TY - JOUR
T1 - Data on multimodal approach for early poor outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories 3-5) prediction after cardiac arrest
AU - Scarpino, Maenia
AU - Lanzo, Giovanni
AU - Lolli, Francesco
AU - Carrai, Riccardo
AU - Moretti, Marco
AU - Spalletti, Maddalena
AU - Cozzolino, Morena
AU - Peris, Adriano
AU - Amantini, Aldo
AU - Grippo, Antonello
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - The data presented in this article are related to our research article entitled ‘Neurophysiological and neuroradiological multimodal approach for early poor outcome prediction after cardiac arrest’ (Scarpino et al., 2018) [1]. We reported two additional analyses, including results gathered from somatosensory evoked potentials(SEPs), brain computed tomography(CT) and electroencephalography(EEG) performed on 183 subjects within the first 24 h after cardiac arrest(CA). In the first analysis, we considered the Cerebral Performance Categories(CPC) 3, 4 and 5a,b (severe disability, unresponsive wakefulness state, neurological death and non-neurological death, respectively) as poor outcomes. In the second analysis, patients that died from non-neurological causes (CPC 5b) were excluded from the analysis. Concerning the first analysis, bilateral absent/absent-pathologic(AA/AP) cortical SEPs predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 49.3%. A Grey Matter/White Matter(GM/WM) ratio <1.21 predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 41.7%. Isoelectric/burst-suppression EEG patterns predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 33.5%. If at least one of these poor prognostic patterns was present, the sensitivity for an ominous outcome increased to 60.9%. Concerning the second analysis, AA/AP cortical SEPs predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 52.5%. GM/WM ratio <1.21 predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 50.4%. Isoelectric/burst-suppression EEG patterns predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 39.8%.
AB - The data presented in this article are related to our research article entitled ‘Neurophysiological and neuroradiological multimodal approach for early poor outcome prediction after cardiac arrest’ (Scarpino et al., 2018) [1]. We reported two additional analyses, including results gathered from somatosensory evoked potentials(SEPs), brain computed tomography(CT) and electroencephalography(EEG) performed on 183 subjects within the first 24 h after cardiac arrest(CA). In the first analysis, we considered the Cerebral Performance Categories(CPC) 3, 4 and 5a,b (severe disability, unresponsive wakefulness state, neurological death and non-neurological death, respectively) as poor outcomes. In the second analysis, patients that died from non-neurological causes (CPC 5b) were excluded from the analysis. Concerning the first analysis, bilateral absent/absent-pathologic(AA/AP) cortical SEPs predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 49.3%. A Grey Matter/White Matter(GM/WM) ratio <1.21 predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 41.7%. Isoelectric/burst-suppression EEG patterns predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 33.5%. If at least one of these poor prognostic patterns was present, the sensitivity for an ominous outcome increased to 60.9%. Concerning the second analysis, AA/AP cortical SEPs predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 52.5%. GM/WM ratio <1.21 predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 50.4%. Isoelectric/burst-suppression EEG patterns predicted poor outcome with a sensitivity of 39.8%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047802536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047802536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.118
DO - 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.118
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047802536
VL - 19
SP - 704
EP - 711
JO - Data in Brief
JF - Data in Brief
SN - 2352-3409
ER -