Decision making in TAVI

Ensuring the best possible clinical outcomes based on the selection of patients and techniques

Rasha Al-Lamee, Ottavio Alfieri, Antonio Colombo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Severe aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, it is the most common valvular abnormality in the developed world. Many patients do not have conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as a result of advanced age and comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable alternative in this patient group, and has been recommended in patients with high surgical risk. Current guidelines for preassessment and patient selection are based on the initial TAVI studies assessing short- and longer-term outcome following valve implantation and were introduced to improve procedural success. The choice of the specific valve and delivery method is also very important in determining the clinical outcome, and requires a thorough evaluation preprocedure. This article reviews the current recommended guidelines for patient selection for TAVI, and their applications and limitations in the context of current clinical practice. As experience in the field grows, TAVI is being considered in a larger patient cohort. It may be that current guidelines are too rigid as the techniques and outcomes are improving with the widespread application of the technique. However, it remains vital that all patients undergo meticulous preassessment to ensure that the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure continue to improve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-231
Number of pages13
JournalInterventional Cardiology
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Patient Selection
Decision Making
Guidelines
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Aortic Valve
Surgical Instruments
Comorbidity
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • delivery method selection
  • patient selection
  • transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • valve selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Decision making in TAVI : Ensuring the best possible clinical outcomes based on the selection of patients and techniques. / Al-Lamee, Rasha; Alfieri, Ottavio; Colombo, Antonio.

In: Interventional Cardiology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 04.2010, p. 219-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48a4e97b68284458b88e9280a50e7257,
title = "Decision making in TAVI: Ensuring the best possible clinical outcomes based on the selection of patients and techniques",
abstract = "Severe aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, it is the most common valvular abnormality in the developed world. Many patients do not have conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as a result of advanced age and comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable alternative in this patient group, and has been recommended in patients with high surgical risk. Current guidelines for preassessment and patient selection are based on the initial TAVI studies assessing short- and longer-term outcome following valve implantation and were introduced to improve procedural success. The choice of the specific valve and delivery method is also very important in determining the clinical outcome, and requires a thorough evaluation preprocedure. This article reviews the current recommended guidelines for patient selection for TAVI, and their applications and limitations in the context of current clinical practice. As experience in the field grows, TAVI is being considered in a larger patient cohort. It may be that current guidelines are too rigid as the techniques and outcomes are improving with the widespread application of the technique. However, it remains vital that all patients undergo meticulous preassessment to ensure that the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure continue to improve.",
keywords = "delivery method selection, patient selection, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, valve selection",
author = "Rasha Al-Lamee and Ottavio Alfieri and Antonio Colombo",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.2217/ica.10.10",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "219--231",
journal = "Interventional Cardiology Review",
issn = "1756-1477",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision making in TAVI

T2 - Ensuring the best possible clinical outcomes based on the selection of patients and techniques

AU - Al-Lamee, Rasha

AU - Alfieri, Ottavio

AU - Colombo, Antonio

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Severe aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, it is the most common valvular abnormality in the developed world. Many patients do not have conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as a result of advanced age and comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable alternative in this patient group, and has been recommended in patients with high surgical risk. Current guidelines for preassessment and patient selection are based on the initial TAVI studies assessing short- and longer-term outcome following valve implantation and were introduced to improve procedural success. The choice of the specific valve and delivery method is also very important in determining the clinical outcome, and requires a thorough evaluation preprocedure. This article reviews the current recommended guidelines for patient selection for TAVI, and their applications and limitations in the context of current clinical practice. As experience in the field grows, TAVI is being considered in a larger patient cohort. It may be that current guidelines are too rigid as the techniques and outcomes are improving with the widespread application of the technique. However, it remains vital that all patients undergo meticulous preassessment to ensure that the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure continue to improve.

AB - Severe aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, it is the most common valvular abnormality in the developed world. Many patients do not have conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as a result of advanced age and comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable alternative in this patient group, and has been recommended in patients with high surgical risk. Current guidelines for preassessment and patient selection are based on the initial TAVI studies assessing short- and longer-term outcome following valve implantation and were introduced to improve procedural success. The choice of the specific valve and delivery method is also very important in determining the clinical outcome, and requires a thorough evaluation preprocedure. This article reviews the current recommended guidelines for patient selection for TAVI, and their applications and limitations in the context of current clinical practice. As experience in the field grows, TAVI is being considered in a larger patient cohort. It may be that current guidelines are too rigid as the techniques and outcomes are improving with the widespread application of the technique. However, it remains vital that all patients undergo meticulous preassessment to ensure that the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure continue to improve.

KW - delivery method selection

KW - patient selection

KW - transcatheter aortic valve implantation

KW - valve selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954106581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954106581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2217/ica.10.10

DO - 10.2217/ica.10.10

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 219

EP - 231

JO - Interventional Cardiology Review

JF - Interventional Cardiology Review

SN - 1756-1477

IS - 2

ER -