherited and 172 de novo cases. Abnormal phenotype was present in 137 cases (57%), 38 of which were antenatally diagnosed. A mosaic condition was observed in 87 cases (36%). In terms of morphology, monocentric and dicentric bisatellited marker chromosomes were the most common, followed by monocentric rings and short-arm isochromosomes. The chromosomes generating the sSMCs were acrocentric in 132 cases (69%) and non-acrocentric chromosomes in 60 cases (31%); a neocentromere was hypothesized in three cases involving chromosomes 6, 8, and 15. Conclusion: The presented and published data still do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn concerning karyotype-phenotype correlations. Only concerted efforts to characterize molecularly the sSMCs associated or not with a clinical phenotype can yield results suitable for addressing karyotype-phenotype correlations in support of genetic counseling.

KW - Cooperative study

KW - Genetic counseling

KW - Genotype-phenotype correlations

KW - Prenatal diagnosis

KW - Supernumerary marker chromosomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28644446951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28644446951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2d

DO - 10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2d

M3 - Article

C2 - 16301863

AN - SCOPUS:28644446951

VL - 7

SP - 620

EP - 625

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 9

ER -